Evaluation of radioactive emissions of lignite-fired power plants in Turkey using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

References

1 Clean coal technologies. World Energy Council, Turkish National Committee Working Group, Ankara. 2010, (in Turkish)Search in Google Scholar

2 Annual report: 2012. Electricity Generation Company of Turkey, Ankara, 2012, (in Turkish)Search in Google Scholar

3 Martin, J. E., Lee, C.: Principles of radiological health and safety. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience; 2003Search in Google Scholar

4 Eckerman, K. F., Leggett, R. W., Nelson, C. B., Jeroma, J. S. Puskin, Richardson, A. C. B.: Cancer risk coefficients for environmental exposure to radionuclides. Federal Guidance Report No. 13 EPA 402-R-99-001, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee: Oak Ridge, 1999Search in Google Scholar

5 Natural radioactivity measurements in ash-samples of the yatağan power plant. Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, Ankara, 1994, (in Turkish)Search in Google Scholar

6 Akyüz, T., Varinlioğlu, A., Köse, A., Derman, D.: Gamma isotopic analysis in flying ash samples collected from several thermal power plants. Proceedings of VII. National Nuclear Sciences and Technology Conference, Istanbul, September 3–6, 1996. p. 239, (in Turkish)Search in Google Scholar

7 Akyüz, T., Varinlioglu, A., Kose, A.: Gamma isotopic analysis of the coals and ashes from coal fıred power plants of Turkey. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics49 (1999) 435Search in Google Scholar

8 Çam, F., Yaprak, G., Candan, O., Bayram, A., Onat, B., Tanıl, H., Mert, A.: Natural radioisotopes (²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th, ⁴⁰K and ²¹⁰Pb) determination around the coal-fired power plants in the southwestern part of turkey due to radioactivity emissions from the power plants and radiological ve risk assessment. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey Project, Project No: 103Y57, Ankara, 2006, (in Turkish)Search in Google Scholar

9 Natural radioactivity measurements in ash-samples from the coal-fired power plants in turkey and radiological risk assessment of ash samples which are used in Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, Technical Report. No: TAEA TR 2009-11. Ankara, 2009, (in Turkish)Search in Google Scholar

10 Ayçık, G. A., Ercan, A.: Off-line determination of ash content directly in coal samples via-spectrometry. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews33 (1998) 237Search in Google Scholar

11 Cevik, U., Damla, N., Nezir, S.: Radiological characterization of Cayırhan coal-fired power plant in Turkey. Fuel86 (2007) 2509Search in Google Scholar

12 Öztürk, N., Özdoğan, Z. S.: Preliminary analyses of natural radionuclides in selected Turkish power plant lignites. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry259 (2004) 233Search in Google Scholar

13 Saaty, T. L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 198010.21236/ADA214804Search in Google Scholar

14 Saaty, T. L.: Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh: RWS; 1990Search in Google Scholar

15 Solnes, J.: Environmental quality indexing of large industrial development alternatives using AHP. Environmental Impact Assessment Review23 (2003) 283Search in Google Scholar

16 Chatzimouratidis, A. I., PilavachiP.A.: Objective and subjective evaluation of power plants and their non-radioactive emissions using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy35 (2007) 4027Search in Google Scholar

17 Chatzimouratidis, A. I., Pilavachi, P. A.: Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy36 (2008) 1074Search in Google Scholar

18 AmiriM.P.: Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications37 (2010) 621810.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103Search in Google Scholar