It is standard in quantitative risk management to model a random vector 𝐗:={Xtk}k=1,...,d${\mathbf {X}:=\lbrace X_{t_k}\rbrace _{k=1,\ldots ,d}}$ of consecutive log-returns to ultimately analyze the probability law of the accumulated return Xt1+⋯+Xtd${X_{t_1}+\cdots +X_{t_d}}$. By the Markov regression representation (see [25]), any stochastic model for 𝐗${\mathbf {X}}$ can be represented as Xtk=fk(Xt1,...,Xtk-1,Uk)${X_{t_k}=f_k(X_{t_1},\ldots ,X_{t_{k-1}},U_k)}$, k=1,...,d${k=1,\ldots ,d}$, yielding a decomposition into a vector 𝐔:={Uk}k=1,...,d${\mathbf {U}:=\lbrace U_{k}\rbrace _{k=1,\ldots ,d}}$ of i.i.d. random variables accounting for the randomness in the model, and a function f:={fk}k=1,...,d${f:=\lbrace f_k\rbrace _{k=1,\ldots ,d}}$ representing the economic reasoning behind. For most models, f is known explicitly and U k may be interpreted as an exogenous risk factor affecting the return X t k in time step k . While existing literature addresses model uncertainty by manipulating the function f , we introduce a new philosophy by distorting the source of randomness 𝐔${\mathbf {U}}$ and interpret this as an analysis of the model's robustness. We impose consistency conditions for a reasonable distortion and present a suitable probability law and a stochastic representation for 𝐔${\mathbf {U}}$ based on a Dirichlet prior. The resulting framework has one parameter c∈[0,∞]${c\in [0,\infty ]}$ tuning the severity of the imposed distortion. The universal nature of the methodology is illustrated by means of a case study comparing the effect of the distortion to different models for 𝐗${\mathbf {X}}$. As a mathematical byproduct, the consistency conditions of the suggested distortion function reveal interesting insights into the dependence structure between samples from a Dirichlet prior.
