Startseite On the Equilibrium Uniqueness in Cournot Competition with Demand Uncertainty
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

On the Equilibrium Uniqueness in Cournot Competition with Demand Uncertainty

  • Stefanos Leonardos ORCID logo EMAIL logo und Costis Melolidakis
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. Februar 2020

Abstract

We revisit the linear Cournot model with uncertain demand that is studied in Lagerlöf (2006. “Equilibrium Uniqueness in a Cournot Model with Demand Uncertainty.” The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 6, no. 1. (Topics), Article 19: 1–6.) and provide sufficient conditions for equilibrium uniqueness that complement the existing results. We show that if the distribution of the demand intercept has the decreasing mean residual demand (DMRD) or the increasing generalized failure rate (IGFR) property, then uniqueness of equilibrium is guaranteed. The DMRD condition implies log-concavity of the expected profits per unit of output without additional assumptions on the existence or the shape of the density of the demand intercept and, hence, answers in the affirmative the conjecture of Lagerlöf (2006. “Equilibrium Uniqueness in a Cournot Model with Demand Uncertainty.” The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 6, no. 1. (Topics), Article 19: 1–6.) that such conditions may not be necessary.

JEL Classification: C7

Acknowledgements

The authors thank an anonymous reviewer for the quality of their reports and their invaluable feedback, comments and corrections which considerably improved the final version of the paper. Stefanos Leonardos gratefully acknowledges support by a scholarship of the Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation.

References

Amir, R., and V. E. Lambson. 2000. “On the Effects of Entry in Cournot Markets.” The Review of Economic Studies 67: 235–54.10.1111/1467-937X.00129Suche in Google Scholar

Bagnoli, M., and T. Bergstrom. 2005. “Log-Concave Probability and Its Applications.” Economic Theory 26: 445–69.10.1007/3-540-29578-X_11Suche in Google Scholar

Banciu, M., and P. Mirchandani. 2013. “Technical Note – New Results Concerning Probability Distributions with Increasing Generalized Failure Rates.” Operations Research 61: 925–31.10.1287/opre.2013.1198Suche in Google Scholar

Belzunce, F., J. Candel, and J. M. Ruiz. 1998. “Ordering and Asymptotic Properties of Residual Income Distributions.” Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B (1960-2002) 60: 331–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Colombo, L., and P. Labrecciosa. 2012. “A Note on Pricing with Risk Aversion.” European Journal of Operational Research 216: 252–54.10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.027Suche in Google Scholar

Gupta, R. C., and A. Olcay. 1995. “Mean Residual Life Function for Certain Types of Non-monotonic Ageing.” Communications in Statistics. Stochastic Models 11: 219–25.10.1080/15326349508807340Suche in Google Scholar

Lagerlöf, J. N. M. 2006. “Equilibrium Uniqueness in a Cournot Model with Demand Uncertainty.” The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 6, no. 1. (Topics), Article 19: 1–6.10.2202/1534-598X.1333Suche in Google Scholar

Lagerlöf, J. N. M. 2007. “Insisting on a Non-negative Price: Oligopoly, Uncertainty, Welfare, and Multiple Equilibria.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 25: 861–75.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

Lai, C.-D., and M. Xie. 2006. Stochastic Ageing and Dependence for Reliability. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. New York: Springer Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Lariviere, M. A. 1999. “Supply Chain Contracting and Coordination with Stochastic Demand.” In Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, edited by S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, and M. Magazine, 233–268. Boston, MA: Springer US.10.1007/978-1-4615-4949-9_8Suche in Google Scholar

Lariviere, M. A. 2006. “A Note on Probability Distributions with Increasing Generalized Failure Rates.” Operations Research 54: 602–04.10.1287/opre.1060.0282Suche in Google Scholar

Leonardos, S., and C. Melolidakis. 2018. “A Class of Distributions for Linear Demand Markets.” ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.06327.Suche in Google Scholar

Leonardos, S., C. Melolidakis, and C. Koki. 2017. “Monopoly Pricing in a Vertical Market with Demand Uncertainty.” ArXiv e-prints.Suche in Google Scholar

Nadarajah, S. 2009. “Bathtub-Shaped Failure Rate Functions.” Quality & Quantity 43: 855–63.10.1007/s11135-007-9152-9Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, E., and X. Li. 2019. “Analytical Results for IGFR and DRPFR Distributions, with Actuarial Applications.” Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 48: 178–202.10.1080/03610926.2015.1082591Suche in Google Scholar

Paul, A. 2005. “A Note on Closure Properties of Failure Rate Distributions.” Operations Research 53: 733–34.10.1287/opre.1040.0206Suche in Google Scholar

Shaked, M., and G. Shanthikumar. 2007. Stochastic Orders. New York: Springer Series in Statistics.10.1007/978-0-387-34675-5Suche in Google Scholar

Van den Berg, G. J. 2007. “On the Uniqueness of Optimal Prices Set by Monopolistic Sellers.” Journal of Econometrics 141: 482–91.10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.10.005Suche in Google Scholar

Vives, X. 2001. Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-02-19

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 18.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejte-2019-0131/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen