Home Four The case of older people: social thought and divergent prescriptions for care
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Four The case of older people: social thought and divergent prescriptions for care

  • John Offer
View more publications by Policy Press

Abstract

This chapter presents a ‘case study’ of theoretically grounded approaches to the care of older people. It starts by reporting the nature of Herbert Spencer’s concern with the treatment of parents late in their lives by their offspring. It also examines the comments on older people of the majority report of 1909, and the minority report: both reports reflect what José Harris calls idealist styles of social thought. The importance of ‘idealist social thought’ and the ‘power’ of this concept, and the implied contrasting concept of ‘non-idealist social thought’ are explained. It then briefly emphasizes some recent developments in policy and research. It appears that the idea of ‘idealist social thought’ and the further distinction between idealist and non-idealist modes of thinking have a real potential to enhance the interpretation of the significant normative differences over the role of filial beneficence, domiciliary support from other sources and institution.

Abstract

This chapter presents a ‘case study’ of theoretically grounded approaches to the care of older people. It starts by reporting the nature of Herbert Spencer’s concern with the treatment of parents late in their lives by their offspring. It also examines the comments on older people of the majority report of 1909, and the minority report: both reports reflect what José Harris calls idealist styles of social thought. The importance of ‘idealist social thought’ and the ‘power’ of this concept, and the implied contrasting concept of ‘non-idealist social thought’ are explained. It then briefly emphasizes some recent developments in policy and research. It appears that the idea of ‘idealist social thought’ and the further distinction between idealist and non-idealist modes of thinking have a real potential to enhance the interpretation of the significant normative differences over the role of filial beneficence, domiciliary support from other sources and institution.

Downloaded on 3.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781847421487-007/html
Scroll to top button