Skip to main content
Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

Policy Press

Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Five Moral regulation: rituals, symbols and the collective conscience

Abstract

This chapter argues that the Third Way’s adoption of self-actualisation and self-responsibility as its model of moral regulation meant that it greatly underestimated the importance of emotional, aesthetic, symbolic, and ritual elements in the creation of the social order, and above all it discounted collective influences on social relations. By buying into the notion that ‘reflexive individualisation’ was a wholly new, post-traditional feature of late modern culture, it mistook a culturally produced dominant myth for a new liberation, in which individuals met as ‘real’, ‘reflexive’, and ‘authentic’.

Abstract

This chapter argues that the Third Way’s adoption of self-actualisation and self-responsibility as its model of moral regulation meant that it greatly underestimated the importance of emotional, aesthetic, symbolic, and ritual elements in the creation of the social order, and above all it discounted collective influences on social relations. By buying into the notion that ‘reflexive individualisation’ was a wholly new, post-traditional feature of late modern culture, it mistook a culturally produced dominant myth for a new liberation, in which individuals met as ‘real’, ‘reflexive’, and ‘authentic’.

Downloaded on 4.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781847426581-007/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button