Home The Law and Economics Analysis of Intellectual Property: Paradigmatic Shift From Incentives to Traditional Property
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Law and Economics Analysis of Intellectual Property: Paradigmatic Shift From Incentives to Traditional Property

  • Eli M. Salzberger
Published/Copyright: December 30, 2011
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper focuses on the normative analysis of intellectual property rights, in light of the technological revolution of the Internet and accompanying technologies. After a brief overview of the various philosophical justifications for awarding intellectual property rights, it identifies two major Law and Economics paradigms for the analysis of intellectual property: the incentives paradigm, which is founded upon the public goods analysis of neo-classical microeconomic theory, and the tragedy of the commons literature, which is based on the economic analysis of externalities. The paper raises several points of critique towards both frameworks of analysis and especially towards their inability to point to the desirable extent of intellectual property rights (IPR) and the direction of their reform required as the result of the recent technological revolution. It further criticizes the dominant contemporary Law and Economics writings in this field as shifting to a new proprietary paradigm that pre-assumes information to be an object of property, overlooking its fundamental differences from physical property and focusing on its management rather than on its initial justifications. The paper is concluded with some tentative thoughts on the general notion of “Property Rights” in light of the contemporary approach concerning intellectual property.

Published Online: 2011-12-30

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1555-5879.1545/pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoog4TRe_8xp1mmdf88tV9BLNr8dKMkLxtm72RlGvQnUIZplfREt
Scroll to top button