Home Statistical Large-Break LOCA analysis for PWRs with combined ECC injection
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Statistical Large-Break LOCA analysis for PWRs with combined ECC injection

  • G.-J. Seeberger , E.-M. Pauli , R. Trewin and L.-P. Zeisler
Published/Copyright: April 15, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A statistical analysis methodology based on the code scaling, applicability and uncertainty (CSAU) evaluation approach for predicting the safety margin in case of a postulated large-break loss-of-coolant accident (LBLOCA) in a pressurized-water reactor (PWR) was developed by AREVA. All expected LBLOCA phenomena are listed in the Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) and are prioritized according to their importance on the figure of merit, here the fuel rod peak cladding temperature (PCT). For the high-ranked phenomena parameters are identified, which allow a quantification of the analysis uncertainty. AREVA has updated the PIRT to the state of the art and extended it to the application to pressurized-water reactors with combined emergency core cooling injection of German-type PWRs. This paper describes how the uncertainty distributions, required for a statistical analysis, have been derived and presents the result of an exemplary statistical analysis for a German-type 4-loop plant compared to that of a conservative deterministic analysis.

Kurzfassung

Von AREVA wurde eine statistische Analysemethode auf Basis der Code Scaling, Applicability and Uncertainty (CSAU) Methode zur Bewertung der Auswirkungen eines postulierten großen Lecks im Primärsystem eines Druckwasserreaktors auf die Anlagensicherheit entwickelt. Alle im Störfall erwarteten Phänomene werden in einer Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) aufgeführt und entsprechend ihres Einflusses auf das Nachweisziel (maximale Brennstabhüllrohrtemperatur) eingestuft. Den wichtigen Phänomenen werden Parameter zugeordnet, die es erlauben, die Analyseunsicherheit zu quantifizieren. Die PIRT wurde von AREVA an den Stand von Wissenschaft und Technik angepasst und auf Anlagen mit kombinierter Notkühleinspeisung erweitert. Dieses Papier erläutert die Ermittlung der für die statistische Analyse benötigten Verteilungsfunktionen und zeigt das Ergebnis einer beispielhaften Analyse für eine deutsche 4-loop-Anlage im Vergleich mit dem Ergebnis einer konservativen deterministischen Analyse.

References

1 Martin, R. P.; O’Dell, L. D.: AREVA's realistic large break LOCA analysis methodology. Nuclear Engineering and Design235 (2005) 1713172510.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.02.004Search in Google Scholar

2 Seeberger, G.-J.; Trewin, R.; Zeisler, L.-P.: From phenomena to acceptance criteria. A statistical LBLOCA analysis, Proceedings of Annual Meeting on Nuclear Technology, Berlin, May 17–19, 2011Search in Google Scholar

3 Katsma, D. K. R.; Hall, G.; Shaw, R. A.; Fletcher, C. D.; Boodry, K. S.: Quantifying Reactor Safety Margins. NUREG/CR-5249, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1989).Search in Google Scholar

4 Carlson, K. E.; Riemke, R. A.; Roulhani, S. Z.; Shumway, R. W.; Weaver, W. L.: RELAP5/MOD3 Code Manual. NUREG/CR-5535, EGG-2596, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1990)Search in Google Scholar

5 Weiss, P.; Emmerling, R.; Hertlein, R.; Liebert, J.: UPTF Experiment: Two-Phase Flow Experiments in Full-Scale to Extend Knowledge of PWR LOCA Thermal-Hydraulics. 1992 National Heat Transfer Conference, San Diego, California, August 9–12, 1992Search in Google Scholar

6 Kozmenkov, Y.; Rohde, U.: Application of the Method for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation to Results of PWR LBLOCA Analysis Calculated with the Code Athlet. Part 1: Uncertainty Analysis. Kerntechnik78 (2013) 35436110.3139/124.110379Search in Google Scholar

7 Kozmenkov, Y.; Rohde, U.: Application of the Method for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation to Results of PWR LBLOCA Analysis Calculated with the Code Athlet. Part 2: sensitivity Analysis, Kerntechnik79 (2014) (bitte anpassen) – dies ist für den Verlag10.3139/124.110385Search in Google Scholar

8 StudsvikA. B. Energiteknik: The Marviken Full Scale Critical Flow Tests. NUREG/CR-2671, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1982)Search in Google Scholar

9 Loftus, M. J.; Tong, A.; Hochreiter, L. E.; Rosal, E. R.; Conway, C. E.; Valkovic, M. M.; Dodge, C. E.; Wong, W.: PWR FLECHT SEASET Unblocked Bundle; Forced And Gravity Reflood Task Data Report. Volume 1 and Volume 2, NUREG/CR-1532 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1980)Search in Google Scholar

10 Sleicher, C. A.; Rouse, M. W.: A Convenient Correlation for Heat Transfer to Constant and Variable Property Fluids in Turbulent Pipe Flow. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer18 (1975) 67768310.1016/0017-9310(75)90279-3Search in Google Scholar

11 Bromley, L. A.: Heat Transfer in Stable Film Boiling. Chemical Engineering Progress Volume46 (1950) 221227Search in Google Scholar

12 Forslund, R. P.; Rohsenow, W. M.: Dispersed Flow Film Boiling. Journal of Heat Transfer90 (1968) 39940710.1115/1.3597531Search in Google Scholar

13 Trewin, R. R.; Seeberger, G.-J.: Key Parameters and Their Probability-Distribution Functions For Statistical Large-Break LOCA Analyses. Proceedings of Annual Meeting on Nuclear Technology, Hamburg, May 27–29, 2008Search in Google Scholar

14 Weibull, W.: A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, (1951) 233234Search in Google Scholar

15 Heins, L.: Fuel Rod Design by Statistical Methods for Increased Demands, TOPFUEL ’99, 13–15 September 1999, Avignon (France)Search in Google Scholar

16 Wensauer, A.; DistlerI.; HeinsL.: Probabilistic Uncertainty Analysis Applied to Fuel Rod Design, Proceedings of PSAM7-ESREL, 14–18 June 2004, Berlin (Germany)10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_447Search in Google Scholar

17 Wilks, S. S.: Determination of Sample Sizes for Setting Tolerance Limits. Ann. Math. Stat. 12 (1941) 919610.1214/aoms/1177731788Search in Google Scholar

18 Kloos, M.; Hofer, E.: SUSA Version 3.5. The PC Version of the Software System for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Results from Computer Models. User's Guide and Tutorial, GRS, February 2002Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-08-01
Published Online: 2014-04-15
Published in Print: 2014-04-28

© 2014, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/124.110393/html
Scroll to top button