The Post-Cold War changes in the international system and the general march of globalization have led to a renewed interest in the optimal size of states. The most powerful theoretical models for understanding state size have come from models of the political and economic geography of cities. The classic Tiebout model has been used by a number of scholars to help understand the optimal area for the provision of a single abstract public good. I argue here for the use of the revision by Ostram, Tiebout, and Warren that emphasizes the polycentric nature of urban governance. This analogy better captures the variations in optimal size that may characterize different public goods. In so doing, it can help us better understand the simultaneous pressures for fragmentation and integration that are likely to characterize the twenty-first century.
Contents
- Article
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedCity-State Redux: Rethinking Optimal State Size in an Age of GlobalizationLicensedApril 13, 2009
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedLondon in the Global Telecommunication Network of the Nineteenth CenturyLicensedApril 13, 2009
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedEconomic and Fertility Policies in an Era of Globalization: A Comparison of Ireland and SingaporeLicensedApril 13, 2009
- Commentary
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedTransforming Today's Students into Tomorrow's Global Citizens: Challenges for U.S. EducatorsLicensedApril 13, 2009
- Documentation
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedTime for a New Global Currency?LicensedApril 13, 2009
- Review Essay
-
Requires Authentication Unlicensed'National' and 'Global' Political Islam: Three Books by Olivier RoyLicensedApril 13, 2009
- Book Review
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedReview of God Needs No Passport: Immigrants and the Changing American Religious LandscapeLicensedApril 13, 2009