Startseite Comparison of chemical properties of food products processed by conventional and ohmic heating
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Comparison of chemical properties of food products processed by conventional and ohmic heating

  • R. Pereira EMAIL logo , M. Pereira , J. Teixeira und A. Vicente
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Februar 2007
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The effect of ohmic and conventional heat processing of different food products on their chemical and physical parameters was studied. Depending on the food being analysed, parameters such as pH, total solids, ash, titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, total sugars, total fatty acids, total phenolic compounds, and anthocyanins content were determined before and after ohmic and conventional pasteurization techniques and the results were compared using one-way analysis of variance. In goat milk samples treated by ohmic technology the pH value (6.58) and total fatty acids content in milk fat (86.5 mass %) were comparable to those found in milk treated by conventional process, however, ohmically treated samples presented a lower content of lactic acid, 0.13 %. In cloudberry jam samples treated by ohmic technology the results of some of the main parameters tested, such as total sugar content 46.1 mass %, ascorbic acid content 2.83 mass %, and titratable acidity 6.01 mass % (as citric acid) did not show significant differences when compared with samples treated by conventional technology.

[1] de Halleux, D., Piette, G., Buteau, M.-L., and Dostie, M., Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le génie des biosystèmes au Canada 47, 3.41 (2005). Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Castro, I., Teixeira, J. A., Salengke, S., Sastry, S. K., and Vicente, A. A., Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 5, 27 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2003.11.00110.1016/j.ifset.2003.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Parrott, D. L., Food Technol. 46, 68 (1992). Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Icier, F. and Ilicali, C., Food Res. Int. 38, 1135 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.04.00310.1016/j.foodres.2005.04.003Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Leizerson, S. and Shimoni, E., J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 3519 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf048120410.1021/jf0481204Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Icier, F. and Ilicali, C., Eur. Food Res. Technol. 220, 406 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-1043-x10.1007/s00217-004-1043-xSuche in Google Scholar

[7] Assiry, A., Sastry, S. K., and Samaranayake, C., J. Appl. Electrochem. 33, 187 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:102407672133210.1023/A:1024076721332Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists): International Official Methods, 16th Edition, Volume II — Food Composition, Additives, Natural Contaminants. Supplement March 1996. Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Slinkard, K. and Singleton, V. L., Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 28, 49 (1977). Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Giusti, M. M., Rodriguez-Saona, L. E., and Wrolstad, R. E., J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 4631 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf981271k10.1021/jf981271kSuche in Google Scholar

[11] Fuleki, T. and Francis, F. J., J. Food Sci. 33, 78 (1968). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1968.tb00888.x10.1111/j.1365-2621.1968.tb00888.xSuche in Google Scholar

[12] Bligh, E. G. and Dyer, W. J., Can. J. Biochem. Phys. 37, 911 (1959). Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Canada, J. S., PhD. Thesis. Universidad Extramadura, Cáceres, Spain, 2001. Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Todaro, M., Scatassa, M. L., and Giaccone, P., Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 4, 403 (2005). Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Kanwal, R., Ahmed, T., and Mirza, B., Asian J. Plant Sci. 3, 300 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2004.300.30510.3923/ajps.2004.300.305Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Keskin, M., Avşar, Y. K., Biçer, O., and Güler, M. B., Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 28, 531 (2004). Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Kondyli, E. and Katsiari, M. C., Int. J. Dairy Technol. 55, 57 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0307.2002.00028.x10.1046/j.1471-0307.2002.00028.xSuche in Google Scholar

[18] Posati, L. P. and Orr, M. L., Agriculture Handbook No. 8, USDA-ARS, p. 77. Consumer and Food Economics Institute, Washington DC, 1976. Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Greppi, G. F., Ciceri, A., Pasquini, M., Falasch, U., and Enne, G., in Proceedings of IDF-Seminar on Production and Utilization of Ewe’s and Goat’s Milk, p. 47. Crete, Greece 1995. Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Suutarinen, M., PhD. Thesis. Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, 2002. Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Thiem, B., Biol. Lett. 40, 3 (2003). Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Häkkinen, S. H., Heinonen, M., Kärenlampis, S., Mykkänen, H., Ruuskanen, J., and Törrönen, R., Food Res. Int. 32, 345 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00095-210.1016/S0963-9969(99)00095-2Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Kähkönen, M. P., Hopia, A. L., and Heinonen, M., J. Agric. Food Chem. 49, 4076 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf010152t10.1021/jf010152tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Ponting, J. D., Watters, G. G., Forrey, R. R., Jackson, R., and Stanley, W. L., Food Technol. 20, 1365 (1966). Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Molyneux, F., Process Biochem. 6, 17 (1971). Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2007-2-1
Published in Print: 2007-2-1

© 2007 Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Heruntergeladen am 27.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11696-006-0091-z/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen