Home Granulation of activated sludge in a laboratory upflow sludge blanket reactor
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Granulation of activated sludge in a laboratory upflow sludge blanket reactor

  • Petra Pagáčová EMAIL logo , Miloslav Drtil and Katarína Galbová
Published/Copyright: February 11, 2009
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The creation of anoxic granulated biomass has been monitored in a laboratory USB (Upflow Sludge Blanket) reactor with the volume of 3.6 L. The objective of this research was to verify the possibilities of post-denitrification of residual NO3-N concentrations in treated wastewater (denitrification of 10-20 mg L−1 NO3-N) and to determine the maximum hydraulic and mass loading of the granulated biomass reactor. G-phase from biodiesel production and methanol were both tested as external organic denitrification substrates. The ratio of the organic substrate COD to NO3-N was 6. Only methanol was proven as a suitable organic substrate for this kind of reactor. However, the biomass adaptation to the substrate took over a week. The cultivation of anoxic granulated biomass was reached at hydraulic loading of over 0.35 m h−1. The size of granules was smaller when compared with results found and described in literary reports (granules up to 1 mm); however, settling properties were excellent and denitrification was deemed suitable for the USB reactor. Sludge volume indexes of granules ranged from 35-50 mL g−1 and settling rates reached 11 m h−1. Maximum hydraulic and mass loadings in the USB reactor were 0.95 m3 m−2 h−1 and 6.6 kg m−3 d−1. At higher loading levels, a wash-out of the biomass occurred.

[1] Bhatti, Z. I., Sumida, K., Rouse, J. D., & Furukawa, K. (2001). Characterization of denitrifying granular sludge treating soft groundwater in USB reactor. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 91, 373–377. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80154-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.91.37310.1016/S1389-1723(01)80154-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] Borzacconi, L., Ottonello, G., Castelló, E., Pelaez, H., & Gazzola, A. (2000). Denitrification in carbon and nitrogen removal system for leachate treatment. Water Science and Technology, 40, 145–151. DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00620-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00620-410.1016/S0273-1223(99)00620-4Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cuervo-López, F.M., Martinez, F., Gutiérrez Rojas, M., Noyola, R. A., & Gómez, J. (1999). Effect of nitrogen loading rates and carbon sources on denitrification and sludge settleability in UASB reactor. Water Science and Technology, 40, 123–130. DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00617-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00617-410.1016/S0273-1223(99)00617-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] Eiroa, M., Kennes, C., & Veigga, M. C. (2004). Formaldehyde and urea removal in denitrifying granular sludge blanket reactor. Water Research, 38, 3495–3502. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.055. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.05510.1016/j.watres.2004.04.055Search in Google Scholar

[5] Franco, A., Roca, E., & Lema, J. M. (2006). Granulation in high-load denitrifying USB pulsed reactor. Water Research, 40, 871–880. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.04410.1016/j.watres.2005.11.044Search in Google Scholar

[6] Green, M., Tarre, S., Shnizer, M., Bogdan, B., Armon, R., & Shelet, R. (1994). Groundwater denitrification using an upflow sludge blanket reactor. Water Research, 28, 631–636. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90013-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)90013-210.1016/0043-1354(94)90013-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jenicek, P., Zabranska, J., & Dohanyos, M. (2002). Adaptation of methanogenic granules to denitrification in anaerobic-anoxic USB reactor. Water Science and Technology, 45, 335–340. 10.2166/wst.2002.0366Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kratochvíl, K., Drtil, M., Derco, J., & Bilanin, M. (1996a). Comparison of ethanol and glucose in denitrification of drinking water in USB reactor. Vodohospodársky spravodajca, 39, 15–17. (in Slovak) Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kratochvíl, K., Drtil, M., Hutňan, M., Derco, J., & Fargašová, A. (1996b). Denitrification of drinking water in USB reactor. Vodohospodársky spravodajca, 39, 9–13. (in Slovak) Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kratochvíl, K., Drtil, M., Hutňan, M., Derco, J., & Fargašová, A. (1997). Characteristic of granulated denitrification biomass. Vodní hospodářství, 47, 23–26. (in Slovak) Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lettinga, G., & Hulshoff Pol, L. (1986). Advanced reactor design, operation and economy. Water Science and Technology, 18, 99–108. 10.2166/wst.1986.0166Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lettinga, G., van Velsen, A. F. M., Hobma, S.W., de Zeeuw, W., & Klapwijk, A. (1980). Use of the upflow sludge blanket reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 22, 699–734. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260220402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.26022040210.1002/bit.260220402Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ruiz, G., Jeison, D., & Chamy, R. (2006). Development of denitrifying and methanogenic activities in USB reactors for treatment of wastewater: Effect of COD/N ratio. Process Biochemistry, 41, 1338–1342. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.00710.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.007Search in Google Scholar

[14] Van der Hoek, J. P., & Klapwijk, A. (1987). Nitrate removal from ground water. Water Research, 21, 989–997. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(87)80018-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(87)80018-010.1016/S0043-1354(87)80018-0Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2009-2-11
Published in Print: 2009-4-1

© 2008 Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Biosynthesis of methanol from methane by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b
  2. Influence of reaction medium composition on enzymatic synthesis of galactooligosaccharides and lactulose from lactose concentrates prepared from whey permeate
  3. Immobilization of modified penicillin G acylase on Sepabeads carriers
  4. Granulation of activated sludge in a laboratory upflow sludge blanket reactor
  5. Investigation of the effect of fluid elasticity on a cake filtration process
  6. Lab-scale testing of a low-loaded activated sludge process with membrane filtration
  7. Calcium sulphate scaling in membrane distillation process
  8. Characterization and filtration performance of coating-modified polymeric membranes used in membrane bioreactors
  9. Informational analysis of the grinding process of granular material using a multi-ribbon blender
  10. Effects of vessel baffling on the drawdown of floating solids
  11. N2O catalytic decomposition — effect of pelleting pressure on activity of Co-Mn-Al mixed oxide catalysts
  12. Intelligent control of a pH process
  13. Influence of suspended solid particles on gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient in a system stirred by double impellers
  14. A three-phase nonequilibrium model for catalytic distillation
  15. Membrane processes used for separation of effluents from wire productions
  16. A simple and efficient synthesis of 3-substituted derivatives of pentane-2,4-dione
  17. Formation of hydrated titanium dioxide from seeded titanyl sulphate solution
  18. Pyrolytic and catalytic conversion of rape oil into aromatic and aliphatic fractions in a fixed bed reactor on Al2O3 and Al2O3/B2O3 catalysts
  19. Oxidation of thiophene over copper-manganese mixed oxides
  20. Study of partitioning and dynamics of metals in contaminated soil using modified four-step BCR sequential extraction procedure
  21. Preparation and properties of a new composite photocatalyst based on nanosized titanium dioxide
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11696-008-0092-1/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button