The paper addresses the way in which modern linguistics, – in particular, but not exclusively, the generative tradition –, has constructed its core concepts. It argues that a particular form of construction, reminiscent of, but crucially different from, abstraction, which is dubbed ‘idealisation’, plays a central role here. The resemblances and differences between abstractions and idealisations are investigated, and consequences of the reliance on idealisations are reviewed.
Issue
Open Access
Volume 37, Issue 1-2 - Abstractions and idealisations: The construction of modern linguistics
Contents
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedAbstractions and idealisations: The construction of modern linguisticsLicensedAugust 3, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedTaking a broader view: Abstraction and idealizationLicensedAugust 3, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedPostmodern linguistics and the prospects of neural syntax: Some polemical remarksLicensedAugust 3, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedThe language system is abstract but cannot be understood without its social functionsLicensedAugust 3, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedIn defense of idealizations: A commentary on Stokhof and van LambalgenLicensedAugust 3, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedThe Stokhof - van Lambalgen paradox resolvedLicensedAugust 3, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedMeta-meta-linguisticsLicensedAugust 3, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedComments-to-commentsLicensedAugust 3, 2011