Synergistic role of microbiologically synthesized nanoparticles and PGPR in sustainable agriculture: a critical review
-
Priyvart Choudhary
, Nishesh Sharma , Vinay Kumar Pandey, Aum Garg
, Jerin James und Sarvesh Rustagi
Abstract
In recent years, agriculture has undergone transformative innovations to enhance crop productivity, resilience, and nutritional value. With increasing concerns over food security, environmental degradation, and soil health, there is growing emphasis on sustainable agricultural practices. Among these strategies, the use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have emerged as promising solutions. Advances in nanobiotechnology have led to the development of various metal-based nanoparticles (NPs), such as silver (Ag NPs), zinc oxide (ZnO NPs), titanium dioxide (TiO2 NPs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and quantum dots (QDs). These nanomaterials have the potential to enhance plant biomass and crop yield in both laboratory and field settings. PGPR have gained attention for their ability to improve crop productivity through mechanisms such as nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore and phytohormone production, and the induction of systemic resistance. The synergistic use of nanotechnology and PGPR represents a revolutionary platform for sustainable agriculture. This integrated approach offers practical solutions to critical agricultural challenges such as low productivity, soil degradation, and environmental sustainability. This review highlights how the combination of synergistic utilization of nanotechnology and PGPR can be developed as a winning strategy for sustainable agriculture to solve the current challenges of food security, soil degradation, and environmental sustainability.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: Not applicable.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest relating to the article.
-
Research funding: Not applicable.
-
Data availability: There is no data to be declared.
References
1. Gahoi, P, Omar, RA, Verma, N, Gupta, GS. Rhizobacteria and acylated homoserine lactone-based nanobiofertilizer to improve growth and pathogen defense in Cicer arietinum and Triticum aestivum plants. ACS Agric Sci Technol 2021;1:240–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00039.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Glaros, A, Luehr, G, Si, Z, Scott, S. Ecological civilization in practice: an exploratory study of urban agriculture in four Chinese cities. Land 2022;11:1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101628.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Subrahmanyam, G, Kumar, A, Sandilya, SP, Chutia, M, Yadav, AN. Diversity, plant growth promoting attributes, and agricultural applications of rhizospheric microbes. In: Plant Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020:1–52 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-38453-1_1Suche in Google Scholar
4. Das, A, Varma, A. Symbiosis: the art of living. In: Symbiotic Fungi: Principles and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:1–28 pp.10.1007/978-3-540-95894-9_1Suche in Google Scholar
5. Prasad, R, Bhattacharyya, A, Nguyen, QD. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges, and perspectives. Front Microbiol 2017;8:1014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01014. PubMed: 28676790.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Gupta, G, Parihar, SS, Ahirwar, NK, Snehi, SK, Singh, V. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J Microb Biochem Technol 2015;7:096–102.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Adesemoye, AO, Torbert, HA, Kloepper, JW. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol 2009;58:921–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y. PubMed: 19466478.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Saravanan, VS, Madhaiyan, M, Osborne, J, Thangaraju, M, Sa, TM. Ecological occurrence of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and nitrogen-fixing acetobacteraceae members: their possible role in plant growth promotion. Microb Ecol 2008;55:130–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9258-6. PubMed: 17574542.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Poveda, J, González-Andrés, F. Bacillus as a source of phytohormones for use in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2021;105:8629–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11492-8. PubMed: 34698898.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Jha, CK, Saraf, M. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review. J Agric Res Dev 2015;5:108–19.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Son, JS, Sumayo, M, Hwang, YJ, Kim, BS, Ghim, SY. Screening of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as elicitor of systemic resistance against gray leaf spot disease in pepper. Appl Soil Ecol 2014;73:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.07.016.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Ahanthem, S, Jha, DK. Response of rice crop inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to different soil nitrogen concentrations. Mycorrhiza News 2007;18:15–20.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Fatima, I, Hakim, S, Imran, A, Ahmad, N, Imtiaz, M, Ali, H, et al.. Exploring biocontrol and growth-promoting potential of multifaceted PGPR isolated from natural suppressive soil against the causal agent of chickpea wilt. Microbiol Res 2022;260:127015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127015. PubMed: 35447486.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Vurro, M, Miguel-Rojas, C, Pérez-de‐Luque, A Safe nanotechnologies for increasing the effectiveness of environmentally friendly natural agrochemicals. Pest Manag Sci 2019;75:2403–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5348. PubMed: 30672106.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Adeel, M, Shakoor, N, Ahmad, MA, White, JC, Jilani, G, Rui, Y. Bioavailability and toxicity of nanoscale/bulk rare Earth oxides in soil: physiological and ultrastructural alterations in Eisenia fetida. Environ Sci Nano 2021;8:1654–66. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EN00116G.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Abdollahdokht, D, Gao, Y, Faramarz, S, Poustforoosh, A, Abbasi, M, Asadikaram, G, et al.. Conventional agrochemicals towards nano-biopesticides: an overview on recent advances. Chem Biol Technol Agric 2022;9:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00281-0.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Mariyono, J, Kuntariningsih, A, Suswati, E, Kompas, T. Quantity and monetary value of agrochemical pollution from intensive farming in Indonesia. Manag Environ Qual Int J 2018;29:759–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0030.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Paulami, DAM, Paret, ML, Mondal, R, Mandal, AK. Advancement of noble metallic nanoparticles in agriculture: A promising future. Pedosphere 2023;33:116–28.10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.06.026Suche in Google Scholar
19. Rajput, VD, Singh, A, Minkina, T, Rawat, S, Mandzhieva, S, Sushkova, S, et al.. Nano-enabled products: challenges and opportunities for sustainable agriculture. Plants 2021;10:2727. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122727. PubMed: 34961197.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Zhao, F, Xin, X, Cao, Y, Su, D, Ji, P, Zhu, Z, et al.. Use of carbon nanoparticles to improve soil fertility, crop growth and nutrient uptake by corn (zea mays L.). Nanomaterials 2021;11:2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102717. PubMed: 34685156.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Dağhan, HATİCE. Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on maize (zea mays L.) growth, chlorophyll content and nutrient uptake. Appl Ecol Environ Res 2018;16.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Jakhar, AM, Aziz, I, Kaleri, AR, Hasnain, M, Haider, G, Ma, J, et al.. Nano-fertilizers: a sustainable technology for improving crop nutrition and food security. NanoImpact 2022;27:100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2022.100411. PubMed: 35803478.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Alsaeedi, A, El-Ramady, H, Alshaal, T, El-Garawany, M, Elhawat, N, Al-Otaibi, A. Silica nanoparticles boost growth and productivity of cucumber under water deficit and salinity stresses by balancing nutrients uptake. Plant Physiol Biochem 2019;139:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.008. PubMed: 30870715.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Ahmed, R, Uddin, MK, Quddus, MA, Samad, MYA, Hossain, MAM, Haque, ANA. Impact of foliar application of zinc and zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and quality of tomato. Hortic 2023;9:162. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020162.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Rai, M, Ingle, A. Role of nanotechnology in agriculture with special reference to management of insect pests. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012;94:287–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-3969-4. PubMed: 22388570.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Castillo-Henríquez, L, Alfaro-Aguilar, K, Ugalde-Álvarez, J, Vega-Fernández, L, Montes de Oca-Vásquez, G, Vega-Baudrit, JR. Green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles from plant extracts and their possible applications as antimicrobial agents in the agricultural area. Nanomaterials 2020;10:1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091763. PubMed: 32906575.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
27. Ntasiou, P, Kaldeli Kerou, A, Karamanidou, T, Vlachou, A, Tziros, GT, Tsouknidas, A, et al.. Synthesis and characterization of novel copper nanoparticles for the control of leaf spot and anthracnose diseases of olive. Nanomaterials 2021;11:1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071667. PubMed: 34202883.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
28. El-Saadony, MT, Abd El-Hack, ME, Taha, AE, Fouda, MMG, Ajarem, JS, N Maodaa, S, et al.. Ecofriendly synthesis and insecticidal application of copper nanoparticles against the storage Pest Tribolium castaneum. Nanomaterials 2020;10:587. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030587. PubMed: 32210153.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
29. Shende, S, Bhagat, R, Raut, R, Rai, M, Gade, A. Myco-fabrication of copper nanoparticles and its effect on crop pathogenic fungi. IEEE Trans NanoBioscience 2021;20:146–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2021.3056100. PubMed: 33523815.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
30. Jayaseelan, C, Rahuman, AA, Rajakumar, G, Vishnu Kirthi, A, Santhoshkumar, T, Marimuthu, S, et al.. Synthesis of pediculocidal and larvicidal silver nanoparticles by leaf extract from heartleaf moonseed plant, Tinospora cordifolia miers. Parasitol Res 2011;109:185–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2242-y. PubMed: 21212979.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Elamawi, RM, Al-Harbi, RE, Hendi, AA. Biosynthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using Trichoderma longibrachiatum and their effect on phytopathogenic fungi. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 2018;28:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-018-0028-1.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Wang, D, White, JC. Benefit of nano-enabled agrochemicals. Nat Food 2022;1.10.1038/s43016-022-00665-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Okey-Onyesolu, CF, Hassanisaadi, M, Bilal, M, Barani, M, Rahdar, A, Iqbal, J, et al.. Nanomaterials as nanofertilizers and nanopesticides: an overview. ChemistrySelect 2021;6:8645–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202102379.Suche in Google Scholar
34. Gusain, R, Gupta, K, Joshi, P, Khatri, OP. Adsorptive removal and photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants using metal oxides and their composites: a comprehensive review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2019;272:102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.102009. PubMed: 31445351.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
35. Ur Rahim, H, Qaswar, M, Uddin, M, Giannini, C, Herrera, ML, Rea, G. Nano-enable materials promoting sustainability and resilience in modern agriculture. Nanomaterials 2021;11:2068. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11082068. PubMed: 34443899.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
36. Borišev, I, Borišev, M, Jović, D, Župunski, M, Arsenov, D, Pajević, S, et al.. Nanotechnology and remediation of agrochemicals. In: Agrochemicals Detection, Treatment and Remediation. Boston, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2020:487–533 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-103017-2.00019-2Suche in Google Scholar
37. Sarma, H, Narayan, M, Peralta-Videa, JR, Lam, SS. Exploring the significance of nanomaterials and organic amendments—Prospect for phytoremediation of contaminated agroecosystem. Environ Pollut 2022;308:119601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119601. PubMed: 35709913.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
38. Chen, F, Aqeel, M, Maqsood, MF, Khalid, N, Irshad, MK, Ibrahim, M, et al.. Mitigation of lead toxicity in Vigna radiata genotypes by silver nanoparticles. Environ Pollut 2022;308:119606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119606. PubMed: 35716894.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
39. Hussain, F, Hadi, F, Akbar, F. Magnesium oxide nanoparticles and thidiazuron enhance lead phytoaccumulation and antioxidative response in Raphanus sativus L. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019;26:30333–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06206-7. PubMed: 31435910.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
40. Nauman Mahamood, MN, Zhu, S, Noman, A, Mahmood, A, Ashraf, S, Aqeel, M, et al.. An assessment of the efficacy of biochar and zero-valent iron nanoparticles in reducing lead toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ Pollut 2023;319:120979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120979. PubMed: 36586554.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
41. Oloumi, H, Mousavi, EA, Nejad, RM. Multi-wall carbon nanotubes effects on plant seedlings growth and cadmium/lead uptake in vitro. Russ J Plant Physiol 2018;65:260–8. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102144371802019X.Suche in Google Scholar
42. Akhtar, N, Ilyas, N, Meraj, TA, Pour-Aboughadareh, A, Sayyed, RZ, Mashwani, ZUR, et al.. Improvement of plant responses by nanobiofertilizer: a step towards sustainable agriculture. Nanomaterials 2022;12:965. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060965. PubMed: 35335778.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
43. Khan, ZS, Rizwan, M, Hafeez, M, Ali, S, Javed, MR, Adrees, M. The accumulation of cadmium in wheat (Triticum aestivum) as influenced by zinc oxide nanoparticles and soil moisture conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019;26:19859–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05333-5. PubMed: 31090010.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
44. Praveen, A, Khan, E, Ngiimei, DS, Perwez, M, Sardar, M, Gupta, M. Iron oxide nanoparticles as nano-adsorbents: a possible way to reduce arsenic phytotoxicity in Indian mustard plant (Brassica juncea L.). J Plant Growth Regul 2018;37:612–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-017-9760-0.Suche in Google Scholar
45. Liu, J, Li, J, Wolfe, K, Perrotta, B, Cobb, GP. Mobility of arsenic in the growth media of rice plants (Oryza sativa subsp. japonica. ‘koshihikari’) with exposure to copper oxide nanoparticles in a life-cycle greenhouse study. Sci Total Environ 2021;774:145620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145620.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
46. Khan, I, Raza, MA, Awan, SA, Shah, GA, Rizwan, M, Ali, B, et al.. Amelioration of salt induced toxicity in pearl millet by seed priming with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs): the oxidative damage, antioxidant enzymes and ions uptake are major determinants of salt tolerant capacity. Plant Physiol Biochem 2020;156:221–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.09.018. PubMed: 32979796.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
47. Emamverdian, A, Ding, Y, Barker, J, Liu, G, Hasanuzzaman, M, Li, Y, et al.. Co-application of 24-epibrassinolide and titanium oxide nanoparticles promotes Pleioblastus pygmaeus plant tolerance to Cu and Cd toxicity by increasing antioxidant activity and photosynthetic capacity and reducing heavy metal accumulation and translocation. Antioxidants 2022;11:451. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030451. PubMed: 35326101.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
48. Yue, L, Lian, F, Han, Y, Bao, Q, Wang, Z, Xing, B. The effect of biochar nanoparticles on rice plant growth and the uptake of heavy metals: implications for agronomic benefits and potential risk. Sci Total Environ 2019;656:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.364. PubMed: 30502737.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
49. Daryabeigi Zand, A, Tabrizi, AM, Heir, AV. The influence of association of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and zero-valent iron nanoparticles on removal of antimony from soil by trifolium repens. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2020;27:42815–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10252-x. PubMed: 32720026.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
50. Dasgupta, N, Ranjan, S, Ramalingam, C. Applications of nanotechnology in agriculture and water quality management. Environ Chem Lett 2017;15:591–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0648-9.Suche in Google Scholar
51. Xin, X, Judy, JD, Sumerlin, BB, He, Z. Nano-enabled agriculture: from nanoparticles to smart nanodelivery systems. Environ Chem 2020;17:413–25. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN19254.Suche in Google Scholar
52. Sharon, M, Choudhary, AK, Kumar, R. Nanotechnology in agricultural diseases and food safety. J Phytol 2010;2.Suche in Google Scholar
53. Hamida, RS, Ali, MA, Abdelmeguid, NE, Al-Zaban, MI, Baz, L, Bin-Meferij, MM. Lichens—A potential source for nanoparticles fabrication: a review on nanoparticles biosynthesis and their prospective applications. J Fungi 2021;7:291. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040291.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
54. Rodríguez, C, Briano, S, Leiva, E. Increased adsorption of heavy metal ions in multi-walled carbon nanotubes with improved dispersion stability. Molecules 2020;25:3106. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143106. PubMed: 32650371.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
55. Al-Saad, KA, Amr, MA, Hadi, DT, Arar, RS, Al-Sulaiti, MM, Abdulmalik, TA, et al.. Iron oxide nanoparticles: applicability for heavy metal removal from contaminated water. Arab J Nucl Sci Appl 2012;45:335–46.Suche in Google Scholar
56. Garg, R, Garg, R, Okon Eddy, N, Ibrahim Almohana, A, Fahad Almojil, S, Amir Khan, M, et al.. Biosynthesized silica-based zinc oxide nanocomposites for the sequestration of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. J King Saud Univ Sci 2022;34:101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101996.Suche in Google Scholar
57. Kaushal, M, Wani, SP. Nanosensors: frontiers in precision agriculture. Nanotechnology: An Agric Paradigm 2017:279–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4573-8-13.Suche in Google Scholar
58. Liu, B, Zhou, P, Liu, X, Sun, X, Li, H, Lin, M. Detection of pesticides in fruits by surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy coupled with gold nanostructures. Food Bioprocess Technol 2013;6:710–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0774-5.Suche in Google Scholar
59. Bao, J, Hou, C, Chen, M, Li, J, Huo, D, Yang, M, et al.. Plant esterase–chitosan/gold nanoparticles–graphene nanosheet composite-based biosensor for the ultrasensitive detection of organophosphate pesticides. J Agric Food Chem 2015;63:10319–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03971. PubMed: 26554573.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
60. Wang, H, Su, Y, Kim, H, Yong, D, Wang, L, Han, X. A highly efficient ZrO2 nanoparticle based electrochemical sensor for the detection of organophosphorus pesticides. Chin J Chem 2015;33:1135–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.201500460.Suche in Google Scholar
61. Hassani, S, Momtaz, S, Vakhshiteh, F, Maghsoudi, AS, Ganjali, MR, Norouzi, P, et al.. Biosensors and their applications in detection of organophosphorus pesticides in the environment. Arch Toxicol 2017;91:109–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1875-8. PubMed: 27761595.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
62. Shalini Devi, KS, Anusha, N, Raja, S, Senthil Kumar, A. A new strategy for direct electrochemical sensing of a organophosphorus pesticide, triazophos, using a coomassie brilliant-blue dye surface-confined carbon-black-nanoparticle-modified electrode. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2018;1:4110–19. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b00861.Suche in Google Scholar
63. Wang, X, Sun, W, Ma, X. Differential impacts of copper oxide nanoparticles and copper(II) ions on the uptake and accumulation of arsenic in rice (Oryza sativa). Environ Pollut 2019;252:967–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.052. PubMed: 31252135.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
64. Li, TJ, Wen, BY, Zhang, YJ, Zhang, L, Li, JF. Au@ ZrO2 core-shell nanoparticles as a surface-enhanced raman scattering substrate for organophosphorus compounds detection. J Raman Spectrosc 2022;53:1386–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.6373.Suche in Google Scholar
65. Safdar, M, Kim, W, Park, S, Gwon, Y, Kim, YO, Kim, J. Engineering plants with carbon nanotubes: a sustainable agriculture approach. J Nanobiotechnol 2022;20:275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01483-w. PubMed: 35701848.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
66. Alahdal, FAM, Qashqoosh, MTA, Manea, YK, Salem, MAS, Khan, AMT, Naqvi, S. Eco-friendly synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles as nanosensor, nanocatalyst and antioxidant agent using leaf extract of P. austroarabica. Open 2022;8:100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onano.2022.100067.Suche in Google Scholar
67. Afsharinejad, A, Davy, A, Jennings, B, Brennan, C. Performance analysis of plant monitoring nanosensor networks at THz frequencies. IEEE Internet Things J 2015;3:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2463685.Suche in Google Scholar
68. Giraldo, JP, Wu, H, Newkirk, GM, Kruss, S. Nanobiotechnology approaches for engineering smart plant sensors. Nat Nanotechnol 2019;14:541–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0470-6. PubMed: 31168083.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
69. Manjunatha, SB, Biradar, DP, Aladakatti, YR. Nanotechnology and its applications in agriculture: a review. J Farm Sci 2016;29:1–13.Suche in Google Scholar
70. Kashyap, PL, Kumar, S, Srivastava, AK. Nanodiagnostics for plant pathogens. Environ Chem Lett 2017;15:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-016-0580-4.Suche in Google Scholar
71. Sonu, V, Chaudhary, V. A paradigm of internet-of-nano-things inspired intelligent plant pathogen-diagnostic biosensors. ECS Sens Plus 2022;1:031401. https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/ac92ed.Suche in Google Scholar
72. Kashyap, PL, Rai, P, Sharma, S, Chakdar, H, Kumar, S, Pandiyan, K, et al.. Nanotechnology for the detection and diagnosis of plant pathogens. Nanosci Food Agric 2016;2:253–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39306-3-8.Suche in Google Scholar
73. Fazeli-Nasab, B, Sayyed, RZ, Piri, R, Rahmani, AF. Biopriming and nanopriming: green revolution wings to increase plant yield, growth, and development under stress condition and forward dimensions. Antioxid Plant-Microbe Interact 2021:623–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1350-0-29.Suche in Google Scholar
74. Abbasi Khalaki, M, Moameri, M, Asgari Lajayer, B, Astatkie, T. Influence of nano-priming on seed germination and plant growth of forage and medicinal plants. Plant Growth Regul 2021;93:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-020-00670-9.Suche in Google Scholar
75. Mahakham, W, Sarmah, AK, Maensiri, S, Theerakulpisut, P. Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Sci Rep 2017;7:8263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08669-5. PubMed: 28811584.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
76. Vurukonda, SSKP, Vardharajula, S, Shrivastava, M, SkZ, A. Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 2016;184:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003. PubMed: 26856449.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
77. Shelar, A, Nile, SH, Singh, AV, Rothenstein, D, Bill, J, Xiao, J, et al.. Recent advances in nano-enabled seed treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture: challenges, risk assessment, and future perspectives. Nano-Micro Lett 2023;15:54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01025-5. PubMed: 36795339.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
78. Acharya, P. Seed Priming with Green Synthesized Nanoparticles Improve Germination, Growth, and Yield While Maintaining Quality of Onion and Watermelon [Doctoral Dissertation].2020.Suche in Google Scholar
79. Liang, L, Wong, SC, Lisak, G. Effects of plastic-derived carbon dots on germination and growth of pea (pisum sativum) via seed nano-priming. Chemosphere 2023;316:137868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137868. PubMed: 36642132.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
80. Cembrowska-Lech, D, Rybak, K. Nanopriming of barley seeds—A shotgun approach to improve germination under salt stress conditions by regulating of reactive oxygen species. Plants 2023;12:405. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020405. PubMed: 36679118.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
81. Pereira, AES, Silva, PM, Oliveira, JL, Oliveira, HC, Fraceto, LF. Chitosan nanoparticles as carrier systems for the plant growth hormone gibberellic acid. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2017;150:141–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.11.027. PubMed: 27914250.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
82. Adhikari, K, Mahato, GR, Chen, H, Sharma, HC, Chandel, AK, Gao, B. Nanoparticles and their impacts on seed germination. In: Plant Responses to Nanomaterials: Recent Interventions, and Physiological and Biochemical Responses. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021:21–31 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-36740-4_2Suche in Google Scholar
83. Gilbertson, LM, Pourzahedi, L, Laughton, S, Gao, X, Zimmerman, JB, Theis, TL, et al.. Guiding the design space for nanotechnology to advance sustainable crop production. Nat Nanotechnol 2020;15:801–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0706-5. PubMed: 32572231.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
84. Yaseen, R, Ahmed, IS, A, Omer, M, A, Agha, KM, M, Emam, M& T. Nano-fertilizers: bio-Fabrication, application and biosafety. Nov Res Microbiol J 2020;4:884–900. https://doi.org/10.21608/nrmj.2020.107540.Suche in Google Scholar
85. Ferrusquía-Jiménez, NI, González-Arias, B, Rosales, A, Esquivel, K, Escamilla-Silva, EM, Ortega-Torres, AE, et al.. Elicitation of bacillus cereus-Amazcala (Bc-A) with SiO2 nanoparticles improves its role as a plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) in chili pepper plants. Plants 2022;11:3445. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243445. PubMed: 36559556.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
86. Hafez, EM, Osman, HS, Gowayed, SM, Okasha, SA, Omara, AED, Sami, R, et al.. Minimizing the adversely impacts of water deficit and soil salinity on maize growth and productivity in response to the application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and silica nanoparticles. Agronomy 2021;11:676. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040676.Suche in Google Scholar
87. Alharbi, K, Rashwan, E, Mohamed, HH, Awadalla, A, Omara, AED, Hafez, EM, et al.. Application of silica nanoparticles in combination with two bacterial strains improves the growth, antioxidant capacity and production of barley irrigated with saline water in salt-affected soil. Plants 2022;11:2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11152026. PubMed: 35956503.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
88. Moradipour, M, Saberi-Riseh, R, Mohammadinejad, R, Hosseini, A. Nano-encapsulation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their metabolites using alginate-silica nanoparticles and carbon nanotube improves ucb1 pistachio micropropagation. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2019;29:1096–103. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1903.03022.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
89. Merinero, M, Alcudia, A, Begines, B, Martínez, G, Martín-Valero, MJ, Pérez-Romero, JA, et al.. Assessing the biofortification of wheat plants by combining a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) and polymeric Fe-nanoparticles: allies or enemies? Agronomy 2022;12:228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010228.Suche in Google Scholar
90. Ahmed, T, Noman, M, Rizwan, M, Ali, S, Ijaz, U, Nazir, MM, et al.. Green molybdenum nanoparticles-mediated bio-stimulation of bacillus sp. strain ZH16 improved the wheat growth by managing in planta nutrients supply, ionic homeostasis and arsenic accumulation. J Hazard Mater 2022;423:127024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127024. PubMed: 34481401.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
91. Mardalipour, M, Zahedi, H, Sharghi, Y. Evaluation of nano biofertilizer efficiency on agronomic traits of spring wheat at different sowing date. Biol Forum 6 2014;2:349.Suche in Google Scholar
92. Mary Isabella Sonali, JMI, Kavitha, R, Kumar, PS, Rajagopal, R, Gayathri, KV, Ghfar, AA, et al.. Application of a novel nanocomposite containing micro-nutrient solubilizing bacterial strains and CeO2 nanocomposite as bio-fertilizer. Chemosphere 2022;286:131800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131800. PubMed: 34399258.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
93. Khati, P, Chaudhary, P, Gangola, S, Bhatt, P, Sharma, A. Nanochitosan supports growth of zea mays and also maintains soil health following growth. 3 Biotech 2017;7:81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0668-y. PubMed: 28500403.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
94. Panichikkal, J, Mohanan, DP, Koramkulam, S, Krishnankutty, RE. Chitosan nanoparticles augmented indole-3-acetic acid production by rhizospheric Pseudomonas monteilii. J Basic Microbiol 2022;62:1467–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202100358. PubMed: 35510957.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
95. Panichikkal, J, Thomas, R, John, JC, Radhakrishnan, EK. Biogenic gold nanoparticle supplementation to plant beneficial Pseudomonas monteilii was found to enhance its plant probiotic effect. Curr Microbiol 2019;76:503–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01649-0. PubMed: 30805698.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
96. Hosseinpour, A, Haliloglu, K, Tolga Cinisli, K, Ozkan, G, Ozturk, HI, Pour-Aboughadareh, A, et al.. Application of zinc oxide nanoparticles and plant growth promoting bacteria reduces genetic impairment under salt stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. “linda”). Agriculture 2020;10:521. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110521.Suche in Google Scholar
97. Singh, NP, Gupta, VK, Singh, AP. Graphene and carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy nanocomposites: a review. Polymer 2019;180:121724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.121724.Suche in Google Scholar
98. Sharafzadeh, S. Effects of PGPR on growth and nutrients uptake of tomato. Int J Adv Eng Technol 2012;2:27.Suche in Google Scholar
99. Gruyer, N, Dorais, M, Bastien, C, Dassylva, N, Triffault-Bouchet, G. Interaction between silver nanoparticles and plant growth. Acta Hortic Int Symp N Technol Environ Control Energy Sav Crop Prod Greenh Plant 1037 2014:795–800. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2014.1037.105.Suche in Google Scholar
100. Khan, S, Akhtar, N, Rehman, SU, Shujah, S, Rha, ES, Jamil, M. Biosynthesized iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) mitigate arsenic toxicity in rice seedlings. Toxics 2020;9:2. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9010002. PubMed: 33396194.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
101. Nawaz, S, Bano, A. Effects of PGPR (pseudomonas sp.) and Ag-nanoparticles on enzymatic activity and physiology of cucumber. Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric 2020;11:124–36. https://doi.org/10.2174/2212798410666190716162340. PubMed: 31322080.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
102. Kumar, P, Pahal, V, Gupta, A, Vadhan, R, Chandra, H, Dubey, RC. Effect of silver nanoparticles and bacillus cereus LPR2 on the growth of zea mays. Sci Rep 2020;10:20409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77460-w. PubMed: 33230192.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
103. Khan, N, Bano, A. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and Ag-nano particle in the bioremediation of heavy metals and maize growth under municipal wastewater irrigation. Int J Phytoremediation 2016;18:211–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1064352. PubMed: 26507686.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
104. Lyu, S, Wei, X, Chen, J, Wang, C, Wang, X, Pan, D. Titanium as a beneficial element for crop production. Front Plant Sci 2017;8:597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00597. PubMed: 28487709.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
105. Sardar, R, Ahmed, S, Yasin, NA. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles mitigate cadmium toxicity in Coriandrum sativum L. through modulating antioxidant system, stress markers and reducing cadmium uptake. Environ Pollut 2022;292:118373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118373. PubMed: 34662592.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
106. Timmusk, S, Seisenbaeva, G, Behers, L. Titania (TiO2) nanoparticles enhance the performance of growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Sci Rep 2018;8:617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18939-x. PubMed: 29330479.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
107. Zand, AD, Mikaeili Tabrizi, A, Vaezi Heir, A. Application of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to promote phytoremediation of Cd-polluted soil: contribution of PGPR inoculation. Biorem J 2020;24:171–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2020.1799929.Suche in Google Scholar
108. Saberi-Rise, R, Moradi-Pour, M. The effect of Bacillus subtilis Vru1 encapsulated in alginate–bentonite coating enriched with titanium nanoparticles against Rhizoctonia solani on bean. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;152:1089–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.197. PubMed: 31751702.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
109. Azmat, A, Tanveer, Y, Yasmin, H, Hassan, MN, Shahzad, A, Reddy, M, et al.. Coactive role of zinc oxide nanoparticles and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for mitigation of synchronized effects of heat and drought stress in wheat plants. Chemosphere 2022;297:133982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133982. PubMed: 35181419.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
110. Yasmin, H, Mazher, J, Azmat, A, Nosheen, A, Naz, R, Hassan, MN, et al.. Combined application of zinc oxide nanoparticles and biofertilizer to induce salt resistance in safflower by regulating ion homeostasis and antioxidant defence responses. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2021;218:112262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112262. PubMed: 33964549.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
111. Ahmad Wani, P, Khan, MS, Zaidi, A. Impact of zinc-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on lentil grown in zinc-amended soil. Agron Sustain Dev 2008;28:449–55. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro-2007048.Suche in Google Scholar
112. Seyed, SR & Khoramdel, S. Effects of Nano-zinc Oxide and Seed Inoculation by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (pgpr) on Yield, Yield Components and Grain Filling Period of Soybean (Glycine max l.). 2016.Suche in Google Scholar
113. Tanveer, Y, Yasmin, H, Nosheen, A, Ali, S, Ahmad, A. Ameliorative effects of plant growth promoting bacteria, zinc oxide nanoparticles and oxalic acid on Luffa acutangula grown on arsenic enriched soil. Environ Pollut 2022;300:118889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118889. PubMed: 35085652.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
114. Muhammad, F, Raza, MAS, Iqbal, R, Zulfiqar, F, Aslam, MU, Yong, JWH, et al.. Ameliorating drought effects in wheat using an exclusive or co-applied rhizobacteria and ZnO nanoparticles. Biology 2022;11:1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111564. PubMed: 36358265.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
115. Sajjad Mirza, M, Ahmad, W, Latif, F, Haurat, J, Bally, R, Normand, P, et al.. Isolation, partial characterization, and the effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on micro-propagated sugarcane in vitro. Plant Soil 2001;237:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/a-1013388619231.Suche in Google Scholar
116. Majeed, A, Abbasi, MK, Hameed, S, Imran, A, Rahim, N. Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from wheat rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion. Front Microbiol 2015;6:198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00198. PubMed: 25852661.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
117. Egamberdiyeva, D. The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Appl Soil Ecol 2007;36:184–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.02.005.Suche in Google Scholar
118. Ibiene, AA, Agogbua, JU, Okonko, IO, Nwachi, GN. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as biofertilizer: effect on growth of lycopersicum esculentus. Jounal Am Sci 2012;8:318–24.Suche in Google Scholar
119. Romero-Perdomo, F, Abril, J, Camelo, M, Moreno-Galván, A, Pastrana, I, Rojas-Tapias, D, et al.. Azotobacter chroococcum as a potentially useful bacterial biofertilizer for cotton (gossypium Hirsutum): effect in reducing N fertilization. Rev Argent Microbiol 2017;49:377–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2017.04.006. PubMed: 28864227.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
120. Widawati, S, Suliasih. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on germination and seedling growth of Sorghum bicolor L. moench. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2018;166:012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/166/1/012022.Suche in Google Scholar
121. Agri, U, Chaudhary, P, Sharma, A. In vitro compatibility evaluation of agriusable nanochitosan on beneficial plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and maize plant. Natl Acad Sci Lett 2021;44:555–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-021-01047-w.Suche in Google Scholar
122. Akhtar, N, Khan, S, Rehman, SU, Rehman, ZU, Khatoon, A, Rha, ES, et al.. Synergistic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles and bacteria reduce heavy metals toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant. Toxics 2021;9:113. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9050113. PubMed: 34065355.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
123. El-Sawah, AM, El-Keblawy, A, Ali, DFI, Ibrahim, HM, El-Sheikh, MA, Sharma, A, et al.. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance soil key enzymes, plant growth, seed yield, and qualitative attributes of guar. Agriculture 2021;11:194. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030194.Suche in Google Scholar
124. Moncada, A, Miceli, A, Vetrano, F. Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and organic fertilization for soilless cultivation of basil. Sci Hortic 2021;275:109733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109733.Suche in Google Scholar
125. Ndaba, B, Roopnarain, A, Rama, H, Maaza, M. Biosynthesized metallic nanoparticles as fertilizers: an emerging precision agriculture strategy. J Integr Agric 2022;21:1225–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119-21-63751-6.Suche in Google Scholar
126. Nisar, P, Ali, N, Rahman, L, Ali, M, Shinwari, ZK. Antimicrobial activities of biologically synthesized metal nanoparticles: an insight into the mechanism of action. J Biol Inorg Chem 2019;24:929–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-019-01717-7. PubMed: 31515623.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
127. Hashem, AH, Abdelaziz, AM, Askar, AA, Fouda, HM, Khalil, AMA, Abd-Elsalam, KA, et al.. Bacillus megaterium-mediated synthesis of selenium nanoparticles and their antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani in faba bean plants. J Fungi 2021;7:195. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030195. PubMed: 33803321.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
128. Ahmed, T, Wu, Z, Jiang, H, Luo, J, Noman, M, Shahid, M, et al.. Bioinspired green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles from a native bacillus cereus strain RNT6: characterization and antibacterial activity against rice panicle blight pathogens Burkholderia glumae and B. gladioli. Nanomaterials 2021;11:884. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11040884.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
129. Ahmed, T, Shahid, M, Noman, M, Niazi, MBK, Mahmood, F, Manzoor, I, et al.. Silver nanoparticles synthesized by using bacillus cereus SZT1 ameliorated the damage of bacterial leaf blight pathogen in rice. Pathogens 2020;9:160. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9030160. PubMed: 32110981.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
130. Sabir, S, Zahoor, MA, Waseem, M, Siddique, MH, Shafique, M, Imran, M, et al.. Biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using bacillus subtilis: characterization and nutritive significance for promoting plant growth in zea mays L. Dose Response 2020;18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820958911. PubMed: 32973419.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
131. Sayed, AMM, Kim, S, Behle, RW. Characterisation of silver nanoparticles synthesised by Bacillus thuringiensis as a nanobiopesticide for insect Pest control. Biocontrol Sci Technol 2017;27:1308–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2017.1397597.Suche in Google Scholar
132. Tarafdar, JC, Rathore, I. Microbial synthesis of nanoparticles for use in agriculture ecosystem. In: Microbes for plant stress management. Delhi: New India Publishing Agency; 2016:105–18 pp.Suche in Google Scholar
133. Zulfiqar, F, Navarro, M, Ashraf, M, Akram, NA, Munné-Bosch, S. Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture: advantages and limitations. Plant Sci 2019;289:110270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110270. PubMed: 31623775.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
134. Bahrulolum, H, Nooraei, S, Javanshir, N, Tarrahimofrad, H, Mirbagheri, VS, Easton, AJ, et al.. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using microorganisms and their application in the agrifood sector. J Nanobiotechnol 2021;19:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-00834-3. PubMed: 33771172.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
135. Azeez, L, Lateef, A, Wahab, AA, Adejumo, AL, Raji, K. Comparative effects of silver nanoparticles, sucrose and sodium chloride as osmotic solutions for tomato slices: antioxidant activity, microbial quality and modelling with polynomial regression model. S Afr J Chem 2019;72:21–31. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2019/v72a4.Suche in Google Scholar
136. Almutairi, ZM. Effect of nano-silicon application on the expression of salt tolerance genes in germinating tomato (“solanum lycopersicum”L.) seedlings under salt stress. Plant Omics 2016;9:106–14.Suche in Google Scholar
137. Mustafa, G, Sakata, K, Komatsu, S. Proteomic analysis of soybean root exposed to varying sizes of silver nanoparticles under flooding stress. J Proteonomics 2016;148:113–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.07.027. PubMed: 27469891.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
138. Linh, TM, Mai, NC, Hoe, PT, Lien, LQ, Ban, NK, Hien, LTT, et al.. Metal-based nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in soybean. J Nanomater 2020;2020:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4056563.Suche in Google Scholar
139. Fu, L, Su, T, Wei, D, Wu, D, Zhang, G, Shen, Q. Copper oxide nanoparticles alleviate cadmium toxicity in cereal crops. Environ Sci Nano 2022;9:3502–13. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EN00213B.Suche in Google Scholar
140. Raeisi Sadati, SY, Jahanbakhsh Godehkahriz, S, Ebadi, A, Sedghi, M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in wheat via physio-biochemical changes and stress genes expression. Iran J Biotechnol 2022;20:e3027. https://doi.org/10.30498/ijb.2021.280711.3027. PubMed: 35891959.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
141. Al-Khayri, JM, Rashmi, R, Surya Ulhas, R, Sudheer, WN, Banadka, A, Nagella, P, et al.. The role of nanoparticles in response of plants to abiotic stress at physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels. Plants 2023;12:292. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020292. PubMed: 36679005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
142. Ma, Y, Yao, L, Jiao, Y, Yang, Y, Kim, D, Wang, H. Effects of silver nanoparticles on plant growth and soil microbial community. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2016;23:21206–18.Suche in Google Scholar
143. Tripathi, DK, Singh, S, Singh, S, Mishra, S, Singh, VP, Singh, S, et al.. Nitric oxide alleviates silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)-induced phytotoxicity in pisum sativum (L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 2017;118:571–83.10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
144. Sharma, P, Bhatt, D, Zaidi, MG, Saradhi, PP. Synthesis and applications of nanoparticles in agriculture: a review. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2018;18:5077–98.Suche in Google Scholar
145. Kalwani, M, Chakdar, H, Srivastava, A, Pabbi, S, Shukla, P. Effects of nanofertilizers on soil and plant-associated microbial communities: emerging trends and perspectives. Chemosphere 2022;287:132107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132107. PubMed: 34492409.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston