Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

Policy Press

Home Policy Press 10 Austerity-induced populism: the rise and transformation of the new right
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

10 Austerity-induced populism: the rise and transformation of the new right

Abstract

Public and academic discussions in the European Union often relate to two processes, the interaction of which requires some clarification. One is the rise and mode of operation of neoliberalism, particularly, the establishment and implementation of an austerity agenda, that is, efforts to consolidate public budgets through spending cuts (Hermann 2007). This process started in the late 1970s and became more pervasive in most member states since then. Consequently, the austerity policy guidelines were enshrined as an important component of the European treaties. Furthermore, they were made even stricter in the transition from the financial to the so-called sovereign debt crisis. The second process is the strengthening of right-wing populism in the member states of the European Union (Kriesi 2014). This process also began in the 1970s with the foundation of Progress Parties in Scandinavia, the Vlaams Belang in Belgium, the Swiss People’s Party and the Front National (FN) in France, all, more or less, with an ethno-nationalist orientation and a critical attitude to the comprehensive, centralized welfare state. This policy stance, extended by a critique of European integration, was also adopted by a second group of parties founded since the late 1980s: the Lega Nord in Italy, the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in Britain, the Sweden Democrats, the True Fins, or the newly oriented Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) in Austria. Finally, the 2000s saw a third foundation wave – the Partij voor de Vrijheid (PVV) in the Netherlands, the Polish Party Prawo I Sprawiedliwosc (PiS), or Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in Germany – all further hostile to immigration and Islam, but less determined in terms of economic and welfare policies.

Abstract

Public and academic discussions in the European Union often relate to two processes, the interaction of which requires some clarification. One is the rise and mode of operation of neoliberalism, particularly, the establishment and implementation of an austerity agenda, that is, efforts to consolidate public budgets through spending cuts (Hermann 2007). This process started in the late 1970s and became more pervasive in most member states since then. Consequently, the austerity policy guidelines were enshrined as an important component of the European treaties. Furthermore, they were made even stricter in the transition from the financial to the so-called sovereign debt crisis. The second process is the strengthening of right-wing populism in the member states of the European Union (Kriesi 2014). This process also began in the 1970s with the foundation of Progress Parties in Scandinavia, the Vlaams Belang in Belgium, the Swiss People’s Party and the Front National (FN) in France, all, more or less, with an ethno-nationalist orientation and a critical attitude to the comprehensive, centralized welfare state. This policy stance, extended by a critique of European integration, was also adopted by a second group of parties founded since the late 1980s: the Lega Nord in Italy, the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in Britain, the Sweden Democrats, the True Fins, or the newly oriented Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) in Austria. Finally, the 2000s saw a third foundation wave – the Partij voor de Vrijheid (PVV) in the Netherlands, the Polish Party Prawo I Sprawiedliwosc (PiS), or Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in Germany – all further hostile to immigration and Islam, but less determined in terms of economic and welfare policies.

Chapters in this book

  1. Front Matter i
  2. Contents iii
  3. List of figures and tables v
  4. Notes on contributors vii
  5. Acknowledgements xiii
  6. Introduction 1
  7. Austerity and the promotion of the private
  8. Beyond austerity: pro-public strategies versus public-private partnership scandals 25
  9. Institutionalizing austerity accounting in Europe: the implementation of European Public Sector Accounting Standards as crisis response 42
  10. Coping and casualties: labour and the social
  11. A fragile triangle: collective bargaining systems, trade unions and the state in the EU 63
  12. Privatizing the sacrifice: individualized funding, austerity and precarity in the voluntary sector in Australia and Scotland 82
  13. Austerity and the social innovation agenda 103
  14. Beyond coping: protest, pathologies and the development of real alternatives
  15. Politics as an alternative to constitutionalization 127
  16. There could be alternatives! German economic advisory councils and the institutional reproduction of austerity economics 147
  17. Negotiated austerity? A comparative survey of social concertation in Canada, Denmark, Ireland and Spain 176
  18. Market populism, its right-wing offspring and left alternatives 195
  19. Austerity-induced populism: the rise and transformation of the new right 213
  20. Reducing the burden: international struggles against illegitimate debt 230
  21. The crisis next time: the GFC and the continuing fragility of capitalism 248
  22. Austerity after COVID-19: from emergency pragmatism to inclusive economic governance in Europe 272
  23. Conclusion 292
  24. Index 301
Downloaded on 28.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447359531-014/html
Scroll to top button