Perception of Japanese Pitch Accent without F0
-
Yukiko Sugiyama
Abstract
Phonological contrasts are typically encoded with multiple acoustic correlates to ensure efficient communication. Studies have shown that such phonetic redundancy is found not only in segmental contrasts, but also in suprasegmental contrasts such as tone. In Japanese, fundamental frequency (F0) is the primary cue for pitch accent. However, little is known about its secondary cues. In the present study, a perception experiment was conducted to examine whether any secondary cues exist for Japanese accent. First, minimal pairs of final-accented and unaccented words were identified using a database, resulting in 14 pairs of words. These words were then produced by a native Tokyo Japanese speaker, and presented to participants in both unedited and edited forms. Edited speech stimuli were created by replacing F0 in the natural speech stimuli with white noise. While word identification by Tokyo Japanese speakers had higher accuracy for natural speech than for edited speech, the accuracy exceeded the chance level for edited speech, suggesting the existence of secondary cues for Japanese accent. Acoustic analysis of the stimuli revealed that relative mean amplitude and relative maximum amplitude were greater for final-accented words than for unaccented words.
verified
References
1 Abramson AS (1972): Tonal experiments with whispered Thai. Pap Linguist Phon Mem Pierre Delattre 54:31-44.10.1515/9783110803877-004Suche in Google Scholar
2 Amano S, Kondo T (1999): Nihongo no goitokusei. Tokyo, Sanseido.Suche in Google Scholar
3 Amano S, Kondo T, Kato K (1999): Familiarity effect on spoken word recognition in Japanese. Proc 14th ICPhS, San Francisco, vol 2, pp 873-876.Suche in Google Scholar
4 Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014): lme4: linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. R package version 1.1-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.Suche in Google Scholar
5 Beckman ME (1986): Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht, Foris.10.1515/9783110874020Suche in Google Scholar
6 Bias (2009): Peak. Computer program, version 6 (LE). http://www.bias-inc.com.Suche in Google Scholar
7 Boersma P, Weenink D (2011): Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Computer program. http://www.praat.org.Suche in Google Scholar
8 Cedrus (2009): SuperLab. Computer program. http://www.superlab.com.Suche in Google Scholar
9 Culter A, Otake T (1999): Pitch-accent in spoken word recognition in Japanese. J Acoust Soc Am 105:1877-1888.10.1121/1.426724Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
10 Fry DB (1955): Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. J Acoust Soc Am 27:765-768.10.1121/1.1908022Suche in Google Scholar
11 Fu Q-J, Zeng F-G (2000): Identification of temporal envelope cues in Chinese tone recognition. Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hear 5:45-57.10.1179/136132800807547582Suche in Google Scholar
12 Higashikawa M, Nakai K, Sakakura A, Takahashi H (1996): Perceived pitch of whispered vowels - relationship with formant frequencies: a preliminary study. J Voice 10:155-158.10.1016/S0892-1997(96)80042-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
13 Inoue F (1998): Nihongo Uocchingu (in Japanese). Tokyo, Iwanami.Suche in Google Scholar
14 Kaiki N, Takeda K, Sagisaka Y (1992): Vowel duration control using linguistic information. J IEICE J75-A:467-473.Suche in Google Scholar
15 Kallail K, Emanuel F (1984): Formant-frequency differences between isolated whispered and phonated vowel samples produced by adult female subjects. J Speech Hear Res 27:245-251.10.1044/jshr.2702.251Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
16 Kingston J, Diehl RL (1994): Phonetic knowledge. Language 70:419-454.10.2307/416481Suche in Google Scholar
17 Kitahara M (2001): Category Structure and Function of Pitch Accent in Tokyo Japanese; PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Suche in Google Scholar
18 Kloster Jensen M (1958): Recognition of word tones in whispered speech. Word 14:187-196.10.1080/00437956.1958.11659663Suche in Google Scholar
19 Kluender KR, Lotto AJ (1999): Virtues and perils of an empiricist approach to speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 105:503-511.10.1121/1.424587Suche in Google Scholar
