Startseite Medizin Observational studies on macroprolactin in a routine clinical laboratory
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Observational studies on macroprolactin in a routine clinical laboratory

  • Julian H. Barth EMAIL logo , Carys M. Lippiatt , Stephen G. Gibbons und Robert A. Desborough
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. April 2018

Abstract

Background:

It is now recommended that all samples with raised prolactin should be examined for the presence of macroprolactin. We performed a retrospective review of our experience of macroprolactin to determine the incidence and the natural history of macroprolactin.

Methods:

A retrospective study of macroprolactin was made in a large clinical laboratory. Macroprolactin was measured on those samples where it is requested and where the total prolactin is >1000 mIU/L. Prolactin was measured using the Siemens Centaur and macroprolactin was measured following polyethylene glycol (PEG)-precipitation.

Results:

The incidence of macroprolactin in samples where the total prolactin was >1000 mIU/L was 36/670 (5.4%). During this period, 12,064 samples were received for prolactin analysis. Over the period since 2006, 22 subjects had a sample with an isolated macroprolactin measurement followed by another sample without macroprolactin after a median period of 0.46 years. Twenty-five subjects had multiple consecutive measurements of macroprolactin lasting a median period of 2.1 years. Fourteen subjects had more than six samples which had been subjected to PEG precipitation. In these subjects, the reproducibility of PEG precipitation over a median of 6 years was 1.1% CV (recovery 75% [26–110] (median [range])).

Conclusions:

The presence of macroprolactin can change over time and we cannot advise that once a test for macroprolactinemia has been performed that it is not necessary to repeat the investigation if a subsequent sample is hyperprolactinemic; nor can one assume that macroprolactin will not develop even if it has been excluded previously.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Lippi G, Plebani M. Macroprolactin: searching for a needle in a haystack? Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:519–22.10.1515/cclm-2015-1283Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. John R, McDowell IF, Scanlon MF, Ellis AR. Macroprolactin reactivities in prolactin assays: an issue for clinical laboratories and equipment manufacturers. Clin Chem 2000;46:884–5.10.1093/clinchem/46.6.884Suche in Google Scholar

3. Hattori N, Aisaka K, Shimatsu A. A possible cause of the variable detectability of macroprolactin by different immunoassay systems. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:603–8.10.1515/cclm-2015-0484Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Lewandowski KC, Gasior-Perczak D, Kowalska A, Lewinski A. Coexistence of macroprolactinaemia and hyperprolactinaemia in women with oligo-/amenorrhoea is associated with high risk of pituitary adenomas. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014;30:385–7.10.3109/09513590.2014.887672Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Radavelli-Bagatini S, Lhullier FL, Mallmann ES, Spritzer PM. Macroprolactinemia in women with hyperprolactinemia: a 10-year follow-up. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2013;34:207–11.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Wallace IR, Satti N, Courtney CH, Leslie H, Bell PM, Hunter SJ, et al. Ten-year clinical follow-up of a cohort of 51 patients with macroprolactinemia establishes it as a benign variant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:3268–71.10.1210/jc.2010-0114Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Hattori N, Adachi T, Ishihara T, Shimatsu A. The natural history of macroprolactinaemia. Eur J Endocrinol 2012;166:625–9.10.1530/EJE-11-1007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Suliman AM, Smith TP, Gibney J, McKenna TJ. Frequent Misdiagnosis and mismanagement of hyperprolactinemic patients before the introduction of macroprolactin screening: application of a new strict laboratory definition of macroprolactinemia. Clin Chem 2003;49:1504–9.10.1373/49.9.1504Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Jassam NF, Patterson A, Lippiatt C, Barth JH. Macroprolactin on the Advia Centaur – experience with 409 patients over a 3 year period. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:501–4.10.1258/acb.2009.009059Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Smith TP, Suliman AM, Fahie-Wilson MN, McKenna TJ. Gross variability in the detection of prolactin in sera containing big big prolactin (macroprolactin) by commercial immunoassays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:5410–5.10.1210/jc.2001-011943Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Chen Y-J, Song G-Z, Wang Z-N. A new criteria for screening macroprolactinaemia using polyethylene glycol treatment combined with different assays for prolactin. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016;20:1788–94.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Overgaard M, Pedersen SM. Serum prolactin revisited: parametric reference intervals and cross platform evaluation of polyethylene glycol precipitation-based methods for discrimination between hyperprolactinemia and macroprolactinemia. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1744–53.10.1515/cclm-2016-0902Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Parlant-Pinet L, Harthe C, Roucher F, Morel Y, Borson-Chazot F, Raverot G, et al. Macroprolactinoma: a biological diagnostic strategy from the study of 222 patients. Eur J Endocrinol 2015;172:687–95.10.1530/EJE-14-1073Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Gibney J, Smith TP, McKenna TJ. The impact on clinical practice of routine screening for macroprolactin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:3927–32.10.1210/jc.2004-2234Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Gilson G, Schmit P, Thix J, Hoffman JP, Humbel RL. Prolactin results for samples containing macroprolactin are method and sample dependent. Clin Chem 2001;47:331–3.10.1093/clinchem/47.2.331Suche in Google Scholar

