Home Social Sciences Perception and Reality in Congressional Earmarks
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Perception and Reality in Congressional Earmarks

  • Michael H Crespin , Charles J. Finocchiaro and Emily O Wanless
Published/Copyright: July 16, 2009
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Earmarks added to appropriations bills have generated a considerable amount of attention from the media, politicians, and fiscal watchdog groups. Taken as a whole, three “truths" about earmarks are frequently discussed: 1) earmarks are the reason for large budget deficits, 2) using omnibus legislation instead of regular order leads to more earmarks, and 3) “airdropped" earmarks added at the conference stage compound the problem of pork. In this paper, we examine these “truths" and find the conventional wisdom does not stand up to empirical tests. Finally, we show how Congress easily worked around new rules concerning the addition of earmarks at the conference stage.

Published Online: 2009-7-16

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1540-8884.1271/pdf
Scroll to top button