Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

Policy Press

Home Policy Press 2 Evaluation in the Middle East and North Africa region: progress, persisting challenges, and pathways forward
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

2 Evaluation in the Middle East and North Africa region: progress, persisting challenges, and pathways forward

Abstract

This chapter critically examines evaluation procedures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, highlighting successes, challenges, and future directions. MENA nations – Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen – remain committed to the Paris Declaration’s aid effectiveness for results, and mutual accountability. This dedication has boosted regional interest in evaluation procedures. The chapter also analyses the progress that has been made in the evaluation of institutionalisation in the MENA region. National evaluation societies in MENA nations have encouraged evaluation and created communities of practice of evaluation experts. However, the ongoing difficulties in the MENA region must be acknowledged. These challenges include authoritarian rule, a lack of transparency, and restrictions on civil liberties, which hinder policy making informed by the findings of evaluation. These issues are further complicated by poor stakeholder communication and a lack of collaboration. The chapter consequently emphasises the need for major cultural shifts, greater transparency, and more appreciation for feedback and data-driven decision making as part of its broader discussion of strategies to increase the use of evaluation processes in the MENA region.

Abstract

This chapter critically examines evaluation procedures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, highlighting successes, challenges, and future directions. MENA nations – Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen – remain committed to the Paris Declaration’s aid effectiveness for results, and mutual accountability. This dedication has boosted regional interest in evaluation procedures. The chapter also analyses the progress that has been made in the evaluation of institutionalisation in the MENA region. National evaluation societies in MENA nations have encouraged evaluation and created communities of practice of evaluation experts. However, the ongoing difficulties in the MENA region must be acknowledged. These challenges include authoritarian rule, a lack of transparency, and restrictions on civil liberties, which hinder policy making informed by the findings of evaluation. These issues are further complicated by poor stakeholder communication and a lack of collaboration. The chapter consequently emphasises the need for major cultural shifts, greater transparency, and more appreciation for feedback and data-driven decision making as part of its broader discussion of strategies to increase the use of evaluation processes in the MENA region.

Downloaded on 26.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447375708-004/html
Scroll to top button