Startseite Are Oxygen Demands Relevant for Today's Environmental Assessment of Detergents?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Are Oxygen Demands Relevant for Today's Environmental Assessment of Detergents?

  • G. Boeije und H. J. Klein
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Mai 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Though oxygen demands are critical measurements for waste water treatment plant operation and water quality management, they are of little relevance to assess or rank the environmental quality of detergents. It is argued that: (1) No accurate measurements of the oxygen demand of bleach detergents can be made, because these products release oxygen during the measurement. (2) When waste water is adequately treated, under normal operating conditions the oxygen demand (organic loading) of the raw sewage has no influence on river quality. (3) Oxygen demand values are narrowly focused on environmental exposure, while they do not take into account the potential for ecotoxicological effects. (4) Short-term biological oxygen demand measurements are useful for the monitoring of ‘average sewage', but they are unreliable to assess the biodegradability of more specific substances or products. Instead of oxygen demands, more holistic evaluations based on risk assessment or on life cycle analysis are scientifically preferred.

Kurzfassung

Obwohl Messungen des Sauerstoffbedarfs für Abwasserreinigungsanlagen und des Wasserqualitätsmanagement von entscheidender Wichtigkeit sind, haben sie für die Berurteilung und Einordnung der Umweltverträglichkeit von Waschmitteln nur geringe Bedeutung. Man ist der Auffassung, dass (1) keine exakten Messungen des Sauerstoffsbedarfs von Vollwaschmitteln durchgeführt werden können, da diese Produkte während der Messung Sauerstoff freisetzen. (2) Wenn das Abwasser unter normalen Betriebsbedingungen entsprechend behandelt wird, hat der Sauerstoffbedarf (organische Fracht) des Rohabwassers keinen Einfluß auf die Gewässerqualität. (3) Die Werte des Sauerstoffbedarfs lassen sich nur sehr schwer auf die Umweltbelastung übertragen, da das Potential der ökotoxikologischen Auswirkungen nicht in die Berechnung mit eingeht. (4) Kurzfristige Messungen des biologischen Sauerstoffbedarfs sind anwendbar bei der Überwachung von ‘Durchschnittsabwässern’, aber unzuverlässig bei der Beurteilung der biologischen Abbaubarkeit von weiteren spezifischen Substanzen und Produkten. Anstelle des Sauerstoffbedarfs sollten aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht gesehen, mehr ganzheitlich ausgerichtete Evaluierungen, die auf Risikobeurteilung oder auf Analyse von Lebenszyklen basieren, bevorzugt werden.


3Dr. Geert Boeije, Procter & Gamble, Temselaan 100, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium, E-mail:

Dr. Geert Boeije, born in 1971, studied bio-engineering (focusing on environmental technology) at the University of Gent, Belgium. In 1999 he got his PhD degree in Applied Biological Sciences at this University. Since then he has been active at Procter & Gamble's Fabric and Home care business unit, initially as Environmental Toxicologist and currently as Product Safety and Regulatory Affairs manager.

Hans-Joachim Klein, born in 1965, studied chemical engineering (focusing Biochemistry/Organic Chemistry) at the Fresenius University of Applied Sciences in Wiesbaden. In 1995 he joined Procter & Gamble in Schwalbach/Germany and held since then positions in Research & Development, Product Safety and Regulatory Management. In his current position as Manager Technical External Relations, he is responsible for the categories Fabric & Home Care and Professional Products in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.


References

1. Streeter, H. W. and Phelps, E. B.: U.S. Public Health Service Publication No. 149, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1925).Suche in Google Scholar

2. Henze, M., Grady, C. P. L., Gujer, W., Marais, G. v. R. and Matsuo, T.: Wat. Res.21 (1987) 505515.10.1016/0043-1354(87)90058-3Suche in Google Scholar

3. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., Matsuo, T., Wentzel, M. C. and Marais, G. v. R.: Activated Sludge Model No. 2. IAWQ Scientific and Technical Report No. 3, IAWQ, London (1995).10.1016/0273-1223(95)00176-NSuche in Google Scholar

4. Gujer, W., Henze, M., Mino, T. and van Loosdrecht, M.: Wat. Sci. Technol.39 (1999) 1, 183193.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Shanahan, P., Borchardt, D., Henze, M., Rauch, W., Reichert, P., Somlyódy, L. and Vanrolleghem, P.: Wat. Sci. Technol.43 (2001) 5, 19.Suche in Google Scholar

6. APHA, AWWA & WEF: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Prepared and published jointly by American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. (1995).Suche in Google Scholar

7. Verstraete, W., Voets, J. P. and Vanloocke, R.: Wat Res8 (1974) 10771088.10.1016/0043-1354(74)90151-1Suche in Google Scholar

8. Vanrolleghem, P. A., Kong, Z., Rombouts, G. and Verstraete, W.: J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol.59 (1994) 321333.10.1002/jctb.280590403Suche in Google Scholar

9. Ramanathan, M. and Gaudy, A. F.: J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.47 (1972) 19461960.Suche in Google Scholar

10. OECD: Guidelines for testing chemicals. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris (1993).Suche in Google Scholar

11. Pirt, S. J.: Principles of microbe and cell cultivation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, ISBN 0-632-01455-5 (1975).Suche in Google Scholar

12. Dorgeloh, E. and Defrain, M.: Gutachten zur kostenmaessigen Beurteilung von Waschmittelinhaltstoffen bei der Abwasserreinigung, Stand 1998. Institut für Siedlungswasserwirtschaft, Rheinisch-Westfaelische Technische Hochschule Aachen (1998).Suche in Google Scholar

13. Ekama, G. A., Marais, G. v. R., Siebritz, I. P., Pitman, A. R., Keay, G. F. P., Buchan, L., Gerber, A. and Smollen, M.: Theory, design and operation of nutrient removal activated sludge processes. Water Research Commission (University of Cape Town, City council of Johannesburg, National Institute for Water Research of the SCIR) (1984).Suche in Google Scholar

14. Van Leeuwen, C. J. and Hermens, J. L. M.: Risk Assessment of Chemicals: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 0792337409 (1996).10.1007/978-94-015-8520-0Suche in Google Scholar

15. Cowan-Ellsberry, C. E., Belanger, S. E., Versteeg, D. J., Boeije, G. and Feijtel, T. C. J.: The application of environmental risk assessment to detergent ingredients in consumer products. Handbook of Detergents, Part F, Environmental Impact. Marcel Dekker, NY (2004).Suche in Google Scholar

16. European Commission: Commission decision of 14 February 2003 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to laundry detergents and amending Decision 1999/476/EC. Off. Journal of the EU, 22. 3. 2003, L76/2539 (2003).Suche in Google Scholar

17. Belanger, S. E., Nuck, B. A., Gausman, M. M., Brill, J. L., Price, B. B., Rawlings, J. M. and Federle, T. W.: Annual Meeting of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Austin, Texas, November, 2003.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Van Hoof, G., Schowanek, D. and Feijtel, T. C. J.: Tenside Surf. Det.40 (2003) 5, 266275.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Van Hoof, G., Schowanek, D., Feijtel, T. C. J., Boeije, G. and Masscheleyn, P. H.: Tenside Surf. Det.40 (2003) 5, 276287.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2004-9-1
Published Online: 2013-05-08
Published in Print: 2004-12-01

© 2004, Carl Hanser Publisher, Munich

Heruntergeladen am 29.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/113.100236/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen