Functional similarities between the expression of reportative evidentiality and the grammatical representation of reported speech manifest themselves in varying degrees of corresponding formal similarity across languages. Assuming a systematic correlation between these domains this paper investigates and compares two likely sources for the expression of reportative evidentiality: non-referential reportative matrix clauses with generic utterance verbs and functionally specialized dependent clauses. The argument is based primarily on parallels in the development from biclausal to monoclausal structures in a number of genetically and areally diverse languages.
Contents
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedReported speech constructions and the grammaticalization of hearsay evidentiality: a cross-linguistic surveyLicensedSeptember 22, 2010
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedThe noun phrase in Boruca: studying a recently extinct languageLicensedSeptember 22, 2010
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedTones and intonation in Prinmi – a first surveyLicensedSeptember 22, 2010
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedWhen ‘towards’ means ‘away from’: the case of directional-ablative syncretism in the Ardeşen variety of Laz (South-Caucasian)LicensedSeptember 22, 2010