Startseite Comparison of lignocellulosic enzymes and CAZymes between ascomycetes (Trichoderma) and basidiomycetes (Ganoderma) species: a proteomic approach
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Comparison of lignocellulosic enzymes and CAZymes between ascomycetes (Trichoderma) and basidiomycetes (Ganoderma) species: a proteomic approach

  • Akshay Shankar ORCID logo , Kavish Kumar Jain , Ramesh Chander Kuhad und Krishna Kant Sharma ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Dezember 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Wood decomposing ascomycetes and basidiomycetes group of fungi are the most valuable microbes on the earth’s ecosystem that recycles the source of carbon; therefore, they are essential for the biorefinery industries. To understand the robustness of the enzymes and their metabolic pathways in the fungal system, label-free quantification of the total proteins was performed. The fungi showed a comparable quantity of protein abundance [Trichoderma citrinoviride (285), Thermoascus aurantiacus (206), Ganoderma lucidum MDU-7 (102), G. lucidum (242)]. Differentially regulated proteins of ascomycetes and basidiomycetes were analyzed, and their heatmap shows upregulated and downregulated proteins [25 differentially expressed proteins in T. citrinoviride (8.62 % up-regulated and 91.37 % down-regulated) and G. lucidum (5.74 % up-regulated and 94.25 % down-regulated)] by using the normalized peptide-spectrum match (PSMs) and log2fold change. These proteins were similarly matched to the carbohydrate active enzymes family (CAZymes) like glycoside hydrolase (GH family), carbohydrate-binding module (CBM family) with auxiliary activities, and also involved in the hydrolysis of carbohydrate, lignin, xylan, polysaccharides, peptides, and oxido-reductase activity that helps in antioxidant defense mechanism. The lignocellulolytic enzymes from two different divisions of fungi and proteomics studies gave a better understanding of carbon recycling and multi-product lignocellulosic biorefinery processes.


Corresponding author: Krishna Kant Sharma, Laboratory of Enzymology and Recombinant DNA Technology, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India, E-mail:

Funding source: Department of Science and Technology, India

Award Identifier / Grant number: 1196SR/FST/LS-I/2017/4

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the infrastructural support from the DST-FIST grant (Grant No. 1196SR/FST/LS-I/2017/4). Sincere thanks to Mr. Sonu and Mr. Pratik Shinde for their support and their valuable suggestions throughout the work. Also, thanks to Mr. Shubham, CIF, UDSC, New Delhi, for his help in proteomic analysis.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: Akshay Shankar: Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Software; Validation; Visualization; Writing – original draft. Kavish Kumar Jain: Data curation, Investigation, Investigation, Analysis. Ramesh Chander Kuhad: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Project administration; Resources; Supervision; Validation; Visualization Krishna Kant Sharma: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Project administration; Resources; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Writing – review & editing.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no competing interests.

  4. Research funding: Authors are also thankful to DST for FIST grant sanctioned to the Department of Microbiology, M. D. University, Rohtak. We wish to acknowledge SERB, DST, India (File no. PDF/2016/001068) for a contingency grant.

  5. Data availability: Protein data were deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (www.proteomexchange.org/submission/index.html) through the PRoteomics IDEntification Database (PRIDE; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/) repository with the dataset identifier PXD033434.

References

1. Sun, J, Zhang, L, Loh, KC. Review and perspectives of enhanced volatile fatty acids production from acidogenic fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass wastes. Bioresour Bioprocess 2021;8:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00420-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Shankar, A, Saini, S, Sharma, KK. Fungal-integrated second-generation lignocellulosic biorefinery: utilization of agricultural biomass for co-production of lignocellulolytic enzymes, mushroom, fungal polysaccharides, and bioethanol. Biomass Convers Biorefin 2022;1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02969-1.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Saini, S, Chutani, P, Kumar, P, Sharma, KK. Development of an eco-friendly deinking process for the production of bioethanol using diverse hazardous paper wastes. Renew Energy 2020;146:2362–73:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.087.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Jain, KK, Kumar, A, Shankar, A, Pandey, D, Chaudhary, B, Sharma, KK. De novo transcriptome assembly and protein profiling of copper-induced lignocellulolytic fungus Ganoderma lucidum MDU-7 reveals genes involved in lignocellulose degradation and terpenoid biosynthetic pathways. Genomics 2020;112:184–98:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.01.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Chen, X, Xu, J, Liu, C, Zhu, Y, Nelson, DR, Zhou, S, et al.. Genome sequence of the model medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. Nat Commun 2012;3:1–9:26. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1923.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Sharma, KK. Fungal genome sequencing: basic biology to biotechnology. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2016;36:743–59:3. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2015.1015959.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Cantarel, BL, Coutinho, PM, Rancurel, C, Bernard, T, Lombard, V, Henrissat, B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37(Suppl_1): D233–8:1. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn663.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Borin, GP, Sanchez, CC, de Souza, AP, de Santana, ES, de Souza, AT, Leme, AF, et al.. Comparative secretome analysis of Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus niger during growth on sugarcane biomass. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129275:8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129275.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Kumar, A, Singh, D, Sharma, KK, Arora, S, Singh, AK, Gill, SS, et al.. Gel-based purification and biochemical study of laccase isozymes from Ganoderma sp. and its role in enhanced cotton callogenesis. Front Microbiol 2017;20:674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00674.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Chylenski, P, Bissaro, B, Sørlie, M, Røhr, ÅK, Varnai, A, Horn, SJ, et al.. Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases in enzymatic processing of lignocellulosic biomass. ACS Catal 2019;9:4970–91:22. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00246.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Arntzen, MØ, Bengtsson, O, Várnai, A, Delogu, F, Mathiesen, G, Eijsink, VG. Quantitative comparison of the biomass-degrading enzyme repertoires of five filamentous fungi. Sci Rep 2020;10:1–7:20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75217-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Coradetti, ST, Xiong, Y, Glass, NL. Analysis of a conserved cellulase transcriptional regulator reveals inducer‐independent production of cellulolytic enzymes in Neurospora crassa. MicrobiologyOpen 2013;2:595–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.94.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Kumar, A, Ahlawat, S, Mohan, H, Sharma, KK. Stabilization–destabilization and redox properties of laccases from medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum and human pathogen Yersinia enterocolitica. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;167:369–81:15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.169.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Chakraborty, S, Gupta, R, Jain, KK, Kuhad, RC. Cost-effective production of cellulose hydrolysing enzymes from Trichoderma sp. RCK65 under SSF and its evaluation in saccharification of cellulosic substrates. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2016;39:1659–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1641-6.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Chutani, P, Sharma, KK. Biochemical evaluation of xylanases from various filamentous fungi and their application for the deinking of ozone treated newspaper pulp. Carbohydr Polym 2015;127:54–63:20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.053.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Park, YJ, Jeong, YU, Kong, WS. Genome sequencing and carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) repertoire of the white rot fungus Flammulinaelastica. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082379.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Filiatrault-Chastel, C, Heiss-Blanquet, S, Margeot, A, Berrin, JG. From fungal secretomes to enzymes cocktails: the path forward to bioeconomy. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021;52:107833:15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107833.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Hu, LZ, Goebels, F, Tan, JH, Wolf, E, Kuzmanov, U, Wan, C, et al.. EPIC: software toolkit for elution profile-based inference of protein complexes. Nat Methods 2019;16:737–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0461-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. MacQueen, J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 1; 1967:281–97 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Kent, JT, Bibby, J, Mardia, KV. Multivariate analysis. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 1979.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Shankar, A, Sharma, KK. Fungal secondary metabolites in food and pharmaceuticals in the era of multi-omics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2022;12:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-11945-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Goodell, B, Winandy, JE, Morrell, JJ. Fungal degradation of wood: emerging data, new insights and changing perceptions. Coatings 2020;10:1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10121210.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Ferreira de Oliveira, JM, van Passel, MW, Schaap, PJ, de Graaff, LH. Proteomic analysis of the secretory response of Aspergillus niger to D-maltose and D-xylose. PLoS One 2011;6:e20865:17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020865.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Lian, D, Li, L, Liu, X, Zhong, X, Wang, H, Zhou, S, et al.. Time-scale dynamics of proteome predicts the central carbon metabolism involved in triterpenoid accumulation responsive to nitrogen limitation in Ganoderma lucidum. Fungal Biol 2021;125:294–304:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2020.11.009.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Van Erven, G, Kleijn, AF, Patyshakuliyeva, A, Di Falco, M, Tsang, A, De Vries, RP, et al.. Evidence for ligninolytic activity of the ascomycete fungus Podosporaanserina. Biotechnol Biofuels 2020;13:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01713-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. de Vries, RP, Mäkelä, MR. Genomic and postgenomic diversity of fungal plant biomass degradation approaches. Trends Microbiol 2020;28:487–99:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.01.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Munoz-Gomez, A, Corredor, M, Benitez-Paez, A, Pelaez, C. Development of quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ based on the immunological response of Galleria mellonella larvae challenged with Fusarium oxysporum microconidia. PLoS One 2014;9:e112179:7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082379.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Zeiner, CA, Purvine, SO, Zink, EM, Paša-Tolić, L, Chaput, DL, Haridas, S, et al.. Comparative analysis of secretome profiles of manganese (II)-oxidizing ascomycete fungi. PLoS One 2016;11:e0157844:19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157844.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Schneider, T, Gerrits, B, Gassmann, R, Schmid, E, Gessner, MO, Richter, A, et al.. Proteome analysis of fungal and bacterial involvement in leaf litter decomposition. Proteomics 2010;10:1819–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900691.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Girard, V, Dieryckx, C, Job, C, Job, D. Secretomes: the fungal strike force. Proteomics 2013;3:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201200282.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Liu, D, Li, J, Zhao, S, Zhang, R, Wang, M, Miao, Y, et al.. Secretome diversity and quantitative analysis of cellulolytic Aspergillus fumigatus Z5 in the presence of different carbon sources. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013;6:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-149.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Hori, C, Gaskell, J, Igarashi, K, Kersten, P, Mozuch, M, Samejima, M, et al.. Temporal alterations in the secretome of the selective ligninolytic fungus Ceriporiopsissubvermispora during growth on aspen wood reveal this organism’s strategy for degrading lignocellulose. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014;80:2062–70:1. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03652-13.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Jain, KK, Bhanja Dey, T, Kumar, S, Kuhad, RC. Production of thermostable hydrolases (cellulases and xylanase) from Thermoascusaurantiacus RCKK: a potential fungus. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2015;38:787–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1320-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Kumar, A, Arora, S, Jain, KK, Sharma, KK. Metabolic coupling in the co-cultured fungal-yeast suite of Trametesljubarskyi and Rhodotorulamucilaginosa leads to hypersecretion of laccase isozymes. Fungal Biol 2019;123:913–26:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2019.09.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Saini, S, Sharma, KK. Fungal lignocellulolytic enzymes and lignocellulose: a critical review on their contribution to multiproduct biorefinery and global biofuel research. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;193:2304–19:15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.063.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2023-0125).


Received: 2023-09-17
Accepted: 2023-12-03
Published Online: 2023-12-14
Published in Print: 2025-01-29

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znc-2023-0125/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen