Startseite Insulin therapy in diabetic kidney disease
Artikel Open Access

Insulin therapy in diabetic kidney disease

  • Yan Liu , Chanyue Zhao , Xiaofen Xiong , Ming Yang und Lin Sun EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. Juni 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the main cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The use of insulin represents a challenge in patients with DKD due to the patient and medication issues. Insulin regimens, insulin dosing, and titration need to be individualized based on the patient's age, renal function, and comorbidities to improve glycemic control and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. Insulin is the primary treatment in all patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and DKD. For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and early stage of DKD, basal insulin combined with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) is recommended. In patients with middle and advanced DKD, it is necessary to adjust the dose of insulin according to stages of DKD, and the use of insulin analogs is recommended. In particular, elderly patients with DKD can simplify their insulin regimen to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. In pregnant women with DKD, insulin requirements also vary based on parity and the stage of pregnancy.

1 Introduction

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a chronic kidney disease (CKD) caused by diabetes, and it is one of the most frequent complications of diabetes. According to the US Renal Data System, the prevalence of CKD in 2017 was 29.1% among patients with diabetes who are aged ≥65 years [1]. DKD can progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which may require renal replacement therapy. Moreover, approximately 30%–50% of ESRD cases involve a diabetic origin [2]. DKD is associated with diverse alterations in glucose and insulin metabolism [3]. Thus, glycemic management in patients with DKD poses a challenging task due to declining kidney function. Insulin is an important component of glucose-lowering therapy. At present, various types of insulin have been widely used in the treatment of DKD. The time of the initial use of insulin, the adjustment of the insulin dose, and the selection of the type of insulin represent clinical issues that need to be resolved urgently [4]. In this review, we mainly discuss the use of insulin in various stages of DKD patients and among special populations.

2 The Value of Insulin in DKD

The progression of CKD and DKD results in changes in glucose metabolism (increased insulin resistance [IR], reduced insulin secretion and insulin clearance rate). Glucose metabolism alterations in patients with CKD or DKD may be expressed as normoglycemia in combination with hyperinsulinemia, hypoglycemia, fasting hyperglycemia, or glucose intolerance depending on many variables [3]. IR is a common feature of patients with CKD or DKD. Multiple factors underlie the insulin-resistant state in CKD and DKD, including metabolic acidosis, uremia with accumulation of uremic toxins, the heightened inflammatory state, vitamin D deficiency, altered intestinal flora, and decreased adiponectin [5]. Besides, both secondary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency associated with CKD reduce the insulin-secreting capacity of pancreatic beta cells [3]. In patients with both diabetes mellitus (DM) and advanced CKD, insulin clearance is markedly decreased. And there is increased resistance to the effects of insulin in the peripheral tissues (due to CKD) that contributes to decreased insulin clearance, leading to higher plasma insulin concentrations [6]. So there is an increased risk of hypoglycemic events in patients with advanced DKD that necessitates lowering the total daily insulin requirements.

Insulin is the primary treatment in all patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and CKD. Insulin therapy in patients with DKD is characterized by two features: (1) patients suffer from a considerably increased risk of severe hypoglycemic episodes [7, 8] and (2) patients exhibit poorer metabolic control than diabetic patients with normal renal function [9]. For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and CKD, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends metformin as the first-line treatment if it is not contraindicated. Other agents, including insulin, should be added to metformin [10].

Decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels lead to altering the pharmacokinetics of glucose-lowering agents [11], increasing the risk of sulfonylurea-related hypoglycemia, biguanide-related lactic acidosis, thiazolidinedione-related water and sodium retention, and weight gain [12]. Many medications are not advised, however, dose adjustments are required in more advanced CKD. Insulin has the advantage of being effective when other agents are not, and it should be considered as part of any combination regimen when hyperglycemia is severe, especially if catabolic features (weight loss, hypertriglyceridemia, and ketosis) are present [10].

At present, various types of insulin have been widely used in the treatment of DKD. The types of insulin used clinically are classified into rapid-acting insulin analogs (insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine), short-acting insulin (regular insulin), intermediate-acting insulin (neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, NPH insulin), long-acting insulin analogs (insulin glargine and insulin detemir), and premixed insulin. Insulin analogs can simulate the physiological insulin spectrum more closely [13,14,15]. Besides insulin analogs exhibit better glycemic control and a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared with human insulin [15].

To achieve glycemic control, physicians have used continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin. In recent years, the use of CSII in T1DM and T2DM has become increasingly popular, as CSII is associated with better glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction with significantly less insulin and overall hypoglycemic events than MDI, especially in patients with poor glycemic control [16,17,18]. What's more, studies have shown that using CSII could reduce urinary albumin/creatinine ratio [19, 20]. Recent studies have examined the efficacy of CSII use in older patients with diabetes. Individuals on CSII exhibit better glycemic outcomes and lower rates of microalbuminuria [21, 22]. But the results were mixed for pregnant women with diabetes. Some data showed a higher rate of large-for-gestational-age neonates in the CSII group compared with the MDI group [23], but there are also data suggesting similar glycemic control and no differences in pregnancy outcome [24]. For patients, there is no consensus on which form of insulin administration is best, but attention should be paid to individualized dose titration.

3 Glycemic Targets in DKD

Based on the currently available evidence, ADA recommends an HbA1c target of <7% for most patients with diabetes. Less stringent HbA1c goals may be appropriate for patients with advanced microvascular or macrovascular complications and extensive comorbid conditions [25]. Some studies have found that <6% or >9% HbA1c increases the risk of death [26, 27]. The European Renal Best Practice also provides recommendations for HbA1c targets. For patients with CKD 3b-5, HbA1c should be controlled at ≤8.5% if they exhibit any of the following risk factors: (1) risk for hypoglycemia; (2) poor patient motivation and attitude; (3) decreased general life expectancy; (4) cardiovascular disease; and (5) presence of microvascular complications. For patients without the above risk factors, if the diabetes duration is >10 years, HbA1c should be controlled at ≤8.0%; if ≤10 years, then HbA1c should be controlled at ≤7.5% [28]. DKD is a chronic disease that may progress over time. Glycemic targets should be reevaluated over time to balance the risks and benefits.

4 Insulin Therapy in DKD G1-2

At present, data about insulin regimens, insulin dosing, and titration in patients with various stages of CKD are limited [4]. It is generally advocated that the type, dosage, and frequency of administration of insulin and oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) should be individually tailored according to the patient's renal function, life expectancy, and comorbid conditions [25]. For patients with T2DM and CKD1-2, most OADs do not need to be reduced. Charpentier et al [29] and the American College of Physicians recommended no change in insulin dose if GFR >50 mL/min/1.73m2 [30]. A large number of clinical studies have demonstrated that the treatment of basal insulin combined with OADs has benefited numerous patients with DKD, and ADA has also recommended this program [10, 31, 32]. If patients with T2DM and CKD1-2 present with blood glucose levels ≥300 mg/dL (16.7 mmol/L) or HbA1c >10% (86 mmol/mol) or symptoms of hyperglycemia (i.e., polyuria or polydipsia) or evidence of catabolism, insulin therapy should be initiated based on OADs treatment. Janka et al [32] demonstrated that initiating insulin treatment by adding basal insulin once daily to OADs was safer and more effective than beginning twice-daily injections of premixed insulin and discontinuing OADs in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with OADs. Stepwise addition of prandial insulin is recommended in patients inadequately controlled on basal insulin plus OADs. The results of the Full STEP Study showed that stepwise prandial insulin intensification provided glycemic control non-inferior to a full basal-bolus regimen after 32 weeks with significantly lower hypoglycemia risk and improved patient satisfaction [33].

Typically, T1DM patients will require initiation with MDI of insulin at the time of diagnosis. Short-acting insulin or rapid-acting insulin analogs are typically administered 0–15 min before meals together with one or more daily separate injections of intermediate- or long-acting insulin. Two or three pre-mixed insulin injections per day may be used [34]. Patients with T1DM and CKD1-2 can continue to use the original treatment regimen.

5 Insulin Therapy in DKD G3-5

With the development of DKD, although IR increases and renal glucose synthesis decreases, the metabolic rate of insulin decreases, resulting in prolonged insulin action, and increased risk of hypoglycemia in these patients [35, 36]. Careful assessment of the patient's daily glycemic pattern is essential, and switching from insulin to OADs that are not contraindicated in DKD would be appropriate in patients with less advanced renal disease (up to stage G3b). Targeting IR with pioglitazone is effective whose active metabolites are mainly excreted by the liver. Repaglinide can also be used because it is predominantly metabolized by the liver. Besides, it is necessary to reduce the dose of insulin to prevent hypoglycemia. For example, when GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2, the dose of insulin glargine and insulin detemir would be reduced by 29.7% and 27.3%, respectively [37]. The use of insulin aspart in CKD patients at different stages does not require a dose adjustment, but insulin lispro and human insulin need to be reduced when eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 [37]. According to the recommendations of the Duke University Medical Center Glycemic Safety Committee, the total daily dose typically needs to be quickly adjusted by 30%, 50%, and 60% in stages 3, 4, and 5 of CKD, respectively [38]. The American Association of Physicians suggests that when GFR is 10–50 mL/min, insulin is reduced to 75% of the total daily dose; however, when GFR is <10 mL/min, insulin is reduced to 50% [39]. Guidelines from different associations for the usage of insulin are provided in Table 1.

Table 1

Recommendation on insulin dose titration

Duke University Medical Center Glycemic Safety Committee
GFR (mL/min/1.73m2) % reduction of TDD
≥60 No reduction
30–59 30
15–29 50
<15 60
India expert committee
GFR (mL/min/1.73m2) % reduction of TDD
>60 No reduction
15–60 25
<15 50
American Association of Physicians
GFR (mL/min/1.73m2) % reduction of TDD
>50 No reduction
10–50 25
<10 50
  1. GFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; TDD, total daily dose.

The British Association of Clinical Diabetologists and the British Association of Nephrology believe that premixed insulin may be helpful for diabetic patients with CKD3–5 who receive insulin once a day but have poor blood glucose control [40]. The International Diabetes Federation guidelines for postprandial blood glucose management suggest that premixed insulin analogs can better control postprandial blood glucose than pre-mixed human insulin [41]. It is suggested that the adjustment of insulin type in patients with renal insufficiencies, such as the use of insulin analogs, may bring clinical benefits to patients, especially patients with CKD3-5.

Various uratoxins can act on insulin receptors, inhibit the production of the second messenger of insulin in cells, affect insulin secretion, or lead to IR [42,43,44]. Dialysis reduces toxins, improves peripheral IR, and decreases the need for exogenous insulin [45, 46]. For patients who have already taken the established insulin treatment regimen and started dialysis, the insulin dose should decrease to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia by closely monitoring blood glucose and readjusting the insulin dose according to the glucose value [29]. A study demonstrated that a 25% reduction in basal insulin after hemodialysis can avoid hypoglycemia [47]. However, continuous absorption of glucose from the dialysate may impair blood glucose control for dialysis patients, and the requirements for insulin increase by 2- to 3-fold [48, 49]. Intraperitoneal insulin usually leads to better blood glucose control and lower insulin demand than subcutaneous injection [50,51,52]. However, intraperitoneal insulin may have adverse effects on plasma lipids [51, 53]. In addition, in DKD hemodialysis patients, saxagliptin can significantly improve postprandial blood glucose and HbA1c compared with insulin [54]. Therefore, the insulin regimen of diabetic ESRD patients should be adjusted in a timely fashion after receiving dialysis treatment, and these patients should switch to noninsulin hypoglycemic drugs as appropriate.

Some diabetic dialysis patients may prefer insulin analogs [55,56,57]. One set of data showed that diabetic ESRD patients who maintained hemodialysis had higher levels of regular insulin and insulin analogs but a lower metabolic response to regular insulin [58, 59]. In addition, compared with regular insulin, insulin lispro has a faster effect, higher peak concentration, and shorter action time in T2DM hemodialysis patients [55, 58, 60]. In patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis, the glycemic variability of insulin detemir is reduced compared with that of insulin glargine [61]. In a study of peritoneal dialysis (PD), diabetic patients undergoing PD treated with insulin detemir and insulin aspart exhibited reduced HbA1c levels without significant increases in hypoglycemic events [62].

6 Hypoglycemia

The increased risk of severe hypoglycemia in patients with DKD is mainly due to the decline in renal function, the accumulation of insulin in blood circulation, and insufficient compensatory gluconeogenesis [4, 63,64,65]. A retrospective cohort analysis of approximately 244,000 patients with and without diabetes showed that patients with CKD exhibited an increased frequency of hypoglycemia events compared with those without CKD [66]. Severe hypoglycemia with DKD leads to the risk of premature death [67,68,69]. Long-term hypoglycemia can lead to brain damage, seizures, arrhythmia, coma, or death [70,71,72,73,74]. In addition, previous hypoglycemia can lead to a reduced response to subsequent attacks, resulting in recurrent hypoglycemic circulation [75].

Proper adjustment of the dose of hypoglycemic agents such as reduction of insulin dose, avoidance of missed meals, and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) may lower the risk of hypoglycemia. In diabetic patients with CKD, the dosage of insulin should be adjusted according to the level of renal function to prevent hypoglycemia. In a retrospective study, Biesenbach et al [76]. found that patients with T2DM received insulin treatment, and the demand for insulin decreased gradually from CKD 1–5 (from 0.68 IU/(kg/day) to 0.33 IU/(kg/day)).

The risk of hypoglycemia is related to the pharmacokinetic characteristics of insulin [77, 78]. These disadvantages may be overcome by designing optimally absorbed analogs. Long-acting insulin analogs, including U300, insulin degludec, exhibit a flatter pharmacological curve with no obvious peak value, and less within-subject variation is noted compared with NPH [14, 79]. Furthermore, irrespective of kidney function, compared with glargine U300, insulin degludec has a reduction in HbA1c from baseline and a lower total daily insulin dose [80]. Rapid-acting insulin analogs have a quicker onset and peak and shorter duration of action, and are not prone to hypoglycemia before the next meal compared with regular human insulin [58, 60, 81, 82]. Insulin lispro, aspart, and glulisine do not exhibit obvious pharmacokinetic changes even in patients with severe renal insufficiency [57, 58, 83]. In insulin-treated T2DM, compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily, insulin degludec/insulin aspart 70/30 twice-daily can improve long-term glycemic control with a lower dose and less nocturnal hypoglycemia [84, 85]. Switching from basal insulin to Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (Ryzodeg) does not increase the burden on patient, and is more effective in reducing blood glucose after dinner and before bedtime without increasing the incidence of hypoglycemia [86]. Regardless of T1DM or T2DM, oral insulin agent ORMD-0801 can reduce HbA1c without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia [87, 88], but its effect in DKD needs to be further explored.

Besides avoiding hypoglycemia, considerations for DKD management include a desire to mitigate the high risks of CKD and CVD progression. Intensive diabetes education and care management can be effective in providing significant improvements in patient outcomes, glycemic control, and better quality of life [89]. Patient SMBG may help with self-management and medication adjustment, particularly in individuals taking insulin. Glucose monitoring allows patients to evaluate their response to therapy and assess whether glycemic targets are being safely achieved [25]. For patients with T2DKD, some glucose-lowering medications having effects on the kidney that are direct, not mediated through glycemia could be prioritized, such as SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs [90].

7 Insulin Treatment in Special Populations

7.1 Insulin in elderly patients with DKD

Age is an important risk factor for renal damage and severe hypoglycemia [91,92,93]. Progressive renal insufficiency, strict glycemic control, unexpected weight loss, and failure to adjust drug doses make elderly patients with DKD at higher risk of hypoglycemia [94,95,96,97,98,99]. The continued use of insulin in elderly people with a high risk of hypoglycemia and limited future benefits suggests that insulin treatment options need to be adjusted to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. When patients find that the complexity of insulin therapy is beyond their self-management ability, reducing the insulin dose may not be sufficient, so it is necessary to simplify the insulin treatment plan based on the individual situation of the patient [34, 100, 101].

Basic insulin injection therapy once daily may be a reasonable choice for many elderly patients if the glycemic target can be met [34, 101,102,103]. In a prospective study, patients with T2DM over the age of 70 simplified their treatment by switching to basal insulin plus noninsulin preparations once daily [31]. The simplified insulin regimens reduced the risk of hypoglycemia without affecting blood glucose control, and patients also noted improvements in diabetes-related pain [31, 101, 104, 105]. The use of a mixed insulin regimen one, two, or three times a day may increase the risk of hypoglycemia and limit diet and lifestyle flexibility [106, 107]. Janka et al [106] found that injecting insulin glargine once a morning was a simple and effective method for elderly type 2 diabetic patients with poor oral drug control, and this regimen can more effectively control glucose and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia compared with the use of 70/30 twice a day alone.

If elderly patients receive basal insulin at bedtime, then the injection time should be postponed until morning [101, 108]. Postprandial blood glucose contributes more to overall hyperglycemia than fasting blood glucose in elderly patients [109]. Thus, administering basal insulin in the morning is more tolerable, and higher doses of insulin can be used to titrate to fasting blood glucose levels and reduce the risk of early-morning hypoglycemia [108]. Saudek et al [110] suggested not using too much NPH insulin before dinner given that its activity tended to peak in the middle of the night, leading to hypoglycemia at night and uncontrolled blood glucose in the morning.

Patients with large postprandial blood glucose fluctuations may require rapid-acting insulin analogs [101, 108]. The insulin dose should be tailored according to the amount of carbohydrates taken at meals. The World Journal of Diabetes recommends that if meal consumption is reduced by 50%, the insulin should be reduced by 50%; if the meal consumed is small or if there is no meal due to medical intervention, insulin will not be given or reduced to 25% [111]. However, rapid-acting insulin needs to take into account the patient's cognitive ability and support system [101, 112].

7.2 Insulin in pregnant patients with DKD

Proper control of maternal blood glucose levels during pregnancy can improve maternal and fetal outcomes in DKD pregnant patients [113,114,115,116,117]. Although the use of insulin can cause maternal hypoglycemia [118,119,120] and increase maternal weight [121,122,123], it has been shown that insulin when used at therapeutic concentrations does not directly affect the fetus through the placenta [124,125,126], and maternal insulin treatment can reduce poor perinatal prognosis [113, 115]. Oral hypoglycemic drugs, such as metformin and glibenclamide, will have some benefits on weight control and insulin sensitivity [127, 128], but they can cause giant fetuses and skeletal malformations by entering the fetus through the placenta as well as maternal complications due to the massive transfer between the placenta or ineffective blood glucose control [129,130,131,132]. Therefore, insulin may be the first choice of hypoglycemic drugs for patients with DKD during pregnancy.

During pregnancy, most diabetic patients use a multidose insulin regimen, which includes rapid-acting insulin up to three times a day and medium-/long-acting insulin [133]. Ideally, pregnant women should receive basic or bolus insulin treatment. The basal insulin dose should be <50% of the total daily dose, and prandial insulin matched with mealtime and size should be >50% [134]. Premixed insulin is also a suitable choice. Premixed insulin analogs and premixed human insulin exhibit no significant differences in glycemic control or fetal outcome [135, 136].

During pregnancy, insulin requirements also vary with parity and the stage of pregnancy. Insulin demands increase with parity [137]. In the first 3 months, women with diabetes treated with insulin may reduce insulin requirements [129, 134, 138, 139]. During this period, glucose control is more unstable with a trend of reduced fasting blood glucose and increased postprandial drift and nocturnal hypoglycemia [113, 140]. Thus, it is common to reduce the dose by approximately 10% compared with that before pregnancy [113]. Given that IR increases exponentially in the second and early third trimesters of pregnancy, this situation is quickly reversed by approximately 16 weeks [129, 134, 138]. At the end of the third trimester of pregnancy, the requirement for insulin tends to stabilize or decrease slightly with placental aging [141].

The incidence of hypoglycemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycemia, increases in diabetic women in the first trimester of pregnancy [142, 143]. An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline recommends that diabetic women who receive insulin therapy and want to conceive should be treated with insulin lispro or insulin aspart instead of regular insulin, and those who successfully used long-acting insulin analogs before pregnancy can continue to use this treatment during pregnancy [144]. Studies have shown that the use of insulin detemir can improve fasting blood glucose levels and reduce the incidence of hypoglycemia without increasing the incidence of adverse pregnancy and drug reactions in pregnant women with diabetes [145,146,147,148,149]. A randomized controlled study reported no nocturnal hypoglycemia in the detemir group, and hypoglycemia occurred before lunch; however in the NPH group, hypoglycemia was irregular, and nocturnal hypoglycemia threatened the safety of the fetus [147].

A large randomized controlled trial showed that when using a basal-bolus therapy with NPH insulin in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, insulin aspart could better control post-prandial blood glucose and prevent severe hypoglycemia compared with human regular insulin [150]. Compared with regular insulin, insulin lispro reduces the rates of neonatal jaundice [151], the peak of postprandial blood glucose fluctuation [152], maternal hypoglycemia, and the total demand for insulin during pregnancy [153]. Given the rapid development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, Kitzmiller et al. suggest that insulin lispro should be used cautiously in pregnant women who may have severe preexisting retinal ischemia [154]. However, a prospective, open study observed no difference in the progression of retinopathy [155].

8 Conclusion

Insulin therapy is an adequate option for improving glycemic control in DKD. However, a variety of factors, such as renal insufficiency and concomitant therapy (drugs, dialysis, and immunosuppressive therapy), may make insulin therapy challenging. Decreased renal function will alter the clearance and metabolism of insulin, and too strict glycemic control will increase the risk of hypoglycemia, especially in the elderly and patients with severely impaired renal function. Factors, such as different stages of DKD and pregnancy also make insulin treatment more difficult. Therefore, closely monitoring blood-glucose levels, carefully formulating individual blood-glucose control targets and individual insulin doses, educating different patients, and improving the vigilance of hypoglycemia are all essential elements of DKD management.


#

Yan Liu and Chanyue Zhao contributed equally to this work.


  1. Source of Funding

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81730018) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1314002).

  2. Conflict of interest

    Lin Sun is an Editorial Board Member of the journal. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of this editor and his research groups.

REFERENCES

[1] International Diabetes Federation. Idf Diabetes Atlas. 9th Edition. 2019; Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/data/en/. Accessed on August 1, 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Ruiz-Ortega M, Rodrigues-Diez RR, Lavoz C, Rayego-Mateos S. Special issue “Diabetic nephropathy: diagnosis, prevention and treatment”. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 813.10.3390/jcm9030813Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Iglesias P, Diez JJ. Insulin therapy in renal disease. Diabetes Obes Metab 2008; 10: 811–23.10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00802.xSuche in Google Scholar

[4] Rajput R, Sinha B, Majumdar S, Shunmugavelu M, Bajaj S. Consensus statement on insulin therapy in chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017; 127: 10–20.10.1016/j.diabres.2017.02.032Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Rahhal MN, Gharaibeh NE, Rahimi L, Ismail-Beigi F. Disturbances in insulin-glucose metabolism in patients with advanced renal disease with and without diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 104: 4949–66.10.1210/jc.2019-00286Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Maki KC, Mckenney JM, Farmer MV, Reeves MS, Dicklin MR. Indices of insulin sensitivity and secretion from a standard liquid meal test in subjects with type 2 diabetes, impaired or normal fasting glucose. Nutr J 2009; 8: 22.10.1186/1475-2891-8-22Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Arem R. Hypoglycemia associated with renal failure. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1989; 18: 103–21.10.1016/S0889-8529(18)30391-8Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Mühlhauser I, Toth G, Sawicki PT, Berger M. Severe hypoglycemia in type I diabetic patients with impaired kidney function. Diabetes Care 1991; 14: 344–6.10.2337/diacare.14.4.344Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Bending JJ, Pickup JC, Viberti GC, Keen H. Glycaemic control in diabetic nephropathy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984; 288: 1187–91.10.1136/bmj.288.6425.1187Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] American Diabetes Association. Addendum. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes 2020. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: S98–S110.10.2337/dc20-S009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Lo C, Toyama T, Wang Y, Lin J, Hirakawa Y, Jun M, et al. Insulin and glucose-lowering agents for treating people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 9: CD011798.10.1002/14651858.CD011798.pub2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Scheen AJ. Pharmacokinetic considerations for the treatment of diabetes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2013; 9: 529–50.10.1517/17425255.2013.777428Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Hasslacher C, Vogt C, Raupp D, Dreyhaupt J. Insulin requirement in patients with type 1 diabetes with reduced renal function: human insulin versus analogue insulin. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2007; 132: 2500–4.10.1055/s-2007-993090Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Mathieu C, Gillard P, Benhalima K. Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017; 13: 385–99.10.1038/nrendo.2017.39Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Home PD. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues and their clinical consequences. Diabetes Obes Metab 2012; 14: 780–8.10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01580.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Casciano O, Cirillo P, Simeon V, Chiodini P, et al. The effects of subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple insulin injections on glucose variability in young adults with type 1 diabetes: the 2-year follow-up of the Observational METRO Study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018; 20: 117–26.10.1089/dia.2017.0334Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Pickup JC, Reznik Y, Sutton AJ. Glycemic control during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in type 2 diabetes: individual patient data meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 715–22.10.2337/dc16-2201Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Grunberger G, Bhargava A, Ly T, Zisser H, Ilag LL, Malone J, et al. Human regular U-500 insulin via continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in adults with type 2 diabetes: The VIVID study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22: 434–41.10.1111/dom.13947Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Rosenlund S, Hansen TW, Andersen S, Rossing P. Effect of 4 years subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment on albuminuria, kidney function and HbA1c compared with multiple daily injections: a longitudinal follow-up study. Diabet Med 2015; 32: 1445–52.10.1111/dme.12950Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Lepore G, Bruttomesso D, Bonomo M, Dodesini AR, Costa S, Meneghini E, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is more effective than multiple daily insulin injections in preventing albumin excretion rate increase in Type 1 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2009; 26: 602–8.10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02736.