16. Hattori N, Ishihara T, Saiki Y. Macroprolactinaemia: prevalence and aetiologies in a large group of hospital workers. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;71:702–8.10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03570.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Ismail AA, Walker PL, Cawood ML, Barth JH. Interference in immunoassay is an underestimated problem. Ann Clin Biochem 2002;39:366–73.10.1258/000456302760042128Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-01-19
Accepted: 2018-03-13
Published Online: 2018-04-09
Published in Print: 2018-07-26

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Procalcitonin for diagnosing and monitoring bacterial infections: for or against?
  4. Is it time to abandon the Nobel Prize?
  5. In Memoriam
  6. Norbert Tietz, 13th November 1926–23rd May 2018
  7. Reviews
  8. Procalcitonin guidance in patients with lower respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  9. Telomere biology and age-related diseases
  10. Opinion Paper
  11. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy: an expert consensus
  12. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  13. mRNA expression profile in peripheral blood mononuclear cells based on ADRB1 Ser49Gly and Arg389Gly polymorphisms in essential hypertension — a case-control pilot investigation in South Indian population
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. External quality assessment schemes for glucose measurements in Germany: factors for successful participation, analytical performance and medical impact
  16. Long-term stability of glucose: glycolysis inhibitor vs. gel barrier tubes
  17. Observational studies on macroprolactin in a routine clinical laboratory
  18. Anti-streptavidin IgG antibody interference in anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) IgG antibody assays is a rare but important cause of false-positive anti-CCP results
  19. Point-of-care creatinine testing for kidney function measurement prior to contrast-enhanced diagnostic imaging: evaluation of the performance of three systems for clinical utility
  20. Hematology and Coagulation
  21. Analytical performance of an automated volumetric flow cytometer for quantitation of T, B and natural killer lymphocytes
  22. Lupus anticoagulant testing using two parallel methods detects additional cases and predicts persistent positivity
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Within-subject biological variation of activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, factor VIII and von Willebrand factor in pregnant women
  25. Within-subject and between-subject biological variation estimates of 21 hematological parameters in 30 healthy subjects
  26. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG subclass reference intervals in children, using Optilite® reagents
  27. Cancer Diagnostics
  28. Serum carbohydrate sulfotransferase 7 in lung cancer and non-malignant pulmonary inflammations
  29. Cardiovascular Diseases
  30. Clinical performance of a new point-of-care cardiac troponin I test
  31. Diabetes
  32. Testing for HbA1c, in addition to the oral glucose tolerance test, in screening for abnormal glucose regulation helps to reveal patients with early β-cell function impairment
  33. Effects of common hemoglobin variants on HbA1c measurements in China: results for α- and β-globin variants measured by six methods
  34. Infectious Diseases
  35. Serum procalcitonin concentration within 2 days postoperatively accurately predicts outcome after liver resection
  36. Predictive value of serum gelsolin and Gc globulin in sepsis – a pilot study
  37. Cerebrospinal fluid free light chains as diagnostic biomarker in neuroborreliosis
  38. Letter to the Editor
  39. Glucose and total protein: unacceptable interference on Jaffe creatinine assays in patients
  40. Interference of glucose and total protein on Jaffe-based creatinine methods: mind the covolume
  41. Interference of glucose and total protein on Jaffe based creatinine methods: mind the covolume – reply
  42. Measuring procalcitonin to overcome heterophilic-antibody-induced spurious hypercalcitoninemia
  43. Paraprotein interference in the diagnosis of hepatitis C infection
  44. Timeo apis mellifera and dona ferens: bee sting-induced Kounis syndrome
  45. Bacterial contamination of reusable venipuncture tourniquets in tertiary-care hospital
  46. Detection of EDTA-induced pseudo-leukopenia using automated hematology analyzer with VCS technology
  47. Early adjustment of antimicrobial therapy after PCR/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry-based pathogen detection in critically ill patients with suspected sepsis
  48. Thromboelastometry reveals similar hemostatic properties of purified fibrinogen and a mixture of purified cryoprecipitate protein components
  49. Bicarbonate interference on cobas 6000 c501 chloride ion-selective electrodes
Heruntergeladen am 24.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0074/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen