Home Analysis of the Residual Stresses in the Process of Nanoimprint Lithography
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analysis of the Residual Stresses in the Process of Nanoimprint Lithography

  • W.-B. Young
Published/Copyright: March 26, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Nanoimprint lithography has attracted broad interest as a low cost method to define nanometer scale patterns in recent years. In the cooling stage of the nanoimprint lithography process, the polymer resist is constrained inside the tool. As the temperature decreases, the polymer may shrink away from the tool. However, due to the constraint of the tool, thermal stresses may be induced in the polymer while the relaxation effect tends to release the build up of the stress level at the same time. In this study, a visco-elastic model was developed to analyze the stress variations of the imprinted patterns during the cooling process. Most of the residual stress is found to concentrate on the interface between the polymer resist and the substrate. Also, some stress concentration areas are observed near the adjacent of the large un-patterned area and the pillar. Thermal stress above the glass transition point is demonstrated to be able to relax during the cooling process. Most of the residual stresses are induced at the cooling stage with a temperature lower than the glass transition point.


Mail address: W.-B. Young, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C. E-mail:

References

1 1 Chou, S. Y., Krauss, P. R., Renstrom, J. P.: Science272, p. 85 (1996)10.1126/science.272.5258.85Search in Google Scholar

2 2 Schift, H., Jaszewski, R. W., David, C., Gobrecht, J.: Microelectron. Eng. 46, p. 121 (1999)10.1016/S0167-9317(99)00030-1Search in Google Scholar

3 3 Scheer, H. C., Schulz, H., Hoffmann, T., Sotomayer, C. M.: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B16, p. 3917 (1998)10.1116/1.590436Search in Google Scholar

4 4 Khang, D. Y., Lee, H. H.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, p. 2599 (1999)10.1063/1.125090Search in Google Scholar

5 5 Heidari, B., Maximov, I., Sarwe, E. L., Montelius, L.: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B17, p. 2961 (1999)10.1116/1.590934Search in Google Scholar

6 6 Heyderman, L. J., Schift, H., David, C., Gobrecht, I., Schweizer, T.: Microelectron. Eng. 54, p. 229 (2000)10.1016/S0167-9317(00)00414-7Search in Google Scholar

7 7 Scheer, H.-C., Schulz, H.: Microelectron. Eng. 56, p. 311 (2001)10.1016/S0167-9317(01)00569-XSearch in Google Scholar

8 8 Juang, Y. J., Lee, L. J., Koelling, K. W.: Polym. Eng. Sci. 42, p. 539 (2002)10.1002/pen.10970Search in Google Scholar

9 9 Schulz, H., Wissen, M., Scheer, H.-C.: Microelectron. Eng. 67–68, p. 657 (2003)10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00128-XSearch in Google Scholar

10 10 Juang, Y. J., Lee, L. J., Koelling, K. W.: Polym. Eng. Sci. 42, p. 551 (2002)10.1002/pen.10971Search in Google Scholar

11 11 Hirai, Y., Fujiwara, M., Okuno, T., Tanaka, Y.: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B19 (6), p. 811 (2001)10.1116/1.1415510Search in Google Scholar

12 12 Hirai, Y., Yoshida, S., Takagi, N.: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B21 (6), p. 2765 (2003)10.1116/1.1629289Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2005-08-01
Accepted: 2006-01-06
Published Online: 2013-03-26
Published in Print: 2006-07-01

© 2006, Hanser Publishers, Munich

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.0100/html
Scroll to top button