Startseite Feminist Approaches to Tort Law Revisited - A Reply to Professor Schwartz
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Feminist Approaches to Tort Law Revisited - A Reply to Professor Schwartz

  • Assaf Jacob
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. Juli 2001
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

It takes courage to characterize feminist writings on tort law as "thin." Indeed, Professor Schwartz in his provocative and challenging article examines feminist writings in a unique and innovative way. In his analysis of a number of such writings, he attempts to demonstrate that they either have not done enough or could have done better. His provocative analysis of many issues invites vigorous discussion. One could write a separate comment on each and every one of the issues he raises; however, I will limit my comment to two: the tension between the "reasonable man" and the "reasonable woman" standard and the (no) duty to rescue rule. It takes courage to characterize feminist writings on tort law as "thin." Indeed, Professor Schwartz in his provocative and challenging article examines feminist writings in a unique and innovative way. In his analysis of a number of such writings, he attempts to demonstrate that they either have not done enough or could have done better. His provocative analysis of many issues invites vigorous discussion. One could write a separate comment on each and every one of the issues he raises; however, I will limit my comment to two: the tension between the "reasonable man" and the "reasonable woman" standard and the (no) duty to rescue rule.

Published Online: 2001-7-16

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 26.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1565-3404.1028/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen