Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Categories and gradience in intonation
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Categories and gradience in intonation

A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study
  • Brechtje Post , Emmanuel A. Stamatakis , Iwo Bohr , Francis Nolan und Chris Cummins
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company
The Phonetics–Phonology Interface
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch The Phonetics–Phonology Interface

Abstract

The Autosegmental-Metrical framework (AM) assumes that a distinction needs to be made between linguistic phonological information (categorical) and paralinguistic phonetic information (gradient) in intonation. However, empirical evidence supporting this assumption has proved to be elusive so far. In this study we analysed whether the theoretical distinction is reflected in perceptual biases and neural activation in the brain. The results of a combined behavioural and neuroimaging study demonstrate that intonational function indeed activates different but overlapping neural networks with more widespread activation for categorical phonological stimuli, especially in middle temporal gyrus bilaterally and left supramarginal and inferior parietal areas. In contrast, for paralinguistic gradient stimuli activation is restricted to right inferior frontal gyrus. These neural differences mirror differences in response times in a listening experiment testing categorical perception for the same stimuli. These findings support a theoretical model of intonation, such as AM, in which linguistic and paralinguistic information are distinguished.

Abstract

The Autosegmental-Metrical framework (AM) assumes that a distinction needs to be made between linguistic phonological information (categorical) and paralinguistic phonetic information (gradient) in intonation. However, empirical evidence supporting this assumption has proved to be elusive so far. In this study we analysed whether the theoretical distinction is reflected in perceptual biases and neural activation in the brain. The results of a combined behavioural and neuroimaging study demonstrate that intonational function indeed activates different but overlapping neural networks with more widespread activation for categorical phonological stimuli, especially in middle temporal gyrus bilaterally and left supramarginal and inferior parietal areas. In contrast, for paralinguistic gradient stimuli activation is restricted to right inferior frontal gyrus. These neural differences mirror differences in response times in a listening experiment testing categorical perception for the same stimuli. These findings support a theoretical model of intonation, such as AM, in which linguistic and paralinguistic information are distinguished.

Heruntergeladen am 17.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.335.13pos/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen