Is That a Bundle in Your Pocket, Or . . .?
-
Allison Hayward
As the 2008 Presidential campaign proceeds, calls for reform of bundling disclosure continue. Bundling permits individual funders to attract more attention from candidates by producing more funds than the contribution limit of $2,300 per election would permit. Advocates of greater regulation see bundling as an end-run around contribution limits and disclosure requirements of federal campaign finance law. Greater regulation of bundling could be the next step in the incremental but everlasting pursuit of political reform. Critics of bundling both inside and outside the Federal Election Commission (FEC) have called for additional regulations, especially in the disclosure of bundling. This essay looks at what bundling is and is not, what the law requires now, and why more regulation, even disclosure, may not be such a smart idea.
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- A Collapse of the Campaign Finance Regime?
- From Bad to Worse: The Unraveling of the Campaign Finance System
- Rethinking the Campaign Finance Agenda
- Decline and Fall? The Roberts Court and the Challenges to Campaign Finance Law
- Rolling in the Dough: The Continued Surge in Individual Contributions to Presidential Candidates and Party Committees
- Internet Fundraising in 2008: A New Model?
- Political Equality, the Internet, and Campaign Finance Regulation
- Financing the 2008 Congressional Elections: A Prospective Guide
- BCRA's Impact on the Political Expenditures of Corporate Interests
- The Interest Group Response to Campaign Finance Reform
- Finding the Cost of Campaign Advertising
- Is That a Bundle in Your Pocket, Or . . .?
- Whither Republican Women: The Growing Partisan Gap among Women in Congress
- Review
- Novak on Novak: A Review of Robert D. Novak's The Prince of Darkness: 50 Years Reporting in Washington
- Bridging Divides through Political Talk: Admirable Goal or Harmful Folly?
- Water Cooler Democracy: A Review of Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy by Diana C. Mutz
- Review of Richard Skinner's More than Money: Interest Group Action in Congressional Elections
- Review of Samples, The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform and La Raja, Small Change: Money, Political Parties, and Campaign Finance Reform
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- A Collapse of the Campaign Finance Regime?
- From Bad to Worse: The Unraveling of the Campaign Finance System
- Rethinking the Campaign Finance Agenda
- Decline and Fall? The Roberts Court and the Challenges to Campaign Finance Law
- Rolling in the Dough: The Continued Surge in Individual Contributions to Presidential Candidates and Party Committees
- Internet Fundraising in 2008: A New Model?
- Political Equality, the Internet, and Campaign Finance Regulation
- Financing the 2008 Congressional Elections: A Prospective Guide
- BCRA's Impact on the Political Expenditures of Corporate Interests
- The Interest Group Response to Campaign Finance Reform
- Finding the Cost of Campaign Advertising
- Is That a Bundle in Your Pocket, Or . . .?
- Whither Republican Women: The Growing Partisan Gap among Women in Congress
- Review
- Novak on Novak: A Review of Robert D. Novak's The Prince of Darkness: 50 Years Reporting in Washington
- Bridging Divides through Political Talk: Admirable Goal or Harmful Folly?
- Water Cooler Democracy: A Review of Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy by Diana C. Mutz
- Review of Richard Skinner's More than Money: Interest Group Action in Congressional Elections
- Review of Samples, The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform and La Raja, Small Change: Money, Political Parties, and Campaign Finance Reform
