Home Crustal melting: Deep, hot, and salty
Article Publicly Available

Crustal melting: Deep, hot, and salty

  • Hector M. Lamadrid ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Matthew Steele-MacInnis
Published/Copyright: August 4, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

The transformative nature of granulite-facies metamorphism, coupled with the subsequent upheaval of the rocks during exhumation, commonly obscures much of the geologic record of deep-crustal metasomatism and anatexis. Thus, the compositions of incipient melts in orogenic settings are generally unknown and are inferred based on petrologic experiments or thermodynamic models (Bartoli 2021). The melts are expected to be peraluminous and leucogranitic (Chapman et al. 2021), but the occurrence of strongly peraluminous granitoids of moderately mafic character, such as granodiorite, calls this into question (Zen 1988). Such intermediate, peraluminous granitoids have been interpreted as reflecting entrainment of either restitic or peritectic minerals in the ascending melt (Clemens and Stevens 2012; Chapman et al. 2021). Alternatively, such melts may have attained their more mafic character by melting at higher temperature (T) (Zen 1988). The latter interpretation is supported by experimental results (Patiño Douce and Johnston 1991) but so far lacks clear evidence in the rock record. Besides, dehydration melting of metapelites (e.g., by biotite breakdown) is expected to occur mostly within a restricted T interval (~800–850 °C), and the melts produced are wet enough to rapidly expend the H2O content of the protolith, limiting melt production at higher T (Makhluf et al. 2017). On the other hand, factors that reduce the activity of H2O, such as saline brines, may inhibit the onset of melting until higher T (Aranovich et al. 2013). But again, direct evidence in the rock record is generally lacking.

In this issue of American Mineralogist, Ferrero et al. (2021) describe exceptional evidence for high-T anatexis of metasediments through direct analyses of aliquots of incipient melt trapped in peritectic garnet. Ferrero et al. (2021) analyzed melt inclusions in garnet from felsic granulites of the Central Maine Terrane (CMT), previously described by Axler and Ague (2015). These inclusions provide a unique and compelling view of the compositions of melts produced during anatexis of metasediments at ultra-high T (UHT) >1000 °C, high pressures (HP) of >1.7 GPa, and likely in the presence of saline brines. The melt compositions are peraluminous, moderately enriched in MgO+FeO, and highly enriched in Cl+F. Hence, these results effectively represent a “missing link” in the origin and evolution of peraluminous melts and underscore the diversity of crustal melts produced in the bowels of orogens.

Ferrero et al. (2021) analyzed “nanogranitoid” melt inclusions trapped in peritectic garnet. In recent years, detailed microstructural studies have shown that such nanogranitoid inclusions can record many otherwise elusive properties of deep crustal melts (Bartoli et al. 2013). Such melt inclusions are challenging to study, owing to their small size and the fact that they require high confining P for laboratory homogenization (Bartoli et al. 2013). Nevertheless, such inclusions are the best available tools to characterize the properties of the trapped melts. The inclusions studied by Ferrero et al. (2021) were trapped in peritectic garnets from sillimanite-bearing gneisses of the CMT (Acadian orogeny, northeast U.S.A.) and previously reported by Axler and Ague (2015). Ferrero et al.’s (2021) results reveal several surprises and provide a remarkable view of anatexis under extreme conditions.

The first major finding by Ferrero et al. (2021) is that anatexis of these granulites occurred at significantly higher T and P than the previous estimates based on phase equilibria. Specifically, Ferrero et al. (2021) found that the inclusions melted at 1050 °C, and that a minimum confining pressure of 1.7 GPa was required to prevent decrepitation. Hence, the re-melting experiments attest to both HP and UHT conditions of at least ~1050 °C and ~1.7 GPa in the CMT.

Ferrero et al. (2021) next analyzed the compositions of the homogenized inclusions and documented an enriched mafic component of the incipient melts up to >5 wt% FeO+MgO. These values are well in excess of the average concentrations in both leucogranites and other nanogranitoid inclusions (both typically contain <2 wt% FeO+MgO; Bartoli et al. 2016) and are akin to melts produced during UHT (>1000 °C) melting of metapelites in laboratory experiments (Patiño Douce and Johnston 1991). The FeO+MgO concentrations of the melts reported by Ferrero et al. (2021) even approach the values of some peraluminous granodiorites. Thus, Ferrero et al. (2021) provide direct evidence for the production of FeO+MgO-enriched melts during HP/UHT anatexis—a process previously recognized only in experiments and not seen before in natural samples. Moreover, these results imply a significantly lower degree of polymerization—and hence, substantially lower melt viscosity—compared to previously reported, leucogranitic nanogranitoids. Hence, both UHT and relatively low degree of polymerization of the melts would likely promote efficient melt extraction.

Ferrero et al. (2021) also measured volatile concentrations (H2O, CO2, Cl, and F) in the homogenized inclusions. The H2O concentrations (~4 wt%) are in agreement with previous studies of melts produced during HP experiments (Makhluf et al. 2017), and the inclusions show very high CO2 contents up to 8000 ppm (~3000 ppm on average). These H2O-CO2 contents imply that the melts were fluid-undersaturated at trapping conditions, consistent with the absence of fluid inclusions in the studied garnets and with petrologic models for ascent and emplacement of “S-type” plutons (Zen 1988). Moreover, the exceptionally high CO2 contents of these inclusions, coupled with their modest concentrations of H2O, imply that these melts would eventually degas a CO2-rich fluid upon ascent and decompression, consistent with observations from mineralized greisen veins and pegmatites associated with peraluminous granitoids (Černý et al. 2005).

Perhaps the most intriguing result of Ferrero et al. (2021) is that these primary HP/UHT melts show very high concentrations of the halogens Cl and F—up to >1 wt% Cl+F, and in some cases approaching 1 wt% each of both Cl and F (!). These are exceptionally high values, about an order of magnitude greater than the average for most granitoids, and significant for several reasons. First, Ferrero et al. (2021) convincingly argue that these halogen contents imply melting in the presence of saline brine. For several decades, the presence, type, and role of fluids during granulite metamorphism and anatexis have been highly debated (Aranovich et al. 2013). The exceptional Cl concentrations of the melts reported by Ferrero et al. (2021) support the interpretation that chloride-rich brines played a role, inhibiting melting until UHT conditions were reached. The high F contents of the melts produced probably reflect a complementary process, in which the fluor-component of biotite was destabilized as a result of UHT, driving dehydration melting with anomalously high F. Hence, a key implication is that UHT conditions go hand-in-hand with Cl- and F-rich melts. Even more so than the high FeO+MgO contents noted above, these exceptional F contents would contribute to dramatically lower the viscosity of the incipient melt (Baker and Vaillancourt 1995), thus enhancing the potential for efficient extraction and ascent.

These results also have major implications for the genesis of magmatic-hydrothermal ores in orogenic settings. For example, the solubility of cassiterite (SnO2) in peraluminous, granitic melts increases substantially with increasing temperatures and concentrations of Cl and F in the melt (Bhalla et al. 2005). Moreover, when such melts reach fluid saturation, they degas F-rich hydrothermal fluids that form greisen veins (Černý et al. 2005). Partitioning of both Cl and F from the melt into an exsolved aqueous fluid is strongly enhanced by elevated Cl and F in the melt (Webster 1997). Hence, the results of Ferrero et al. (2021) help explain the ultimate origins of F-rich, ore-forming fluids.

References cited

Aranovich, L.Y., Newton, R.C., and Manning, C.E. (2013) Brine-assisted anatexis: Experimental melting in the system haplogranite-H2O-NaCl-KCl at deep-crustal conditions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 374, 111–120.10.1016/j.epsl.2013.05.027Search in Google Scholar

Axler, J.A., and Ague, J.J. (2015) Oriented multiphase needles in garnet from ultrahigh-temperature granulites, Connecticut, U.S.A. American Mineralogist, 100, 2254–2271.10.2138/am-2015-5018Search in Google Scholar

Baker, D.M., and Vaillancourt, J. (1995) The low viscosities of F + H2O-bearing granitic melts and implications for melt extraction and transport. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 132, 199–211.10.1016/0012-821X(95)00054-GSearch in Google Scholar

Bartoli, O. (2021) Granite geochemistry is not diagnostic of the role of water in the source. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 564, 116927.10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116927Search in Google Scholar

Bartoli, O., Acosta-Vigil, A., Ferrero, S., and Cesare, B. (2016) Granitoid magmas preserved as melt inclusions in high-grade metamorphic rocks. American Mineralogist, 101, 1543–1559.10.2138/am-2016-5541CCBYNCNDSearch in Google Scholar

Bartoli, O., Cesare, B., Poli, S., Bodnar, R. J., Acosta-Vigil, A., Frezzotti, M.L., and Meli, S. (2013) Recovering the composition of melt and the fluid regime at the onset of crustal anatexis and S-type granite formation. Geology, 41, 115–118.10.1130/G33455.1Search in Google Scholar

Bhalla, P., Holtz, F., Linnen, R.L., and Behrens, H. (2005) Solubility of cassiterite in evolved granitic melts: effect of T, fO2, and additional volatiles. Lithos, 80, 387–400.10.1016/j.lithos.2004.06.014Search in Google Scholar

Černý, P., Blevin, P.L., Cuney, M., and London, D. (2005) Granite-related ore deposits. In J.W. Hedenquist, J.F.H. Thompson, R.J. Goldfarb, and J.P. Richards, Eds., Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume, p. 337–370.10.5382/AV100.12Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, J.B., Runyon, S.E., Shields, J.E., Lawler, B.L., Pridmore, C.J., Scoggin, S.H., Swaim, N.T., Trzinski, A.E., Wiley, H.N., Barth, A.P., and Haxel, G.B. (2021) The North American Cordilleran Anatectic Belt. Earth-Science Reviews, 215, 103576.10.1130/abs/2021AM-364052Search in Google Scholar

Clemens, J.D., and Stevens, G. (2012) What controls chemical variation in granitic magmas? Lithos, 134-135, 317–329.10.1016/j.lithos.2012.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Ferrero, S., Ague, J.J., O’Brien, P.J., Wunder, B., Remusat, L., Ziemann, M.A., and Axler, J. (2021) High-pressure, halogen-bearing melt preserved in ultrahigh-temperature felsic granulites of the Central Maine Terrane, Connecticut (U.S.A.). American Mineralogist, 106, 1225–1236.10.2138/am-2021-7690Search in Google Scholar

Makhluf, A.R., Newton, R.C., and Manning, C.E. (2017) Experimental determination of liquidus H2O contents of haplogranite at deep-crustal conditions. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 172, 77.10.1007/s00410-017-1392-7Search in Google Scholar

Patiño Douce, A.E., and Johnston, A.D. (1991) Phase equilibria and melt productivity in the pelitic system: implications for the origin of peraluminous granitoids and aluminous granulites. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 107, 202–218.10.1007/BF00310707Search in Google Scholar

Webster, J.D. (1997) Exsolution of magmatic volatile phases from Cl-enriched mineralizing granitic magmas and implications for ore metal transport. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 61, 1017–1029.10.1016/S0016-7037(96)00395-XSearch in Google Scholar

Zen, E. (1988) Phase relations of peraluminous granitic rocks and their petrogenetic implications. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science, 16, 21–51.10.1146/annurev.ea.16.050188.000321Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-04-20
Accepted: 2021-04-21
Published Online: 2021-08-04
Published in Print: 2021-08-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Highlights and Breakthroughs
  2. Crustal melting: Deep, hot, and salty
  3. MSA Presidential Address
  4. Petrogenetic and tectonic interpretation of strongly peraluminous granitic rocks and their significance in the archean rock record
  5. Partial melting and P-T evolution of eclogite-facies metapelitic migmatites from the Egere terrane (Central Hoggar, South Algeria)
  6. High-pressure, halogen-bearing melt preserved in ultrahigh-temperature felsic granulites of the Central Maine Terrane, Connecticut (U.S.A.)
  7. Targeting mixtures of jarosite and clay minerals for Mars exploration
  8. Zirconolite from Larvik Plutonic Complex, Norway, its relationship to stefanweissite and nöggerathite, and contribution to the improvement of zirconolite end-member systematics
  9. Nanomineralogy of hydrothermal magnetite from Acropolis, South Australia: Genetic implications for iron-oxide copper gold mineralization
  10. Effect of magnesium on monohydrocalcite formation and unit-cell parameters
  11. Formation pathway of norsethite dominated by solution chemistry under ambient conditions
  12. A model for the kinetics of high-temperature reactions between polydisperse volcanic ash and SO2 gas
  13. Redox control and measurement in low-temperature (<450 °C) hydrothermal experiments
  14. Heat capacity and thermodynamic functions of partially dehydrated sodium and zinc zeolite A (LTA)
  15. P-V-T measurements of Fe3C to 117 GPa and 2100 K: Implications for stability of Fe3C phase at core conditions
  16. New Mineral Names
  17. Erratum
  18. Book Review
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2138/am-2022-8108/html
Scroll to top button