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Grammes J, Küstner E, Dapp A, Hummel M, Kämmer JC, Kubiak T, et al. Comparative characteristics of older people with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or insulin injection therapy: data from the German/Austrian DPV registry. Diabet Med 2020; 37: 856–62.10.1111/dme.14218Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Briganti EM, Summers JC, Fitzgerald ZA, Lambers LNJ, Cohen ND. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion can be used effectively and safely in older patients with type 1 diabetes: long-term follow-up. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018; 20: 783–6.10.1089/dia.2018.0215Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Hauffe F, Schaefer-Graf UM, Fauzan R, Schohe AL, Scholle D, Sedlacek L, et al. Higher rates of large-for-gestational-age newborns mediated by excess maternal weight gain in pregnancies with Type 1 diabetes and use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs multiple dose insulin injection. Diabet Med 2019; 36: 158–66.10.1111/dme.13861Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Abell SK, Suen M, Pease A, Boyle JA, Soldatos G, Regan J, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and insulin requirements in women with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections: Cohort Study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017; 19: 280–7.10.1089/dia.2016.0412Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: S66–S76.10.2337/dc20-S006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Slinin Y, Ishani A, Rector T, Fitzgerald P, Macdonald R, Tacklind J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and albuminuria in patients with diabetes and CKD: a systematic review for a KDOQI clinical practice guideline. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 60: 747–69.10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.017Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Huang ES, Liu JY, Moffet HH, John PM, Karter AJ. Glycemic control, complications, and death in older diabetic patients: the diabetes and aging study. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1329–36.10.2337/dc10-2377Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Guideline Development Group. Clinical Practice Guideline on management of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease stage 3b or higher (eGFR <45 mL/min). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015; 30: 1–142.10.1093/ndt/gfv100Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Charpentier G, Riveline JP, Varroud-Vial M. Management of drugs affecting blood glucose in diabetic patients with renal failure. Diabetes Metab 2000; 26 Suppl 4: 73–85.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Coyle JD. Book review: drug prescribing in renal failure: dosing guidelines for adults. 4th Edition. Ann Pharmacother 1999; 33: 1377.10.1177/106002809903301206Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Munshi MN, Slyne C, Segal AR, Saul N, Lyons C, Weinger K. Simplification of insulin regimen in older adults and risk of hypoglycemia. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176: 1023–5.10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2288Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Janka HU, Plewe G, Riddle MC, Kliebe-Frisch C, Schweitzer MA, Yki-Järvinen H. Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 254–9.10.2337/diacare.28.2.254Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Rodbard HW, Visco VE, Andersen H, Hiort LC, Shu DHW. Treatment intensification with stepwise addition of prandial insulin aspart boluses compared with full basal-bolus therapy (FullSTEP Study): a randomised, treat-to-target clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 30–7.10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70090-1Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Silver B, Ramaiya K, Andrew SB, Fredrick O, Bajaj S, Kalra S, et al. EADSG guidelines: insulin therapy in diabetes. Diabetes Ther 2018; 9: 449–92.10.1007/s13300-018-0384-6Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Williams ME, Garg R. Glycemic management in ESRD and earlier stages of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2014; 63: S22–38.10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.10.049Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Gosmanov AR, Wall BM, Gosmanova EO. Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic kidney disease. Am J Med Sci 2014; 347: 406–13.10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000185Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Kulozik F, Hasslacher C. Insulin requirements in patients with diabetes and declining kidney function: differences between insulin analogues and human insulin? Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2013; 4: 113–21.10.1177/2042018813501188Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Barnard K, Batch BC, Lien LF. Subcutaneous insulin: a guide for dosing regimens in the hospital (Chapter 2). In: Lien LF, Cox ME, Feinglos MN, Corsino L, editors. Glycemic control in the hospitalized patient: a comprehensive clinical guide. 1st ed. New York: Springer. 2010; p. 7–16.10.1007/978-1-60761-006-9_2Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Bennett WM, Aronoff GR, Morrison G, Golper TA, Pulliam J, Wolfson M, et al. Drug prescribing in renal failure: dosing guidelines for adults. Am J Kidney Dis 1983; 3: 155–93.10.1016/S0272-6386(83)80060-2Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Winocour P, Bain SC, Chowdhury TA, De P, Pokrajac A, Fogarty D, et al. Managing hyperglycaemia in patients with diabetes and diabetic nephropathy–chronic kidney disease: summary of recommendations 2018. Br J Diabetes 2018; 18: 78–89.10.15277/bjd.2018.172Suche in Google Scholar

[41] International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group. Guideline for management of postmeal glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 103: 256–68.10.1016/j.diabres.2012.08.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Akmal M, Massry SG, Goldstein DA, Fanti P, Weisz A, Defronzo RA. Role of parathyroid hormone in the glucose intolerance of chronic renal failure. J Clin Invest 1985; 75: 1037–44.10.1172/JCI111765Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Folli F, Sinha MK, Brancaccio D, Caro JF. Insulin resistance in uremia: in vitro model in the rat liver using human serum to study mechanisms. Metabolism 1986; 35: 989–98.10.1016/0026-0495(86)90034-XSuche in Google Scholar

[44] Fadda GZ, Hajjar SM, Perna AF, Zhou XJ, Lipson LG, Massry SG. On the mechanism of impaired insulin secretion in chronic renal failure. J Clin Invest 1991; 87: 255–61.10.1172/JCI114979Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[45] Amico JA, Klein I. Diabetic management in patients with renal failure. Diabetes Care 1981; 4: 430–4.10.2337/diacare.4.3.430Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Biesenbach G, Bodlaj G, Ebner S, Biesenbach P, Pieringer H. Metabolic control and vascular diseases under oral antidiabetic drug versus insulin therapy and/or diet alone during the first year of hemo-dialysis in type 2 diabetic patients with ESRD. Int Urol Nephrol 2011; 43: 1155–60.10.1007/s11255-010-9804-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Sobngwi E, Enoru S, Ashuntantang G, Azabji-Kenfack M, Dehayem M, Onana A, et al. Day-to-day variation of insulin requirements of patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1409–12.10.2337/dc09-2176Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Diaz-Buxo JA. Peritoneal dialysis modality selection for the adult, the diabetic, and the geriatric patient. Perit Dial Int 1997; 17: S28–31.10.1177/089686089701703S07Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Rottembourg J, Issad B, Allouache M. Insulin prescription, glycemic control, and diabetic complications in diabetics treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1993; 13: 232–5.10.1177/089686089301302S57Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Mak RH. Impact of end-stage renal disease and dialysis on glycemic control. Semin Dial 2000; 13: 4–8.10.1046/j.1525-139x.2000.00007.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Nevalainen PI, Lahtela JT, Mustonen J, Pasternack A. Subcutaneous and intraperitoneal insulin therapy in diabetic patients on CAPD. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16: S288–91.10.1177/089686089601601S54Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Quellhorst E. Insulin therapy during peritoneal dialysis: pros and cons of various forms of administration. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: S92–6.10.1681/ASN.V13suppl_1s92Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Almalki MH, Altuwaijri MA, Almehthel MS, Sirrs SM, Singh RS. Subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal insulin for patients with diabetes mellitus on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: meta-analysis of non-randomized clinical trials. Clin Invest Med 2012; 35: E132–43.10.25011/cim.v35i3.16589Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Abe M, Higuchi T, Moriuchi M, Okamura M, Tei R, Nagura C, et al. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy: A randomized open-label prospective trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016; 116: 244–52.10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.034Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Aisenpreis U, Pfützner A, Giehl M, Keller F, Jehle PM. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin Lispro compared with regular insulin in haemodialysis patients with diabetes mellitus. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 5–6.10.1093/ndt/14.suppl_4.5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[56] Czock D, Aisenpreis U, Rasche FM, Jehle PM. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lispro-insulin in hemodialysis patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003; 41: 492–7.10.5414/CPP41492Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Holmes G, Galitz L, Hu P, Lyness W. Pharmacokinetics of insulin aspart in obesity, renal impairment, or hepatic impairment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 60: 469–76.10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02476.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] Rave K, Heise T, Pfutzner A, Heinemann L, Sawicki PT. Impact of diabetic nephropathy on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of insulin in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 886–90.10.2337/diacare.24.5.886Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Roussel R, Lorraine J, Rodriguez A, Salaun-Martin C. Overview of data concerning the safe use of antihyperglycemic medications in type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Adv Ther 2015; 32: 1029–64.10.1007/s12325-015-0261-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] Ruggenenti P, Flores C, Aros C, Ene-Iordache B, Trevisan R, Ottomano C, et al. Renal and metabolic effects of insulin lispro in type 2 diabetic subjects with overt nephropathy. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 502–9.10.2337/diacare.26.2.502Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Savu O, Elian V, Steriade O, Teodoru I, Mihut S, Tacu C, et al. The impact of basal insulin analogues on glucose variability in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease. Int Urol Nephrol 2016; 48: 265–70.10.1007/s11255-015-1175-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[62] Gómez AM, Vallejo S, Ardila F, Muñoz OM, Ruiz ÁJ, Sanabria M, et al. Impact of a basal-bolus insulin regimen on metabolic control and risk of hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes undergoing peritoneal dialysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018; 12: 129–35.10.1177/1932296817730376Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[63] Lubowsky ND, Siegel R, Pittas AG. Management of glycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus and CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 50: 865–79.10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.08.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Gerich JE, Meyer C, Woerle HJ, Stumvoll M. Renal gluconeogenesis: its importance in human glucose homeostasis. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 382–91.10.2337/diacare.24.2.382Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[65] Detournay B, Simon D, Guillausseau PJ, Joly D, Verges B, Attali C, et al. Chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes patients in France: prevalence, influence of glycaemic control and implications for the pharmacological management of diabetes. Diabetes Metab 2012; 38: 102–12.10.1016/j.diabet.2011.11.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[66] Moen MF, Zhan M, Hsu VD, Walker LD, Einhorn LM, Seliger SL, et al. Frequency of hypoglycemia and its significance in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 1121–7.10.2215/CJN.00800209Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[67] Papademetriou V, Lovato L, Doumas M, Nylen E, Mottl A, Cohen RM, et al. Chronic kidney disease and intensive glycemic control increase cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Kidney Int 2015; 87: 649–59.10.1038/ki.2014.296Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Zoungas S, Patel A, Chalmers J, De Galan BE, Li Q, Billot L, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and risks of vascular events and death. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1410–8.10.1056/NEJMoa1003795Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Kong APS, Yang X, Luk A, Ma RCW, So WY, Ozaki R, et al. Severe hypoglycemia identifies vulnerable patients with type 2 diabetes at risk for premature death and all-site cancer: the Hong Kong diabetes registry. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 1024–31.10.2337/dc13-2507Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, Cryer P, Dagogo-Jack S, Fish L, et al. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 1384–95.10.2337/dc12-2480Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[71] Yu T-M, Lin C-L, Chang S-N, Sung F-C, Kao C-H. Increased risk of stroke in patients with chronic kidney disease after recurrent hypoglycemia. Neurology 2014; 83: 686–94.10.1212/WNL.0000000000000711Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] Feinkohl I, Aung PP, Keller M, Robertson CM, Morling JR, Mclachlan S, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and cognitive decline in older people with type 2 diabetes: the Edinburgh type 2 diabetes study. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 507–15.10.2337/dc13-1384Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Lee AK, Rawlings AM, Lee CJ, Gross AL, Huang ES, Sharrett AR, et al. Severe hypoglycaemia, mild cognitive impairment, dementia and brain volumes in older adults with type 2 diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort study. Diabetologia 2018; 61: 1956–65.10.1007/s00125-018-4668-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[74] Lee RH, Sloane R, Pieper C, Lyles KW, Adler RA, Van Houtven C, et al. Glycemic control and insulin treatment alter fracture risk in older men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34: 2045–51.10.1002/jbmr.3826Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[75] Cryer PE. Diverse causes of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in diabetes. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2272–9.10.1056/NEJMra031354Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[76] Biesenbach G, Raml A, Schmekal B, Eichbauer-Sturm G. Decreased insulin requirement in relation to GFR in nephropathic Type 1 and insulin-treated Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 642–5.10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01025.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[77] Pettus J, Santos Cavaiola T, Tamborlane WV, Edelman S. The past, present, and future of basal insulins. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016; 32: 478–96.10.1002/dmrr.2763Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[78] Lepore M, Pampanelli S, Fanelli C, Porcellati F, Bartocci L, Di Vincenzo A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro. Diabetes 2000; 49: 2142–8.10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2142Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] Scholtz HE, Pretorius SG, Wessels DH, Becker RHA. Pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic variability: assessment of insulin glargine, NPH insulin and insulin ultralente in healthy volunteers using a euglycaemic clamp technique. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 1988–95.10.1007/s00125-005-1916-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Pieber TR, Bajaj HS, Heller SR, Jia T, Khunti K, Klonoff DC, et al. Impact of kidney function on the safety and efficacy of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U300 in people with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the CONCLUDE trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022; 24: 332–6.10.1111/dom.14564Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[81] Brange J, Owens DR, Kang S, Vølund A. Monomeric insulins and their experimental and clinical implications. Diabetes Care 1990; 13: 923–54.10.2337/diacare.13.9.923Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[82] Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Consumers [Internet]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) Rockville (MD). 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

