Startseite Assessment on the contact factors of a sandwich soft finger model – An experimental investigation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Assessment on the contact factors of a sandwich soft finger model – An experimental investigation

  • K. Venkatesh Raja und R. Malayalamurthi
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. Mai 2015
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The bio-mechanics of skin and bone play a crucial role in dexterous object manipulations and artificial robotic gripper design. Establishing a quantitative relationship between imposed loads and contact factors is necessary to understand the governing mechanics behind it. Towards this goal, experimental investigations on the contact parameters of a sandwich soft fingertip comprising a soft layer and solid core are presented. The influence of soft layer stratum and material grades on the power law equation is investigated by introducing a new dimensionless parameter – Power Factor. The results clearly indicate that the power index “γ” is dependent on the material as well as shell thickness and in addition the proportionality constant “C” is dependent on the geometry. Also, the magnitude of both the constants increases with power factor and saturates at a value of ≈1.25. Numerical simulation is performed to support the experimental results. Finally, an optimum ratio of power factor is determined and the number ≈1.25 is critical in designing the artificial robotic sandwich fingertip.


* Correspondence address, Mr. K. Venkatesh Raja, Assistant Professor (Sr.), Department of Automobile Engineering, K.S.R. College of Engineering, Tiruchengode – 637215, Namakkal (Dt.), Tamil Nadu, India, Tel.: +91 4288 272741, Fax: +91 4288 272741, E-mail:

References

[1] M.T.Mason, J.K.SalisburyJr.: Robot hands and the mechanics of manipulation, MIT press (1985).Suche in Google Scholar

[2] H.Hertz: Miscellaneous Papers, MacMillan, New York, (1886) 163. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924012500306.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] L.A.Galin: Contact Problems of Elasticity Theory, Gostekhizdat, Moscow (1953).Suche in Google Scholar

[4] A.Schallamach: Proc. Phys. Soc.B65 (1952) 657. 10.1088/0370-1301/65/9/301Suche in Google Scholar

[5] M.R.Cutkosky, J.Jourdain, P.Wright: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (1987) 1649. 10.1109/ROBOT.1987.1087913)Suche in Google Scholar

[6] S.Goyal, A.Ruina, J.Papadopoulos: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (1989) 794. 10.1109/ROBOT.1989.100081Suche in Google Scholar

[7] S.Goyal, A.Ruina, J.Papadopoulos: Wear143 (1991) 307. 10.1016/0043-1648(91)90104-3Suche in Google Scholar

[8] S.Goyal, A.Ruina, J.Papadopoulos: Wear143 (1991) 331. 10.1016/0043-1648(91)90105-4)Suche in Google Scholar

[9] B.Shimoga, A.A.Goldenberg: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (1992).Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Y.Tatara: J. Eng. Mater. Technol.111 (1989) 163. 10.1115/1.3226449Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Y.Tatara: J. Eng. Mater. Technol.113 (1991) 285. 10.1115/1.2903407Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Y.Tatara, S.Shima, J.C.Lucero: J. Eng. Mater. Technol.113 (1991) 292. 10.1115/1.2903408Suche in Google Scholar

[13] H.Y.Han, A.Shimada, S.Kawamura: Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Robotics and Automation (1996) 3061. 10.1109/ROBOT.1996.509177Suche in Google Scholar

[14] H.Kinoshita, L.Bäckström, J.R.Flanagan, R.S.Johansson: J. Neurophys.78.3 (1997) 1619.10.1152/jn.1997.78.3.1619Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] N.Xydas, I.Kao: Proc IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (1998) 488. 10.1109/IROS. 1998.724666Suche in Google Scholar

[16] N.Xydas, I.Kao: Int. J. Rob. Res.18 (1999) 941. 10.1177/02783649922066673Suche in Google Scholar

[17] N.Xydas, M.Bhagavat, I.Kao: Proc. ICRA’00. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (2000) 2179. 10.1109/ROBOT.2000.846351Suche in Google Scholar

[18] F.M.Hendriks, D.Brokken, J.Van Eemeren, C.W.J.Oomens, F.P.T.Baaijens, J.Horsten: Skin Res. Technol.9 (2003) 274. 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2003.00019.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] F.M.Hendriks, D.Brokken, J.Van Eemeren, C.W.J.Oomens, F.P.T.Baaijens: Skin Res. Technol.10 (2004) 231. 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00077.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Y.Li, I.Kao: Proc. ICRA. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation (2001) 3055. 10.1109/ROBOT.2001.933086Suche in Google Scholar

[21] K.H.Park, B.H.Kim, S.Hirai: Proc. ICRA’03. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (2003) 3169. 10.1109/ROBOT.2003.1242078Suche in Google Scholar

[22] I.Kao, F.Yang: IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation20 (2004) 132. 10.1109/TRA.2003.820868Suche in Google Scholar

[23] P.Tiezzi, G.Vassura: ICAR’05. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics (2005) 109. 10.1109/ICAR.2005.1507399Suche in Google Scholar

[24] K.Venkatesh Raja, R.Malayalamurthi: J. Polym. Eng.34 (2014) 145. 10.1515/polyeng-2013-0121Suche in Google Scholar

[25] ANSYS 11.0 Documentation, ANSYS Inc. (2008).Suche in Google Scholar

[26] R.W.Ogden: Rubber Chem. Technol.59 (1986) 361. 10.5254/1.3538206Suche in Google Scholar

[27] R.W.Ogden, Non-linear elastic deformations, Courier Dover Publications (1997).Suche in Google Scholar

[28] R.W.Ogden: Non-linear elastic deformations, Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1984).Suche in Google Scholar

[29] K.Venkatesh Raja, R.Malayalamurthi: Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des.7 (2011) 299. 10.1007/s10999-011-9167-1Suche in Google Scholar

[30] G.Strang: Introduction to linear algebra, Cambridge Publication (2003).10.1007/978-3-642-55631-9Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-09-03
Accepted: 2014-12-17
Published Online: 2015-05-12
Published in Print: 2015-05-13

© 2015, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/146.111206/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen