Band 12, Heft 2

The majority of methods for constructing pairing-friendly elliptic curves are based on representing the curve parameters as polynomial families. There are three such types, namely complete, complete with variable discriminant and sparse families. In this paper, we present a method for constructing sparse families and produce examples of this type that have not previously appeared in the literature, for various embedding degrees. We provide numerical examples obtained by these sparse families, considering for the first time the effect of the recent progress on the tower number field sieve (TNFS) method for solving the discrete logarithm problem (DLP) in finite field extensions of composite degree.

In 2004, Muzereau, Smart and Vercauteren [A. Muzereau, N. P. Smart and F. Vercauteren, The equivalence between the DHP and DLP for elliptic curves used in practical applications, LMS J. Comput. Math. 7 2004, 50–72] showed how to use a reduction algorithm of the discrete logarithm problem to Diffie–Hellman problem in order to estimate lower bound for the Diffie–Hellman problem on elliptic curves. They presented their estimates on various elliptic curves that are used in practical applications. In this paper, we show that a much tighter lower bound for the Diffie–Hellman problem on those curves can be achieved if one uses the multiplicative group of a finite field as auxiliary group. The improved lower bound estimates of the Diffie–Hellman problem on those recommended curves are also presented. Moreover, we have also extended our idea by presenting similar estimates of DHP on some more recommended curves which were not covered before. These estimates of DHP on these curves are currently the tightest which lead us towards the equivalence of the Diffie–Hellman problem and the discrete logarithm problem on these recommended elliptic curves.