[83] Urata H, Mori K, Emoto M, Yamazaki Y, Motoyama K, Morioka T, et al. Advantage of insulin glulisine over regular insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal insufficiency. J Ren Nutr 2015; 25: 129–34.10.1053/j.jrn.2014.07.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Christiansen JS, Niskanen L, Rasmussen S, Johansen T, Fulcher G. Lower rates of hypoglycemia during maintenance treatment with insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30: a combined analysis of two Phase 3a studies in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes 2016; 8: 720–8.10.1111/1753-0407.12355Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Taneda S, Hyllested-Winge J, Gall M-A, Kaneko S, Hirao K. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in insulin-experienced Japanese subjects with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: subgroup analysis of a Pan-Asian, treat-to-target Phase 3 Trial. J Diabetes 2017; 9: 243–7.10.1111/1753-0407.12407Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[86] Cho KY, Nakamura A, Oba-Yamamoto C, Tsuchida K, Yanagiya S, Manda N, et al. Switching to once-daily insulin degludec/insulin as-part from basal insulin improves postprandial glycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Metab J 2020; 44: 532–41.10.4093/dmj.2019.0093Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[87] Eldor R, Neutel J, Homer K, Kidron M. Efficacy and safety of 28-day treatment with oral insulin (ORMD-0801) in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23: 2529–38.10.1111/dom.14499Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[88] Eldor R, Arbit E, Corcos A, Kidron M. Glucose-reducing effect of the ORMD-0801 oral insulin preparation in patients with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e59524.10.1371/journal.pone.0059524Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[89] Gosmanov AR, Gosmanova EO, Kovesdy CP. Evaluation and management of diabetic and non-diabetic hypoglycemia in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31: 8–15.10.1093/ndt/gfv258Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[90] American Diabetes Association. 11. Microvascular complications and foot care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: S135–51.10.2337/dc20-S011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[91] Morales J, Schneider D. Hypoglycemia. Am J Med 2014; 127: S17–24.10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[92] Ligthelm RJ, Kaiser M, Vora J, Yale J-F. Insulin use in elderly adults: risk of hypoglycemia and strategies for care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60: 1564–70.10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04055.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[93] Bailey RA, Wang Y, Zhu V, Rupnow MFT. Chronic kidney disease in US adults with type 2 diabetes: an updated national estimate of prevalence based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) staging. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7: 415.10.1186/1756-0500-7-415Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[94] Lee AK, Lee CJ, Huang ES, Sharrett AR, Coresh J, Selvin E. Risk factors for severe hypoglycemia in black and white adults with diabetes: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 1661–7.10.2337/dc17-0819Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[95] Abdelhafiz AH, Koay L, Sinclair AJ. The effect of frailty should be considered in the management plan of older people with Type 2 diabetes. Future Sci OA 2016; 2: FSO102.10.4155/fsoa-2015-0016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[96] Lipska KJ, Yao X, Herrin J, Mccoy RG, Ross JS, Steinman MA, et al. Trends in drug utilization, glycemic control, and rates of severe hypoglycemia, 2006–2013. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 468–75.10.2337/dc16-0985Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[97] Schernthaner G, Ritz E, Schernthaner G-H. Strict glycaemic control in diabetic patients with CKD or ESRD: beneficial or deadly? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 2044–7.10.1093/ndt/gfq199Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[98] Arnold SV, Lipska KJ, Wang J, Seman L, Mehta SN, Kosiborod M. Use of intensive glycemic management in older adults with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66: 1190–4.10.1111/jgs.15335Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[99] Meneilly GS, Berard LD, Cheng AYY, Lin PJ, Maccallum L, Tsuyuki RT, et al. Insights into the current management of older adults with type 2 diabetes in the Ontario Primary Care setting. Can J Diabetes 2018; 42: 23–30.10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.03.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Weiner JZ, Gopalan A, Mishra P, Lipska KJ, Huang ES, Laiteerapong N, et al. Use and discontinuation of insulin treatment among adults aged 75 to 79 years with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179: 1633–41.10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3759Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[101] American Diabetes Association. 12. Older adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: S152–62.10.2337/dc20-S012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[102] Kirkman MS, Briscoe VJ, Clark N, Florez H, Haas LB, Halter JB, et al. Diabetes in older adults: a consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60: 2342–56.10.1111/jgs.12035Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[103] Abbatecola AM, Bo M, Barbagallo M, Incalzi RA, Pilotto A, Bellelli G, et al. Severe hypoglycemia is associated with antidiabetic oral treatment compared with insulin analogs in nursing home patients with type 2 diabetes and dementia: results from the DIMORA study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16: 349.e7–12.10.1016/j.jamda.2014.12.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[104] Abdelhafiz AH, Sinclair AJ. Deintensification of hypoglycaemic medications-use of a systematic review approach to highlight safety concerns in older people with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2018; 32: 444–50.10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.11.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[105] Sussman JB, Kerr EA, Saini SD, Holleman RG, Klamerus ML, Min LC, et al. Rates of deintensification of blood pressure and glycemic medication treatment based on levels of control and life expectancy in older patients with diabetes mellitus. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175: 1942–9.10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5110Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[106] Janka HU, Plewe G, Busch K. Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 182–8.10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01043.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[107] Mooradian AD, Bernbaum M, Albert SG. Narrative review: a rational approach to starting insulin therapy. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 125–34.10.7326/0003-4819-145-2-200607180-00010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[108] Leung E, Wongrakpanich S, Munshi MN. Diabetes management in the elderly. Diabetes Spectr 2018; 31: 245–53.10.2337/ds18-0033Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[109] Munshi MN, Pandya N, Umpierrez GE, Digenio A, Zhou R, Riddle MC. Contributions of basal and prandial hyperglycemia to total hyperglycemia in older and younger adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61: 535–41.10.1111/jgs.12167Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[110] Saudek CD, Hill Golden S. Feasibility and outcomes of insulin therapy in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus. Drugs Aging 1999; 14: 375–85.10.2165/00002512-199914050-00005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Yakaryilmaz FD, Ozturk ZA. Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly. World J Diabetes 2017; 8: 278–85.10.4239/wjd.v8.i6.278Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[112] Neumiller JJ, Setter SM. Pharmacologic management of the older patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2009; 7: 324–42.10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.12.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[113] Lapolla A, Dalfra MG, Fedele D. Insulin therapy in pregnancy complicated by diabetes: are insulin analogs a new tool? Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2005; 21: 241–52.10.1002/dmrr.551Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[114] Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, Mcphee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2477–86.10.1056/NEJMoa042973Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[115] Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1339–48.10.1056/NEJMoa0902430Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[116] Hokke SN, Armitage JA, Puelles VG, Short KM, Jones L, Smyth IM, et al. Altered ureteric branching morphogenesis and nephron endowment in offspring of diabetic and insulin-treated pregnancy. PLoS One 2013; 8: e58243.10.1371/journal.pone.0058243Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[117] Sacks DA. Gestational diabetes – whom do we treat? N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1396–8.10.1056/NEJMe0907617Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[118] Kelley KW, Carroll DG, Meyer A. A review of current treatment strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus. Drugs Context 2015; 4: 212282.10.7573/dic.212282Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[119] Liang H-L, Ma S-J, Xiao Y-N, Tan H-Z. Comparative efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin in treating gestational diabetes mellitus: An updated PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis. Medicine 2017; 96: e7939.10.1097/MD.0000000000007939Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[120] Nicholson W, Bolen S, Witkop CT, Neale D, Wilson L, Bass E. Benefits and risks of oral diabetes agents compared with insulin in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 193–205.10.1097/AOG.0b013e318190a459Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[121] Heller S. Weight gain during insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004; 65 Suppl 1: S23–7.10.1016/j.diabres.2004.07.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[122] Larger E, Rufat P, Dubois-Laforgue D, Ledoux S. Insulin and weight gain: myth or reality? Diabetes Metab 2001; 27: S23–7.Suche in Google Scholar

