Startseite Sozialwissenschaften Primary Instability Paradox: The Ethics of Media Coverage in Presidential Nominations
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Primary Instability Paradox: The Ethics of Media Coverage in Presidential Nominations

  • Andrew R Cline
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Januar 2006
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
The Forum
Aus der Zeitschrift The Forum Band 3 Heft 4

This essay explores the ethics of how the press covers presidential nomination campaigns. It considers the implications of a predictive model that demonstrates how the nomination process limits voters' choices. Nominees may be predicted with a high degree of success before voting begins. Horse-race press coverage of the pre-primary period dramatically characterizes the process as unstable and up for grabs. By doing so, the press paradoxically contributes to the stability and, therefore, is complicit in limiting voter choice. The essay argues for telling the story of the impact of policy and governance on citizens’ lives.

Published Online: 2006-1-18

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1540-8884.1089/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen