Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
Comment on John Foster
-
Anna Kusser
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
14. Mai 2016
Abstract
Modern environmental thought is characterized by a paradox. The value of environmental goods seems to transcend all purely human values. At the same time environmental goods have to be placed within an overall ranking if there is to be rational environmental policy. It is argued that J. Foster's concept of value-judgement cannot solve this paradox.
Published Online: 2016-05-14
Published in Print: 1994-11-01
© 1994 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Structured and Unstructured Valuation
- Beyond Costs and Benefits: Weighing Environmental Goods
- Comment on John Foster
- Sind alle Werte vergleichbar?
- Cost-Benefit Analysis and Procedural Values
- Comment on Douglas MacLean
- Trying to Find the Right Approach to Greenhouse Economics
- Comment on Clive L. Spash
- Preferences, Virtues, and Institutions
- Comment on John O’Neill
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Structured and Unstructured Valuation
- Beyond Costs and Benefits: Weighing Environmental Goods
- Comment on John Foster
- Sind alle Werte vergleichbar?
- Cost-Benefit Analysis and Procedural Values
- Comment on Douglas MacLean
- Trying to Find the Right Approach to Greenhouse Economics
- Comment on Clive L. Spash
- Preferences, Virtues, and Institutions
- Comment on John O’Neill
