Defining AI Systems in the EU and Beyond
-
Theodoros Karathanasis
Abstract
The aim of this article is to assess the current global reach of the European Union’s regulatory influence on AI. This analysis focuses on how an “AI system” is defined in the final EU AI Act and presents the hypothesis that the more rigid the definition of AI systems is, the less global the reach of the EU AI Act’s standards will be, especially in countries with a strong tendency towards AI sovereignty. A qualitative comparative analysis of four case studies (Brazil, Canada, Chile, USA) reveals persistent divergences centred on the material scope of AI systems. In turn, the global reach of the EU AI Act seems rather limited at best in the long term.
© 2024 by Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG, Gustav-Heinemann-Ufer 58, 50968 Köln.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Title
- Table of Contents
- Articles
- The Canadian AIDA and the EU AI Act: Will Sanity Prevail as they more closely align? – Part 1
- Defining AI Systems in the EU and Beyond
- The EU AI Act: A Practice-Oriented Interpretation
- Case Law
- EU: Prohibition of information society service for online sale of medicinal products
- Updates
- EEA: noyb’s Consent Banner Report
- UK: Digital Markets and Future Developments
- Imprint
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Title
- Table of Contents
- Articles
- The Canadian AIDA and the EU AI Act: Will Sanity Prevail as they more closely align? – Part 1
- Defining AI Systems in the EU and Beyond
- The EU AI Act: A Practice-Oriented Interpretation
- Case Law
- EU: Prohibition of information society service for online sale of medicinal products
- Updates
- EEA: noyb’s Consent Banner Report
- UK: Digital Markets and Future Developments
- Imprint