Fragility in Disaster Response: Hurricane Katrina, 29 August 2005
-
Louise K. Comfort
Hurricane Katrina represented a major test of the policies and practice developed to protect the nation following the 9/11 attacks in 2001. The collapse of the emergency response system at all four levels of jurisdiction city, parish, state, and federal revealed serious flaws in governmental capacity to act in response to threat. This article examines the initial conditions and dynamic exchange among governmental agencies that led to the catastrophe in New Orleans. It concludes with a set of recommendations for improving the capacity of governmental jurisdictions to manage risk through coordinated action and to increase community resilience to disaster.
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Article
- Fragility in Disaster Response: Hurricane Katrina, 29 August 2005
- What Katrina Means for Emergency Management
- A Tale of Two Federal Emergency Management Agencies
- Scaring the Democrats: What's the Matter with Thomas Frank's Argument?
- Do 527's Add Up to a Party? Thinking About the "Shadows" of Politics
- Predictors of Interest Group Lobbying Decisions
- Review
- Speaking of Values: The Framing of American Politics
- Word Games: A Review Essay of Don't Think of an Elephant!
- Review of George Lakoff's Don't Think of an Elephant!
- Democrats' Lament, Lakoff's Cure
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Article
- Fragility in Disaster Response: Hurricane Katrina, 29 August 2005
- What Katrina Means for Emergency Management
- A Tale of Two Federal Emergency Management Agencies
- Scaring the Democrats: What's the Matter with Thomas Frank's Argument?
- Do 527's Add Up to a Party? Thinking About the "Shadows" of Politics
- Predictors of Interest Group Lobbying Decisions
- Review
- Speaking of Values: The Framing of American Politics
- Word Games: A Review Essay of Don't Think of an Elephant!
- Review of George Lakoff's Don't Think of an Elephant!
- Democrats' Lament, Lakoff's Cure