Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Conceptualizing Gender Performance in Higher Education: Exploring Regulation of Identity Expression

Published/Copyright: September 1, 2011
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

While many higher education scholars have considered gender (e.g., Dawson-Threat & Huba, 1996; DeLucia-Waack, Gerrity, Taub, & Baldo, 2001; Jacobs, 1995; Knox, Zusman, & Mcneely, 2004; Lackland & De Lisi, 2001; Massey & Christensen, 1990), most of the literature uses modernistic theories to examine gender roles or gendered differences among students. This has implications for researchers interested in deconstructing gender because modern theories may address issues of gendered inequality but maintain the gender binary (i.e., woman/man) as foundational. Butler’s (1990, 1993, 2004) postmodern theory of gender performativity seeks to disrupt the discourse surrounding gender, sex, and sexuality, in order to move beyond notions of foundational or universalized identities. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of Butler’s theory, focusing on the aspects necessary for understanding the regulation of gender and performance. In addition, a conceptualization of compulsory heterosexuality is included to bring further awareness to the intersections of gender, sex, and sexuality. The paper concludes with a focus on exploring areas of higher education and potential regulations on students' identity expression.

Published Online: 2011-9-1

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1940-7890.1083/html
Scroll to top button