Chapter 10. [N1 + N2], [N + A], and [N1 + de + N2]
-
Kentaro Koga
Abstract
[N1 + N2], [N1 + A], and [N1 + P + N2] constructions have a function of naming subcategories of the concept indicated by the N1. [N1 + A] and [N1 + P + N2] constructions are considered as lexicalized syntactic units, whereas [N1 + N2] constructions cannot be formed by syntactic rules. The formation of [N1 + N2] constructions is based on a model created by an analogy from existent binominal constructions. The three types of constructions under investigation can establish a tripartite competition, but such cases do not always occur, because of the conditional productivity of [N1 + N2], the lack of adjectival form and restrictions on the formation of [N1 + de + N2].
Abstract
[N1 + N2], [N1 + A], and [N1 + P + N2] constructions have a function of naming subcategories of the concept indicated by the N1. [N1 + A] and [N1 + P + N2] constructions are considered as lexicalized syntactic units, whereas [N1 + N2] constructions cannot be formed by syntactic rules. The formation of [N1 + N2] constructions is based on a model created by an analogy from existent binominal constructions. The three types of constructions under investigation can establish a tripartite competition, but such cases do not always occur, because of the conditional productivity of [N1 + N2], the lack of adjectival form and restrictions on the formation of [N1 + de + N2].
Kapitel in diesem Buch
- 日本言語政策学会 / Japan Association for Language Policy. 言語政策 / Language Policy 10. 2014 i
- Table of contents v
- Chapter 1. Towards a competition-based word-formation theory 1
-
Part 1. Competition in affixation
- Chapter 2. A lexicalist approach to affixal rivalry and its explanatory basis 34
- Chapter 3. Actional nominalization in Present-Day English in the light of the Referenced Index of Competition 72
- Chapter 4. Measuring affix rivalry as a gradient relationship 104
- Chapter 5. Exploring linguistic competition in English derivatives ending in ‑ ie and ‑ o through a cognitive-onomasiological approach 139
- Chapter 6. Diminutive formation in Modern Greek 176
-
Part 2. Macro-level competition, the lexicon and its interfaces
- Chapter 7. Competition between affixation and conversion in Present-Day English denominal verbs 208
- Chapter 8. A diachronic perspective on competition in denominal verb formation in Italian 247
- Chapter 9. Competition of lexicon vs. pragmatics in word formation 275
- Chapter 10. [N1 + N2], [N + A], and [N1 + de + N2] 297
- Chapter 11. Revisiting Poser’s (1992) “Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items” from the perspective of the economy of language use principle 326
- Index 351
Kapitel in diesem Buch
- 日本言語政策学会 / Japan Association for Language Policy. 言語政策 / Language Policy 10. 2014 i
- Table of contents v
- Chapter 1. Towards a competition-based word-formation theory 1
-
Part 1. Competition in affixation
- Chapter 2. A lexicalist approach to affixal rivalry and its explanatory basis 34
- Chapter 3. Actional nominalization in Present-Day English in the light of the Referenced Index of Competition 72
- Chapter 4. Measuring affix rivalry as a gradient relationship 104
- Chapter 5. Exploring linguistic competition in English derivatives ending in ‑ ie and ‑ o through a cognitive-onomasiological approach 139
- Chapter 6. Diminutive formation in Modern Greek 176
-
Part 2. Macro-level competition, the lexicon and its interfaces
- Chapter 7. Competition between affixation and conversion in Present-Day English denominal verbs 208
- Chapter 8. A diachronic perspective on competition in denominal verb formation in Italian 247
- Chapter 9. Competition of lexicon vs. pragmatics in word formation 275
- Chapter 10. [N1 + N2], [N + A], and [N1 + de + N2] 297
- Chapter 11. Revisiting Poser’s (1992) “Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items” from the perspective of the economy of language use principle 326
- Index 351
