Startseite Altertumswissenschaften & Ägyptologie Recognizing Miracles in ancient Greek Novels
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Recognizing Miracles in ancient Greek Novels

  • Donald Lateiner
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Ancient Greek novels deal in fantasies of horror and hope, mostly improbable possibilities such as survival of catastrophe and happy endings for the oft imperiled couple. Discussions of the nature of thaumata and the non-miracle miracle of “apparent death” (Scheintod) precede a survey of such happenings reported in the plasmata of Chariton, Xenophon of Ephesos, Achilles Tatios, Longos, and Heliodoros. Chariton’s “belief apparatus” allows Aphrodite’s interventions from afar, Xenophon reports several miracles baldly, Longos has many pastoral deities interfere in mundane matters, Tatios mocks miracles as he does so much else, and Heliodoros allows miracle-producing objects (a ring, an embroidered band), persons (thaumaturges), and nick-of-time divine redirections. At the same time this last author satirizes miracle-mongering charlatans (e. g., Kalasiris) and credulous audiences (Hellenic and barbarian). The historicizing novelist gives limited but real credence to oracles, dreams, and deus ex machina theophanies. The essay examines contemporary Imperial texts addressing miracles such as Philostratos’ Vita Apollonii, Lucian’s Alexander and Proteus, and Christian Gospels and early hagiography. One concludes that miracles in the novel texts are rarer than one might expect, but they occur at a time in which miracles were (paradoxically) conceived to be ordinary, when few escapes from disaster were possible.

Abstract

Ancient Greek novels deal in fantasies of horror and hope, mostly improbable possibilities such as survival of catastrophe and happy endings for the oft imperiled couple. Discussions of the nature of thaumata and the non-miracle miracle of “apparent death” (Scheintod) precede a survey of such happenings reported in the plasmata of Chariton, Xenophon of Ephesos, Achilles Tatios, Longos, and Heliodoros. Chariton’s “belief apparatus” allows Aphrodite’s interventions from afar, Xenophon reports several miracles baldly, Longos has many pastoral deities interfere in mundane matters, Tatios mocks miracles as he does so much else, and Heliodoros allows miracle-producing objects (a ring, an embroidered band), persons (thaumaturges), and nick-of-time divine redirections. At the same time this last author satirizes miracle-mongering charlatans (e. g., Kalasiris) and credulous audiences (Hellenic and barbarian). The historicizing novelist gives limited but real credence to oracles, dreams, and deus ex machina theophanies. The essay examines contemporary Imperial texts addressing miracles such as Philostratos’ Vita Apollonii, Lucian’s Alexander and Proteus, and Christian Gospels and early hagiography. One concludes that miracles in the novel texts are rarer than one might expect, but they occur at a time in which miracles were (paradoxically) conceived to be ordinary, when few escapes from disaster were possible.

Heruntergeladen am 24.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110563559-019/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen