Home Four The necessities of life
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Four The necessities of life

  • Christina Pantazis , David Gordon and Peter Townsend
View more publications by Policy Press
Poverty and social exclusion in Britain
This chapter is in the book Poverty and social exclusion in Britain

Abstract

One of the primary purposes of the Poverty and Social Exclusion(PSE) Survey was to establish what possessions and activities the public perceive as necessary – that no adult in modern society should have to go without due to a lack of money. This type of social inquiry reflects a long tradition within poverty research of attempting to establish what constitutes human needs. For example, Charles Booth (1902, p 33) argued that the “‘poor’ may be described as living under a struggle to obtain the necessities of life and make both ends meet”. The 1983 Living in Britain Survey (published as Poor Britain (Mack and Lansky, 1985)), which set the precedent for the PSE Survey, was the first in Britain to capture what ‘standard of living’ is considered unacceptable by society as a whole. In a radical departure from previous poverty studies, which relied on the role of ‘experts’, the central idea of the Living in Britain Survey was:

to try to discover whether there is a public consensus on what is an unacceptable standard of living for Britain in 1983 and, if there is a consensus, who, if anyone, falls below that standard. The idea underlying this is that a person is in ‘poverty’ when their standard of living falls below the minimum deemed necessary by current public opinion. (Mack and Lansley, 1985, p 50, emphasis added)

One of the major achievements of the Mack and Lansley study was that it established that this minimum covered not only the basic essentials for survival (such as food and shelter) but also the ability to participate in society and play a social role:

for the first time ever, … that a majority of people see the necessities of life in Britain in the 1980s as covering a wide range of goods and activities, and … that people judge a minimum standard of living on socially established criteria and not just the criteria of survival or subsistence.

Abstract

One of the primary purposes of the Poverty and Social Exclusion(PSE) Survey was to establish what possessions and activities the public perceive as necessary – that no adult in modern society should have to go without due to a lack of money. This type of social inquiry reflects a long tradition within poverty research of attempting to establish what constitutes human needs. For example, Charles Booth (1902, p 33) argued that the “‘poor’ may be described as living under a struggle to obtain the necessities of life and make both ends meet”. The 1983 Living in Britain Survey (published as Poor Britain (Mack and Lansky, 1985)), which set the precedent for the PSE Survey, was the first in Britain to capture what ‘standard of living’ is considered unacceptable by society as a whole. In a radical departure from previous poverty studies, which relied on the role of ‘experts’, the central idea of the Living in Britain Survey was:

to try to discover whether there is a public consensus on what is an unacceptable standard of living for Britain in 1983 and, if there is a consensus, who, if anyone, falls below that standard. The idea underlying this is that a person is in ‘poverty’ when their standard of living falls below the minimum deemed necessary by current public opinion. (Mack and Lansley, 1985, p 50, emphasis added)

One of the major achievements of the Mack and Lansley study was that it established that this minimum covered not only the basic essentials for survival (such as food and shelter) but also the ability to participate in society and play a social role:

for the first time ever, … that a majority of people see the necessities of life in Britain in the 1980s as covering a wide range of goods and activities, and … that people judge a minimum standard of living on socially established criteria and not just the criteria of survival or subsistence.

Downloaded on 30.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447366843-009/html
Scroll to top button