Does Post-truth Expand or Restrict Political Choice? Politics, Planning, and Expertise in a Post-truth Environment

References

Baldas, T. 2022. “Whitmer Kidnap Trial Heats Up: Key FBI Informant Testifies about Bombs, Boats, Surveillance.” Detroit Free Press, Mar 19.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernal, J. D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. New York: Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Berreby, D. 1994. “And Now, Overcoming All Binary Oppositions, It’s... That Damned Elusive Bruno Latour.” Lingua Franca 4 (6).Suche in Google Scholar

Blyth, M. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139087230Suche in Google Scholar

Böhme, G., W. van den Daele, R. Hohlfeld, W. Krohn, and S. Wolf. 1983. Finalization in Science: The Social Orientation of Scientific Progress. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-7080-9Suche in Google Scholar

Bradford, J. H. 2012. “Capital, the State, and the Monetary Mode of Power: A Review of Nitzan and Bichler’s Capital as Power.” Review of Political Economy 24 (4): 643–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2012.701932.Suche in Google Scholar

Brewer, J. 1989. The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783. London: Unwin Hyman.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, P., S. McCormick, B. Mayer, S. Zavestoski, R. Morello-Frosch, R. G. Altman, and L. Senier. 2006. “‘A Lab of Our Own’: Environmental Causation of Breast Cancer and Challenges to the Dominant Epidemiological Paradigm.” Science, Technology & Human Values 31 (5): 499–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906289610.Suche in Google Scholar

Browning, G. K. 2000. “Marx’s Doctoral Dissertation: The Development of a Hegelian Thesis.” In The Hegel-Marx Connection, edited by T. Burns, and I. Fraser, 131–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230595934_6Suche in Google Scholar

Cartwright, N., J. Cat, L. Fleck, and T. E. Uebel. 1996. Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511598241Suche in Google Scholar

Chubin, D. E., and S. Restivo. 1983. “The ‘Mooting’ of Science Studies: Research Programmes and Science Policy.” In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, Vol. 55–83, edited by K. Knorr-Cetina, and M. Mulkay, London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Cleaver, H. 1979. Reading Capital Politically. Austin: University of Texas Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, H. M., and R. Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, H. 2014. Are We All Scientific Experts Now? Cambridge, Eng.: Polity.Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, R. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Connors, L., and W. Mitchell. 2017. “Framing Modern Monetary Theory.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 40: 239–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2016.1262746.Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, M. 2020. “Trench Warfare: Notes on the 2020 Election.” New Left Review 126 (November-December).Suche in Google Scholar

Epstein, S. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Pure Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520921252Suche in Google Scholar

Flam, F. 2022. “Censorship Isn’t the Best Way to Crack Down on Quack Science.” The Washington Post, February 1.Suche in Google Scholar

Fuller, S. 1988. Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fuller, S. 1989. Philosophy of Science and its Discontents. Boulder: Westview Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fuller, S. 2018. “Why There is Less between Social Democracy and Neoliberalism than Meets the Eye.” EUROPP, August 10.Suche in Google Scholar

Fuller, S. 2020. A Player’s Guide to the Post-Truth Condition: The Name of the Game. London: Anthem.Suche in Google Scholar

Fuller, S. 2021. “Symmetry as a Guide to Post-truth Times: A Response to Lynch.” Analyse & Kritik 43 (2): 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2021-0023.Suche in Google Scholar

Fuller, S., and J. H. Collier. 2004. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: A New Beginning for Science and Technology Studies, 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410609625Suche in Google Scholar

Gautney, H. 2018. “Dear Democratic Party: It’s Time to Stop Rigging the Primaries.” The Guardian, June 11.Suche in Google Scholar

Ghosh, A. 2016. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226323176.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Graeber, D. 2011. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York: Melville House.Suche in Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1992. “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by A. Pickering, 29–64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Haidt, J., and T. Rose-Stockwell. 2019. “The Dark Psychology of Social Networks.” The Atlantic, December.Suche in Google Scholar

Harding, S. 1991. “Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?” In Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501712951Suche in Google Scholar

Heath, J. 2021. “Post-deliberative Democracy.” Analyse & Kritik 43 (2): 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2021-0019.Suche in Google Scholar

Henrich, N., and J. Henrich. 2007. Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195300680.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Hollander, S. 2011. Friedrich Engels and Marxian Political Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977466Suche in Google Scholar

