Skip to main content
Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

Policy Press

Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Six Avoiding institutional care: the changing role of the state, the family and voluntary organisations

  • and

Abstract

The legislative framework for service development for older people laid down by the 1946 National Health Service Act and the 1948 National Assistance Act placed the emphasis on institutional provision. And yet the first section of this chapter underlines how there was agreement by the early 1950s that elderly people should remain in their own homes for as long as possible. Despite this, there was no dramatic shift of resources from hospitals and residential homes to domiciliary services, housing and income maintenance schemes.

This chapter focuses narrowly on arguments about those domiciliary services that were eventually to be located in social services departments. What kind of arguments were made in their favour and how did perceptions vary about their function? What was seen as the role of voluntary organisations in service provision? How did these arguments relate to perceptions about the responsibilities of families to their elderly relatives?

There was a broad consensus throughout the 1950s and 1960s that elderly people should remain in their own homes for as long as possible for their own happiness and also to reduce financial pressure on the state. The first of these arguments was strongly put by Townsend:

Home was the old armchair by the hearth, the creaky bedstead, the polished lino with its faded pattern, the sideboard with its picture gallery, and the lavatory with its broken latch reached through the rain. It embodied a thousand memories and held promise of a thousand contentments. It was an extension of personality. (Townsend, 1963, p 38)

The ‘financial pressure’ case was put forward by Sheldon at the 1954 International Association of Gerontology Conference.

Abstract

The legislative framework for service development for older people laid down by the 1946 National Health Service Act and the 1948 National Assistance Act placed the emphasis on institutional provision. And yet the first section of this chapter underlines how there was agreement by the early 1950s that elderly people should remain in their own homes for as long as possible. Despite this, there was no dramatic shift of resources from hospitals and residential homes to domiciliary services, housing and income maintenance schemes.

This chapter focuses narrowly on arguments about those domiciliary services that were eventually to be located in social services departments. What kind of arguments were made in their favour and how did perceptions vary about their function? What was seen as the role of voluntary organisations in service provision? How did these arguments relate to perceptions about the responsibilities of families to their elderly relatives?

There was a broad consensus throughout the 1950s and 1960s that elderly people should remain in their own homes for as long as possible for their own happiness and also to reduce financial pressure on the state. The first of these arguments was strongly put by Townsend:

Home was the old armchair by the hearth, the creaky bedstead, the polished lino with its faded pattern, the sideboard with its picture gallery, and the lavatory with its broken latch reached through the rain. It embodied a thousand memories and held promise of a thousand contentments. It was an extension of personality. (Townsend, 1963, p 38)

The ‘financial pressure’ case was put forward by Sheldon at the 1954 International Association of Gerontology Conference.

Downloaded on 29.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781847424945-007/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button