20 Kochanski G, Grabe E, Coleman J, Rosner B (2005): Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. J Acoust Soc Am 118:1038-1054.10.1121/1.1923349Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
21 Kubozono H (1993): The Organization of Japanese Prosody. Tokyo, Kuroshio.Suche in Google Scholar
22 Lehiste I (1970): Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
23 Liu S, Samuel AG (2004): Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when F0 information is neutralized. Lang Speech 47:109-138.10.1177/00238309040470020101Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
24 Meyer-Eppler W (1957): Realization of prosodic features in whispered speech. J Acoust Soc Am 29:104-106.10.1121/1.1905013Suche in Google Scholar
25 Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2004): Detection Theory: A User's Guide, ed 2. Cambridge, Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410611147Suche in Google Scholar
26 Miller JD (1961): Word tone recognition in Vietnamese whispered speech. Word 17:11-15.10.1080/00437956.1961.11659743Suche in Google Scholar
27 Nearey TM (1997): Speech perception as pattern recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 101:3241-3254.10.1121/1.418290Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
28 Neustupný JV (1978): Post-Structural Approaches to Language: Language Theory in a Japanese Context. Tokyo, University of Tokyo Press.Suche in Google Scholar
29 R Core Team (2014): R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Suche in Google Scholar
30 Stevens KN, Keyser SJ, Kawasaki H (1986): Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features; in Perkell JS, Klatt DH (eds): Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, pp 426-449.10.2307/1422414Suche in Google Scholar
31 Stevens KN, Klatt DH (1974): Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. J Acoust Soc Am 55:653-659.10.1121/1.1914578Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
32 Sugito M (1982): Tookyoo akusento ni okeru “hana” to “hana” no seisei to chikaku; in Sugito M (ed): Nihongo akusento no kenkyuu (in Japanese). Tokyo, Sanseido, pp 182-201.Suche in Google Scholar
33 Sugito M, Higashikawa M, Sakakura A, Takahashi H (1991): Perceptual, acoustical, and physiological study of Japanese word accent in whispered speech. IEICE Tech Rep 91:1-8.Suche in Google Scholar
34 Sugiyama Y (2008): The Nature of Japanese Pitch Accent: An experimental study; PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.Suche in Google Scholar
35 Sugiyama Y (2014): Formant frequencies as a possible correlate of Japanese accent. Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, pp 41-55.Suche in Google Scholar
36 Tanaka S, Kubozono H (1999): Nihongo no hatsuon kyooshitsu (in Japanese). Tokyo, Kuroshio Shuppan.Suche in Google Scholar
37 Tanaka Y (2010): Shutoken ni okeru gengodootai no kenkyuu (in Japanese). Tokyo, Kasamashoin.Suche in Google Scholar
38 Thomas IB (1969): Perceived pitch of whispered vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 46: 468-470.10.1121/1.1911712Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
39 Vance TJ (1995): Final accent vs no accent: utterance-final neutralization in Tokyo Japanese. J Phon 23:487-499.10.1006/jpho.1995.0035Suche in Google Scholar
40 Weitzman RS (1970): Word Accent in Japanese. Detroit, Management Information Services.Suche in Google Scholar
41 Whalen DH, Xu Y (1992): Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica 49:25-47.10.1159/000261901Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
42 Wright R (1997): Lexical Competition and Reduction in Speech: A Preliminary Report (Progress Report No 21). Bloomington, Speech Research Laboratory.Suche in Google Scholar
43 Zee E (1980): Tone and vowel quality. J Phon 8:247-258.10.1121/1.2016211Suche in Google Scholar
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Front and Back Matter
- Front & Back Matter
- Original Paper
- The Accentual Phrase in Singapore English
- Stress Effects in Vowel Perception as a Function of Language-Specific Vocabulary Patterns
- Perception of Japanese Pitch Accent without F0
- Further Section
- Publications Received for Review
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Front and Back Matter
- Front & Back Matter
- Original Paper
- The Accentual Phrase in Singapore English
- Stress Effects in Vowel Perception as a Function of Language-Specific Vocabulary Patterns
- Perception of Japanese Pitch Accent without F0
- Further Section
- Publications Received for Review
