Animal Metaphors Revisited: New Uses of Art, Literature, and Science in an Environmental Studies Course

Kathleen Hart

doi:10.26613/esic.1.1.23

Artikel

Animal Metaphors Revisited: New Uses of Art, Literature, and Science in an Environmental Studies Course

Kathleen Hart

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. April 2017

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Informationen für Autor*innen

Aus der Zeitschrift Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture Band 1 Heft 1

Abstract

This article describes a team-taught environmental studies course called Animal Metaphors. Focusing on animal metaphors in literature and film, the course emphasizes various cognitive and perceptual biases that lead humans to place ourselves above and beyond nature, making us more likely to engage in practices destructive to the environment. Whereas the first iteration of the course underscored various ways in which humans are less rational or moral than we imagine, the new iteration shifted more of the focus to what inspires and motivates humans, gives us emotional resilience, and best creates conditions for mental well-being as we cooperate and collaborate. This seemed an appropriate tack to take in an age commonly referred to as the “Anthropocene.” We thus continued to examine our status as evolved animals while also calling more attention to spiritual or ecstatic experience, music, humor, and the uniquely human ability for shared intentionality.

Keywords: anthropocene; environmentalism; storytelling; animals; metaphor; cognition; ecocriticism; listening; entrainment

Works Cited

Ambrose, Stanley H.2003. “Did the Super-Eruption of Toba Cause a Human Population Bottleneck?”Journal of Human Evolution45:231–37. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.08.001.10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

Beauvoir, Simone. 2011. The Second Sex. Translated by Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany-Chevallier. New York: Random House.Suche in Google Scholar

Boyd, Brian. 2009. On the Origins of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjf9xvkSuche in Google Scholar

Buss, David, Martie G. Haselton, Todd K. Shackelford, April L. Bleske, and Jerome C. Wakefield. 1998. “Adaptations, Exaptations, and Spandrels.”American Psychologist53 (5): 533–48. doi.10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533.10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533Suche in Google Scholar

Damasio, Antonio. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt.Suche in Google Scholar

Dissanayake, Ellen. 2010. “Art and Intimacy.” in Evolution, Literature and Film: A Reader, edited by Brian Boyd, Joseph Carroll, and Jonathan Gottschall, 144–55. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Duteurtre, Benoît. Forthcoming. “The Question of the Cow.” Translated by Kathleen Hart. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment.Suche in Google Scholar

Easterlin, Nancy. 2012. A Biocultural Approach to Literary Theory and Interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hart, Kathleen Robin, and John Long. 2011. “Animal Metaphors and Metaphorizing Animals: An Integrated Literary, Cognitive and Evolutionary Analysis of Making and Partaking of Stories.”Evolution: Education and Outreach4 (1): 52–63. doi:10.1007/s12052-010-03016.Suche in Google Scholar

hooks, bell. 1992. Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston: South End Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Keltner, Dacher, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2003. “Approaching Awe, a Moral, Spiritual, and Aesthetic Emotion.”Cognition and Emotion17 (2): 297–314. doi:10.1080/02699930302297.10.1080/02699930302297Suche in Google Scholar

Koch, Christof. 2004. “Consciousness: Introduction.” in The Cognitive Neurosciences, edited by Michael Gazzaniga, 1107–10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2010. “Why It Matters How We Frame the Environment.”Environmental Communication4 (1): 70–81. doi:10.1080/17524030903529749.10.1080/17524030903529749Suche in Google Scholar

O'Connor, Flannery. 1971. The Complete Short Stories. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Suche in Google Scholar

Page, Scott. 2008. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830282Suche in Google Scholar

Philipps, Katherine. 2014. “How Diversity Makes Us Smarter.”Scientific American311 (4): 43–47.Suche in Google Scholar

Piff, Paul, Pia Dietze, Matthew Feinberg, Daniel Stancato, and Dacher Keltner. 2015. “Awe, the Small Self, and Prosocial Behavior.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology108 (6): 883–99. doi:10.1037/pspi0000018.10.1037/pspi0000018Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1997. How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Ropeik, David. 2010. How Risky Is It Really? Why Our Fears Don't Always Match the Facts. New York: McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

Scalise Sugiyama, Michele. 2001. “From Theory to Practice: Foundations of an Evolutionary Literary Curriculum.”Style46 (3–4): 317–37. http://www.academia.edu/6507486/From_theory_to_practice_Foundations_of_an_evolutionary_literary_curriculum.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, David Livingstone. 2011. Less than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others. New York: St. Martin's.Suche in Google Scholar

Tolle, Eckhart. 2003. Stillness Speaks. Novato, CA: New World Library.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll. 2005. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences28:675–735. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000129.10.1017/S0140525X05000129Suche in Google Scholar

Veale, Tony, K. Feyaerts, and G. Brône. 2006. “The Cognitive Mechanisms of Adversarial Humor.”Journal of Humor Research19 (3): 305–39. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2006.016.10.1515/HUMOR.2006.016Suche in Google Scholar

Weinstein, Josh A.2015. “Humility, from the Ground Up: A Radical Approach to Literature and Ecology.”Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment22 (4): 759–77. doi:10.1093/isle/isv048.10.1093/isle/isv048Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, Edmund O.2012. The Social Conquest of Earth. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Robert. 1994. The Moral Animal. New York: Random House.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Robert. “The Evolution of Despair.” 1995. Time, August 28, 50–57.10.1002/j.1477-8696.1995.tb06078.xSuche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-04-01

Published in Print: 2017-04-01

Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.26613/esic.1.1.23

Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel

anthropocene; environmentalism; storytelling; animals; metaphor; cognition; ecocriticism; listening; entrainment