Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Chapter 2. Contrast is irrelevant in phonology
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chapter 2. Contrast is irrelevant in phonology

A simple account of Russian /v/ as /V/
  • Charles Reiss
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

Halle’s (1959) argument against a distinction between morphophonemic and phonemic rules can be understood as an argument against the relevance of contrast to phonology. After adducing further arguments against a role for contrast, the paper provides a simple contrast-free analysis of the classic problem of the voicing behavior of Russian /v/. This segment undergoes voicing assimilation (like other obstruents), but does not trigger it (thus acting like the sonorants). In contrast to a long history of treating /v/ as a covert sonorant, the paper attributes the behavior of Russian /v/, which surfaces always as an obstruent, to underspecification with respect to the feature Voice.

Abstract

Halle’s (1959) argument against a distinction between morphophonemic and phonemic rules can be understood as an argument against the relevance of contrast to phonology. After adducing further arguments against a role for contrast, the paper provides a simple contrast-free analysis of the classic problem of the voicing behavior of Russian /v/. This segment undergoes voicing assimilation (like other obstruents), but does not trigger it (thus acting like the sonorants). In contrast to a long history of treating /v/ as a covert sonorant, the paper attributes the behavior of Russian /v/, which surfaces always as an obstruent, to underspecification with respect to the feature Voice.

Heruntergeladen am 9.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.241.02rei/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen