Home Technology Modeling of DECL accident in the reactor containment by the CONTAIN 2.0 code
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Modeling of DECL accident in the reactor containment by the CONTAIN 2.0 code

  • M. Abbasi and M. Rahgoshay
Published/Copyright: November 23, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, a specific type of the Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA), the DECL (Double Ended Cold Leg) break, that means totally guillotine type of break in the cold leg pipe, has been modeled. The accident is simulated with the CONTAIN 2.0 code. In the event of a LOCA accident, coolant mass and energy are released to the containment through the break. This causes an increase of pressure and temperature in the containment. The modeling is performed in the VVER-1000 reactor containment. The analysis includes average pressure in the containment and temperature distribution in sample cells in the long-time. The results are compared with the existing reports on studies that used the ANGAR code. Results show that the CONTAIN 2.0 code is an adaptable tool for the analysis of nuclear events such as DECL accident.

References

1 Tiselj, I.; Kljenak, I.; Prosek, A.: simulation of containment response during a Large- Break Loss-of-Coolant accident scenario with the CONTAIN computer code, 4th meeting Nuclear Energy in Central Europe, 613620, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

2 Kljenak, I.; Parzer, I.; Tiselj, I.: containment phenomena during a severe accident with reactor vessel failure at low pressure in a tow-loop pressurized water reactor, Nuclear Energy in Central Europe, 287–294, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

3 Murata, K. K.; Williams, D. C.; Tills, J.; Griffith, R. O.; Gido, R. G.; Tadios, E. L.; Davis, F. J.; Martinze, G. M.; Washington, K. E.: code manual for CONTAIN 2.0: a computer code for nuclear reactor containment analysis, NUREG/CR-653, SAND97-1735, Sandia National Laboratories, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

4 Bergeron, K. D.; Williams, D. C.: CONTAIN calculations of containment loading of DRY PWRs, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 90, 153–159, 1985.10.1016/0029-5493(85)90005-6Search in Google Scholar

5 Williams, D. C.; Griffith, R. O.; Tadios, E. L.; Washington, K. E.: Assessment of the CONTAIN Direct Containment Heating (DCH) Model: Analysis of DCH Integral Experiments, SAND94-1174, Sandia National Laboratories, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

6 Notafrancesco, A.; Esmaili, H.; Lee, B.; Tills, J.: Application of the MELCOR code to design basis BWR containment analysis, RES/FSTB 2011-01, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

7 Kljenak, I.; Mavko, B.: Simulation of containment thermal-hydraulics in the Marviken blowdown 16 experiment with ASTEC and CONTAIN codes, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2010.10.1115/ICONE17-75097Search in Google Scholar

8 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Engineering Safety Features, chapter 6, (2005) 6.2.1.9–35Search in Google Scholar

9 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Accident Analysis, chapter 15, (2005) 15.2.3.4.2.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-5-27
Published Online: 2013-11-23
Published in Print: 2013-11-14

© 2013, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 11.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/124.110341/html
Scroll to top button