[123] Mcfarlane SI. Insulin therapy and type 2 diabetes: management of weight gain. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2009; 11: 601–7.10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00063.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[124] Garcia-Bournissen F, Feig DS, Koren G. Maternal-fetal transport of hypoglycaemic drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003; 42: 303–13.10.2165/00003088-200342040-00001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[125] Boskovic R, Feig DS, Derewlany L, Knie B, Portnoi G, Koren G. Transfer of insulin lispro across the human placenta: in vitro perfusion studies. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1390–4.10.2337/diacare.26.5.1390Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[126] Pollex EK, Feig DS, Lubetsky A, Yip PM, Koren G. Insulin glargine safety in pregnancy: a transplacental transfer study. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 29–33.10.2337/dc09-1045Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[127] Nachum Z, Zafran N, Salim R, Hissin N, Hasanein J, Gam Ze Letova Y, et al. Glyburide versus metformin and their combination for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Study. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 332–7.10.2337/dc16-2307Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[128] Balsells M, García-Patterson A, Solà I, Roqué M, Gich I, Corcoy R. Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015; 350: 102.10.1136/bmj.h102Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[129] American Diabetes Association. 14. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: S183–92.10.2337/dc20-S014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[130] Lawal SK, Adeniji AA, Sulaiman SO, Akajewole MM, Buhari MO, Osinubi AA. Comparative effects of glibenclamide, metformin and insulin on fetal pancreatic histology and maternal blood glucose in pregnant streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Afr Health Sci 2019; 19: 2491–504.10.4314/ahs.v19i3.25Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[131] Tarry-Adkins JL, Aiken CE, Ozanne SE. Neonatal, infant, and childhood growth following metformin versus insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2019; 16: e1002848.10.1371/journal.pmed.1002848Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[132] Nguyen L, Chan SY, Teo AKK. Metformin from mother to unborn child - Are there unwarranted effects? EBioMedicine 2018; 35: 394–404.10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.047Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[133] Mccance DR, Casey C. Type 1 diabetes in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2019; 48: 495–509.10.1016/j.ecl.2019.05.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[134] Kapur A, Mcintyre HD, Hod M. Type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2019; 48: 511–31.10.1016/j.ecl.2019.05.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[135] Balaji V, Balaji MS, Alexander C, Srinivasan A, Suganthi SR, Thiyagarajah A, et al. Premixed insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) versus premixed human insulin 30 (BHI 30) in gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized open-label controlled study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2012; 28: 529–32.10.3109/09513590.2011.650661Suche in Google Scholar

[136] Balaji V, Balaji MS, Alexander C, Ashalata S, Sheela Suganthi R, Suresh S, et al. Premixed insulin aspart 30 (Biasp 30) vs. premixed human insulin 30 (BHI 30) in gestational diabetes mellitus-a pilot study. J Assoc Physicians India 2010; 58: 99–101.Suche in Google Scholar

[137] Skajaa GO, Fuglsang J, Kampmann U, Ovesen PG. Parity increases insulin requirements in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 103: 2302–8.10.1210/jc.2018-00094Suche in Google Scholar

[138] Kampmann U, Knorr S, Fuglsang J, Ovesen P. Determinants of maternal insulin resistance during pregnancy: An Updated Overview. J Diabetes Res 2019; 2019: 5320156.10.1155/2019/5320156Suche in Google Scholar

[139] Ray S, Ghosh S. Insulin usage in pregnancy: present and future. London: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2017.10.5005/jp/books/13026_66Suche in Google Scholar

[140] Nielsen LR, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Thorsteinsson B, Johansen M, Damm P, Mathiesen ER. Hypoglycemia in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: predictors and role of metabolic control. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 9–14.10.2337/dc07-1066Suche in Google Scholar

[141] García-Patterson A, Gich I, Amini SB, Catalano PM, De Leiva A, Corcoy R. Insulin requirements throughout pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: three changes of direction. Diabetologia 2010; 53: 446–51.10.1007/s00125-009-1633-zSuche in Google Scholar

[142] Rosenn BM, Miodovnik M, Holcberg G, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA. Hypoglycemia: the price of intensive insulin therapy for pregnant women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 417–22.10.1016/0029-7844(94)00415-ASuche in Google Scholar

[143] Atkin SL, Lindow SW, Walton C, Masson EA. Recurrent hypoglycaemia associated with first and second trimester insulin sensitivity in a patient with insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabet Med 1996; 13: 589–91.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199606)13:6<589::AID-DIA106>3.0.CO;2-PSuche in Google Scholar

[144] Blumer I, Hadar E, Hadden DR, Jovanovič L, Mestman JH, Murad MH, et al. Diabetes and pregnancy: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 4227–49.10.1210/jc.2013-2465Suche in Google Scholar

[145] Herrera KM, Rosenn BM, Foroutan J, Bimson BE, Al Ibraheemi Z, Moshier EL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of insulin detemir versus NPH for the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 426.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.010Suche in Google Scholar

[146] Lambert K, Holt RIG. The use of insulin analogues in pregnancy. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013; 15: 888–900.10.1111/dom.12098Suche in Google Scholar

[147] Ji J, He Z, Yang Z, Mi Y, Guo N, Zhao H, et al. Comparing the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir versus neutral protamine hagedorn insulin in treatment of diabetes during pregnancy: a randomized, controlled study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020; 8: e001155.10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001155Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[148] Mathiesen ER, Hod M, Ivanisevic M, Duran Garcia S, Brøndsted L, Jovanovic L, et al. Maternal efficacy and safety outcomes in a randomized, controlled trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin in 310 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 2012–7.10.2337/dc11-2264Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[149] Vellanki P, Umpierrez G. Detemir is non-inferior to NPH insulin in women with pregestational type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus. Evid Based Med 2016; 21: 104–5.10.1136/ebmed-2015-110309Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[150] Mathiesen ER, Kinsley B, Amiel SA, Heller S, McCance D, Duran S, Bellaire S, Raben A. Maternal glycemic control and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic pregnancy: a randomized trial of insulin aspart versus human insulin in 322 pregnant women. Diabetes care 2007; 30: 771–6.10.2337/dc06-1887Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[151] Lv S, Wang J, Xu Y. Safety of insulin analogs during pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Arh Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 749–56.10.1007/s00404-015-3692-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[152] Anderson JH, Brunelle RL, Koivisto VA, Pfützner A, Trautmann ME, Vignati L, et al. Reduction of postprandial hyper-glycemia and frequency of hypoglycemia in IDDM patients on insulin-analog treatment. Multicenter Insulin Lispro Study Group. Diabetes 1997; 46: 265–70.10.2337/diab.46.2.265Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[153] Durnwald CP, Landon MB. A comparison of lispro and regular insulin for the management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 21: 309–13.10.1080/14767050802022797Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[154] Kitzmiller JL, Main E, Ward B, Theiss T, Peterson DL. Insulin lispro and the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 874–6.10.2337/diacare.22.5.874Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[155] Loukovaara S, Immonen I, Teramo KA, Kaaja R. Progression of retinopathy during pregnancy in type 1 diabetic women treated with insulin lispro. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1193–8.10.2337/diacare.26.4.1193Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-09-12
Accepted: 2022-02-20
Published Online: 2022-06-16

© 2021 Yan Liu et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Heruntergeladen am 22.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2478/dine-2022-0006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen