Homophily Exclusion or Homophily Preference? The Influence of the Executive Identity of Nonexecutive Directors on the Focal Firm Executive Pay and Ordinary Employee Pay

References

[1] Mcpherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27(1): 415–444.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Mcpherson J M, Smith-Lovin L. Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 1987, 52(3): 370–379.10.2307/2095356Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Bloom M, Michel J G. The relationships among organizational context, pay dispersion, and among managerial turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(1): 33–42.10.2307/3069283Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Pearce J L, Xu Q J. Rating performance or contesting status: Evidence against the homophily explanation for supervisor demographic skew in performance ratings. Organization Science, 2012, 23(2): 373–385.10.1287/orsc.1100.0585Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Hinkle S, Brown R. Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. Abrams D, Hogg M A. Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990: 28–47.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Umphress E E, Smith-Crowe K, Brief A P, et al. When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(2): 396–409.10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.396Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Ashforth B E, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(1): 20–39.10.5465/amr.1989.4278999Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Blader S L, Chen Y R. What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status. Organization Science, 2011, 22(4): 1040–1060.10.1287/orsc.1100.0558Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Sidanius J, Pratto F, Van Laar C, et al. Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 2004, 25(6): 845–880.10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.xSuche in Google Scholar

[10] Troyer L, Younts C W. Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first-and second-order expectations in determining social influence. American Journal of Sociology, 1997, 103(3): 692–732.10.1086/231253Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Blau P M. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press New York, 1977.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Piazza A, Castellucci F. Status in organization and management theory. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(1): 287–315.10.1177/0149206313498904Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Driskell J E, Salas E. Group decision making under stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76(3): 473–478.10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.473Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Kanekar S, Kolsawalla M B, Nazareth T. Occupational prestige as a function of occupant’s gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1989, 19(8): 681–688.10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00347.xSuche in Google Scholar

[15] Dikolli S, Mayew W, Nanda D. CEO tenure and the performance-turnover relation. Review of Accounting Studies, 2014, 19(1): 281–327.10.1007/s11142-013-9247-6Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Khanna V, Kim E H, Lu Y. CEO connectedness and corporate fraud. The Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(3): 1203–1252.10.1111/jofi.12243Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Flickinger M, Wrage M, Tuschke A, et al. How CEOs protect themselves against dismissal: A social status perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(6): 1107–1117.10.1002/smj.2382Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Finkelstein S. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(3): 505–538.10.2307/256485Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Lambert R A, Larcker D F, Weigelt K. The structure of organizational incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38(3): 438–461.10.2307/2393375Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Tosi Jr H L, Gomez-Mejia L R. The decoupling of CEO pay and performance: An agency theory perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989, 34(2): 169–189.10.2307/2989894Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Finkelstein S, Hambrick D C. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis/St. Paul: West, 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Kalyta P. Compensation transparency and managerial opportunism: A study of supplemental retirement plans. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30(4): 405–423.10.1002/smj.737Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Salancik G R, Pfeffer J. Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in US corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23(4): 653–664.10.5465/255554Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Sundaramurthy C. Corporate governance within the context of antitakeover provisions. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(5): 377–394.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199605)17:5<377::AID-SMJ816>3.0.CO;2-BSuche in Google Scholar

[25] Bakan D. The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Eagly A H. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Eagly A H, Karau S J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 2002, 109(3): 573–598.10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Rosen B, Jerdee T H. The influence of sex-role stereotypes on evaluations of male and female supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57(1): 44–48.10.1037/h0034198Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Schein V E. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57(2): 95–100.10.1037/h0037128Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Williams R J. Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 2003, 42(1): 1–10.10.1023/A:1021626024014Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Bear S, Rahman N, Post C. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 97(2): 207–221.10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Bernardi R A, Bosco S M, Vassill K M. Does female representation on boards of directors associate with Fortune’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” list? Business & Society, 2006, 45(2): 235–248.10.1177/0007650305283332Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Shore L M, Thornton Iii G C. Effects of gender on self-and supervisory ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29(1): 115–129.10.2307/255863Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Maddala G S. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.10.1017/CBO9780511810176Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Chizema A, Liu X, Lu J, et al. Politically connected boards and top executive pay in Chinese listed firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(6): 890–906.10.1002/smj.2253Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Firth M, Fung P M, Rui O M. Firm performance, governance structure, and top management turnover in a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 2006, 43(6): 1289–1330.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00621.xSuche in Google Scholar

[37] Pelled L H, Eisenhardt K M, Xin K R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(1): 1–28.10.2307/2667029Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Tsui A S, Ashford S J, Clair L S, et al. Dealing with discrepant expectations: Response strategies and managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(6): 1515–1543.10.2307/256842Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Adithipyangkul P, Alon I, Zhang T. Executive perks: Compensation and corporate performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2011, 28(2): 401–425.10.1007/s10490-009-9162-3Suche in Google Scholar