This publication is presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

Manchester University Press

Home Manchester University Press 4 Where do Polish carpets come from?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

4 Where do Polish carpets come from?

  • Tomasz Grusiecki

Abstract

Chapter 4 examines the group of carpets termed tapis polonais (French for ‘Polish carpets’), which were mistakenly given this name in the nineteenth century despite their Iranian provenience. Today, these artefacts are often described as the ‘so-called Polish carpets’, emphasizing the historical confusion that led to the epithet. Relying on evidence from both early modern and modern archival and literary sources, this chapter argues that to uncover the significance of tapis polonais, however, we must embrace their transcultural contexts. Woven on Iranian looms, the carpets were often commissioned by Poles, Ruthenians, and Lithuanians; until the late nineteenth century, these objects were held in Central and Eastern European collections. Carpets based on similar designs were even produced in Poland-Lithuania, further complicating the discussion of these objects’ cultural status. Tapis polonais effectively challenge outdated assumptions that the origin of an art form must be linked to a single nation or geography. These woven things engender a more horizontal narrative that treats with equal interest the many entangled places where tapis polonais were made, traded, consumed, and reinterpreted. Stressing the recontextualizations and reappropriations of these artistic objects, this chapter accordingly foregrounds the ongoing creation (and re-creation) of cultural forms that cannot be simply assigned to a single cultural region and its historical traditions.

Abstract

Chapter 4 examines the group of carpets termed tapis polonais (French for ‘Polish carpets’), which were mistakenly given this name in the nineteenth century despite their Iranian provenience. Today, these artefacts are often described as the ‘so-called Polish carpets’, emphasizing the historical confusion that led to the epithet. Relying on evidence from both early modern and modern archival and literary sources, this chapter argues that to uncover the significance of tapis polonais, however, we must embrace their transcultural contexts. Woven on Iranian looms, the carpets were often commissioned by Poles, Ruthenians, and Lithuanians; until the late nineteenth century, these objects were held in Central and Eastern European collections. Carpets based on similar designs were even produced in Poland-Lithuania, further complicating the discussion of these objects’ cultural status. Tapis polonais effectively challenge outdated assumptions that the origin of an art form must be linked to a single nation or geography. These woven things engender a more horizontal narrative that treats with equal interest the many entangled places where tapis polonais were made, traded, consumed, and reinterpreted. Stressing the recontextualizations and reappropriations of these artistic objects, this chapter accordingly foregrounds the ongoing creation (and re-creation) of cultural forms that cannot be simply assigned to a single cultural region and its historical traditions.

Downloaded on 13.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7765/9781526164377.00012/html
Scroll to top button