Home Physical Sciences Detachment of the Polymer Melt from the Roll Surface: Calendering Analysis and Data from a Shear Roll Extruder
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Detachment of the Polymer Melt from the Roll Surface: Calendering Analysis and Data from a Shear Roll Extruder

  • , and
Published/Copyright: May 2, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The detachment behavior of a polymer melt from the hot roll surface/s during roll-driven processes affects the maximum production rates achievable in various processes including calendering, embossing and shear roll milling. Here the continuous shear roll milling process is used to investigate the conditions that lead to the detachment of the polymer melt from the surface of one or both heated rolls. During the shear roll milling process the polymer melt needs to continuously stick to one roll and periodically to stick and then to detach from the other roll (at the nip). Different roll speeds, surface roughness and temperatures are used to facilitate continuous stick to one roll and periodic stick and detachment from the other roll. Shear roll mill process fails to convey the melt in the forward direction under conditions for which the melt detaches from both rolls. The shear roll mill processing of a high density polyethylene revealed the detachment of the melt from both rolls under various combinations of operating parameters. A calendering model enabling the use of different roll diameters and roll velocities for incompressible generalized Newtonian fluids under isothermal and lubrication flow conditions was developed and used to understand the detachment dynamics. The detachment of the melt from both rolls was revealed to occur when the maximum shear stress at the roll surface exceeds the critical wall shear stress at which the onset of macroscopic wall slip is observed in simple shear flow. These findings suggest that the processing window for roll-driven processes is affected by the wall slip characteristics of the polymer melt and that the processing window can be widened using a better understanding of the wall slip behavior of the materials being processed.


Mail address: D. M. Kalyon, Chemical, Biomedical and Materials Eng. Dept., Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point Station, Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA E-mail:

References

1 Menges, G., Krueger, E.: Kunststoffe75, p. 258 (1985).Search in Google Scholar

2 Berghaus, U., Bartilla, T., Heidemeyer, P., Crolla, G.: Plastverarbeiter39, p. 70 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

3 Albers, A.: Kunststoffe82, p. 982 (1992).Search in Google Scholar

4 Albers, A.: Galventechnik85, p. 1971 (1994).Search in Google Scholar

5 Gevgilili, H., Kalyon, D. M.: Journal of Rheology45, p. 467 (2001).10.1122/1.1339248Search in Google Scholar

6 Kalyon, D. M., Gevgilili, H.: Journal of Rheology47 p. 683 (2003).10.1122/1.1562156Search in Google Scholar

7 Kiparissides, C., Vlachopoulos, J.: Polym. Eng. Sci.16, p. 712 (1976).10.1002/pen.760161010Search in Google Scholar

8 Kiparissides, C., Vlachopoulos, J.: Polym. Eng. Sci.18, p. 210 (1978).10.1002/pen.760180307Search in Google Scholar

9 Levine, L., Corvalan, C. M., Campanella, O. H., Okos, M. R.: Chem. Eng. Sci.57, p. 643 (2002).10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00410-9Search in Google Scholar

10 Klostermann, R., Von Bose, S., Mewes, D.: Advances in Polymer Technology13, p. 187 (1994).10.1002/adv.1994.060130301Search in Google Scholar

11 Agassant, J. F., Espy, M.: Polym. Eng. Sci.25, p. 118 (1985).10.1002/pen.760250210Search in Google Scholar

12 Ng, T. S., Angerer, G.: Polym. Eng. Sci.20, p. 585 (1980).10.1002/pen.760200812Search in Google Scholar

13 Yao, C. H, Manas-Zloczower, I.: Polym. Eng. Sci.36, p. 305 (1996).10.1002/pen.10417Search in Google Scholar

14 McKelvey, J.: Polymer Processing. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1962).Search in Google Scholar

15 MiddlemanS.: Fundamentals of Polymer Processing. McGraw Hill, New York (1977).Search in Google Scholar

16 Tadmor, Z., Gogos, C.: Principles of Polymer Processing. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1979).Search in Google Scholar

17 Gaskell, R.: J. Appl. Mech.17, p. 334 (1950).10.1115/1.4010136Search in Google Scholar

18 Allston, W., Astill, K.: J. Appl. Polym. Sci.17 p. 3157 (1973).10.1002/app.1973.070171018Search in Google Scholar

19 Brazinsky, I., Cosway, H. F., Valle, C. F., Jones, R. C.: J. Appl. Polym. Sci.14, p. 2771 (1970).10.1002/app.1970.070141111Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2003-9-18
Accepted: 2004-2-10
Published Online: 2013-05-02
Published in Print: 2004-05-01

© 2004, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

Downloaded on 2.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.1822/html
Scroll to top button