This article is a libertarian critique of incest laws. On the basis of the libertarian “harm principle”, one must ask what exactly is the harm that incest brings forth. Traditionally, anthropologists have tried to rationalize the incest taboo in various theories, and lawmakers have used these principles as grounds for the criminalization of incest. These principles are the preservation of family structure, the enhancement of alliances and the avoidance of genetic risks. While I acknowledge that these rationalizations are plausible, I argue that they are still not sufficient grounds for the preservation of incest laws, and consequently, there is an ethical need to reform them.
Contents
-
Publicly AvailableA libertanian critique of incest laws: Philosophical and anthropological perspectivesApril 22, 2021
-
Publicly AvailableA moral analysis of intelligent decision-support systems in diagnostics through the lens of Luciano Floridi’s information ethicsApril 22, 2021
-
Publicly AvailableHappiness as an aim of educationApril 22, 2021
-
Publicly AvailableTo study or not to study abroad? students’ decision in perspective of motivations, barriers and attachmentApril 22, 2021
-
Publicly Available‘Baby factories’ versus the objectification of surrogacy cum child adoption in NigeriaApril 22, 2021
-
Publicly AvailableAnti-theodicies – An Adornian approachApril 22, 2021
-
Publicly AvailableAmerican slave narratives as autoethnographic paradigmApril 22, 2021