Houseman, S. N. 2018. “Understanding the Decline of U.S. Manufacturing Employment.” In Upjohn Institute Working Paper 18-287. Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp18-287.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, P. 1995. “Two Letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kühn on a Draft of the Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (3): 353–87.10.1016/0039-3681(95)00005-8Suche in Google Scholar

Hudson, M. 2018. ... And Forgive Them Their Debts: Lending, Foreclosure and Redemption from Bronze Age Finance to the Jubilee Year. Dresden: ISLET.Suche in Google Scholar

Hudson, M. 2020. The Use and Abuse of MMT. April 10.Suche in Google Scholar

James, C. L. R., R. Dunayevskaya, and G. Lee Boggs. 1947. Trotskyism in the United States, 1940-1947: Balance Sheet. Marxist Internet Archive.Suche in Google Scholar

Jameson, F. 1983. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203983942Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, D. S. 2012. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1985. Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195145836.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 2002. “Reply to Helen Longino.” Philosophy of Science 69 (4): 569–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/344619.Suche in Google Scholar

LaCapra, D. 1998. History and Memory after Auschwitz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501727450Suche in Google Scholar

Lakatos, I., and P. Feyerabend. 1999. For and Against Method: Including Lakatos’ Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence, edited by M. Motterlini, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226467030.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World.” In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, edited by K. Knorr-Cetina, and M. Mulkay. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1988. “The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative.” In Knowledge and Reflexivity, edited by S. Woolgar, 155–76. Newbury Park: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1996. Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400820412Suche in Google Scholar

Lau, T. 2019. “Citizens United Explained.” Brennan Center for Justice, December 12.Suche in Google Scholar

Laudan, L. 1977. Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Laudan, L., A. Donovan, R. Laudan, P. Barker, H. Brown, J. Leplin, T. Paul, and S. Wykstra. 1986. “Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research.” Synthese 69 (2): 141–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00413981.Suche in Google Scholar

Leonhardt, D. 2021. “Red Covid.” New York Times, September 27.Suche in Google Scholar

Lerer, L., and R. J. Epstein. 2020. “Democratic Leaders Willing to Risk Party Damage to Stop Bernie Sanders.” The New York Times, February 27.Suche in Google Scholar

Livergood, N. D. 1967. Activity in Marx’s Philosophy. The Hague: Martnis Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-017-5059-2Suche in Google Scholar

Longino, H. E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691209753Suche in Google Scholar

Longino, H. E. 2002. “Science and the Common Good: Thoughts on Philip Kitcher’s Science, Truth, and Democracy.” Philosophy of Science 69 (4): 560. https://doi.org/10.1086/344618.Suche in Google Scholar

Lynch, W. T. 1994. “Ideology and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 24 (2): 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631279402400202.Suche in Google Scholar

Lynch, W. T. 2003. “Beyond Cold War Paradigms for Science and Democracy.” Minerva 41: 365–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mine.0000005159.50541.9b.10.1023/B:MINE.0000005159.50541.9bSuche in Google Scholar

Lynch, W. T. 2017. “Cultural Evolution and Social Epistemology: A Darwinian Alternative to Steve Fuller’s Theodicy of Science.” Social Epistemology 31 (2): 224–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2016.1227397.Suche in Google Scholar

Lynch, W. T. 2019. “Between Kin Selection and Cultural Relativism: Cultural Evolution and the Origin of Inequality.” Perspectives on Science 27 (2): 278–315. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00308.Suche in Google Scholar

Lynch, W. T. 2020. “Science and Socialism in the Time of Coronavirus.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (10): 16–25.Suche in Google Scholar

Lynch, W. T. 2021. Minority Report: Dissent and Diversity in Science. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar

Lynch, W. T., and E. R. Fuhrman. 1991. “Recovering and Expanding the Normative: Marx and the New Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Science, Technology & Human Values 16: 233–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600206.Suche in Google Scholar

Mah, H. 1987. The End of Philosophy, the Origin of ‘Ideology’: Karl Marx and the Crisis of the Young Hegelians. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Malter, J. 2019. Bernie Sanders’ 2016 Economic Advisor Stephanie Kelton on Modern Monetary Theory and the 2020 Race. CNBC.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, B. 1993. “The Critique of Science becomes Academic.” Science, Technology & Human Values 18 (2): 247–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800208.Suche in Google Scholar

Marx, K. 2001. The German Ideology. London: Electric Book Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1971. The Cologne Communist Trial. New York: International Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, W. H. 1982. The Pursuit of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226160191.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, S. A., and S. McLaughlin. 2020. “Why Bernie Bros Believe the Democratic Primary is Rigged against Sanders.” Washington Times, March 5.Suche in Google Scholar

Mins, H. F. 1948. “Marx’s Doctoral Dissertation.” Science & Society 12 (1): 157–69.Suche in Google Scholar

Mirowski, P. 2011. Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674061132Suche in Google Scholar

Mirowski, P. 2014. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.Suche in Google Scholar

Mirowski, P., and D. Plehwe. 2015. The Road From Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674495111Suche in Google Scholar

Mudge, S. L. 2008. “What is Neo-Liberalism?” Socio-Economic Review 6 (4): 703–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn016.Suche in Google Scholar

Noëlle, McAfee. 2008. Democracy and the Political Unconscious. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/mcaf13880Suche in Google Scholar

Nye, M. J. 2011. Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226610658.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Oreskes, N. 2021. “Naomi Oreskes: Dichron Interview.” Disinformation Chronicle, Paul D. Thacker, interviewer. Feb. 10.Suche in Google Scholar

Oreskes, N., and E. Conway. 2014. The Collapse of Western Civilization: A View from the Future. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/columbia/9780231169547.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Reisch, G. A. 1994. “Planning Science: Otto Neurath and the ‘International Encyclopedia of Unified Science’.” The British Journal for the History of Science 27 (93): 153–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087400031873.Suche in Google Scholar

Rider, S. 2019. “Modal Power, Self-Conscious Science, and the Critique of Epistemic Paternalism, or How to Change Your Mind: An Interview with Steve Fuller.” Disputatio 8 (11): 597–615.Suche in Google Scholar

Rommetveit, K. 2021. “Post-truth - Another Fork in Modernity’s Path.” In Post-truth Imaginations: New Starting Points for Critique of Politics and Technoscience, edited by K. Rommetveit, 1–30. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429053061-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, S. 2021. “Are We Really Past Truth? A Historian’s Perspective.” Analyse & Kritik 43 (2): 265–83.10.1515/auk-2021-0022Suche in Google Scholar

San Juan, D. M. 2020. Responding to COVID-19 Through Socialist(ic) Measures: A Preliminary Review. March 23.10.2139/ssrn.3559398Suche in Google Scholar

Snyder, T. 2021. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. Canada: Ten Speed Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Söderberg, J. 2018. “A Response to Steve Fuller: The Differences between Social Democracy and Neoliberalism.” In EUROPP. August 21.Suche in Google Scholar

Söderberg, J. 2022. “The Moment of Post-Truth for Science and Technology Studies.” In Post-truth Imaginations: New Starting Points for Critique of Politics and Technoscience, edited by K. Rommetveit, 86–110. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429053061-5Suche in Google Scholar

Soler, L., S. Zwart, M. Lynch, and V. Israel-Jost. 2014. Science After the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315857985Suche in Google Scholar

Spellman, W. M. 2020. A Concise History of the World since 1945. London: Red Grove Press.Suche in Google Scholar

van der Kolk, B. A. 2014. The Body Keeps Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Vinsel, L., and A. L. Russell. 2020. The Innovation Delusion: How Our Obsession with the New Has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most. New York: Currency.Suche in Google Scholar

Vishmidt, M. 2013. “Permanent Reproductive Crisis: An Interview with Silvia Federici.” Mute, March 7.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, D. S., S. C. Hayes, B. Anthony, and D. D. Embry. 2014. “Evolving the Future: Toward a Science of Intentional Change.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4): 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x13001593.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolgar, S. 1981. “Interests and Explanation in the Social Study of Science.” Social Studies of Science 11 (3): 365–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631278101100304.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, S. 2002. Storming Heaven: Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism. London: University of Michigan Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., J. Du, and Y. Wu. 2020. “The Impact of J. D. Bernal’s Thoughts in the Science of Science upon China: Implications for Today’s Quantitative Studies of Science.” Quantitative Science Studies 1 (3): 959–68. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00064.Suche in Google Scholar

Ziman, J. 2000. Real Science: What it Is, What it Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511541391Suche in Google Scholar