Renewable mycelium based composite – sustainable approach for lignocellulose waste recovery and alternative to synthetic materials – a review

References

1. Cingolani, R, Athanassiou, A, Pompa, P. Modulating antibacterial properties using nanotechnology. Nanomedicine 2011;6:1483–5. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.11.133.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Ariga, K, Hill, JP, Bando, Y, Aono, M. Forming nanomaterials as layered functional structures toward materials nanoarchitectonics. NPG Asia Mater 2012;4:17. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2012.30.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Haneef, M, Caseracciu, L, Canale, C, Bayer, IS, Heredia-Guerrero, J, Athanassiou, A. Advanced materials from fungal mycelium: fabrication and tunning of physical properties. Sci Rep 2017:7–41292. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41292.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Fratzl, P, Barth, FG. Biomaterial systems for mechano-sensing and actuation. Nature 2009;462:442–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08603.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Montalti, M. The growing lab; 2010. Available from: http://www.corpuscoli.com/projects/the-growing-lab/.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Meyers, MA, McKittrick, J, Chen, PY. Structural biological materials: critical mechanics-materials connections. Science 2013;339:773–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220854.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Jones, M, Mautner, A, Luenco, S, Bismarck, A, John, S. Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: a critical review. Mater Des 2020;187:1083–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108397.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Irimia-Vladu, M. “Green” electronics: biodegradable and biocompatible materials and devices for sustainable future. Chem Soc Rev 2014;43:588–610. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60235d.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Camere, S, Karana, E. Fabricating materials from living organisms: an emerging design practice. J Clean Prod 2018;186:570–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.081.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Ciuffi, V. Growing design. Abitare Magazine 2013;531:108–11.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Karana, E, Blauwhoff, D, Hultink, EJ, Camere, S. When the material grows: a case study on designing (with) mycelium-based materials. Int J Des 2018;12:2.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Jones, M, Mautner, A, Lawrie, A, Huynh, T, Morrison, P, Mautner, A, et al.. Agricultural by-product suitability for the production of chitinous composites and nanofaibers utilising Trametes versocolor and Polyporus brumalis mycelial growth. Process Biochem 2019;80:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.01.018.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Mirabella, N, Castellani, V, Sala, S. Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review. J Clean Prod 2014;65:28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.051.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Piri, IS, Das, O, Hedenqvist, MS, Vaisanen, T, Ikram, S, Bhattacharyya, D. Imparting resiliency in biocomposite production systems: a system dynamics approach. J Clean Prod 2018;179:450–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.065.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Grimm, D, Wösten, HAB. Mushroom cultivation in the circular economy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2018;102:7795–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9226-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Meyer, V, Basenko, EY, Benz, PJ, Braus, GH, Mark, X, Caddick, et al.. Growing a circular economy with fungal biotechnology: a white paper. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 2020;7:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-020-00095-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Gianchetta, S, Di Maggio, B, Pier Luigi Burzi, PL, Galletti, S. Evaluation of selected white-rot fungal isolates for improving the sugar yield from wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014;173:609–23.10.1007/s12010-014-0869-3Suche in Google Scholar

18. Hermosilla, E, Schalchli, H, Mutis, A, Diez, MC. Combined effect of enzyme inducers and nitrate on selective lignin degradation in wheat straw by Ganoderma lobatum. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2017;24:21984–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9841-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Jones, M, Huynh, T, Dekiwadia, C, Daver, F, John, S. Mycelium composites: a review of engineering characteristics and growth kinetics. J Bionanoscience 2017;11:241–57. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbns.2017.1440.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Attias, N, Danai, O, Abitbol, T, Tarazi, E, Pereman, I, Grobman, YJ. Implementing bio-design tools to develop mycellium-based products. Des J 2019;22:1647–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1594997.10.1080/14606925.2019.1594997Suche in Google Scholar

21. Jones, M, Bhat, T, Huynh, T, Kandare, E, Yuen, R, Wang, CH, et al.. Waste-derived low-cost mycelium composite construction materials with improved fire safety. Fire Mater 2018a:1–10.10.1002/fam.2637Suche in Google Scholar

22. European Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, Belgium: Closing the Loop - an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy; 2015. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri¼CELEX%3A52015DC0614 [Accessed 13 Dec 2019].Suche in Google Scholar

23. Bracco, S, Calicioglu, O, Gomez San Juan, M, Flammini, A. Assessing the contribution of bioeconomy to the total economy: a review of national frameworks. Sustainability 2018;10:1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061698.Suche in Google Scholar

24. McCormick, K, Kautto, N. The bioeconomy in europe: an overview. Sustainability 2013;5:2589–608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Iqbal, HMN, Kyazze, G, Keshavarz, T. Advances in the valorization of lignocellulosic materials by biotechnology: an overview. BioResources 2013;8:3157–76. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.8.2.3157-3176.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Bilal, M, Asgherb, M, Iqbal, HMN, Hua, H, Zhanga, X. Biotransformation of lignocellulosic materials into value-added products—a review. Int J Biol Macromol 2017;98:447–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.133.Suche in Google Scholar

27. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). Converting waste agricultural biomass into a resource. United Nations Environment Programme Division of Technology. Osaka/Shiga, Japan: Industry and Economics International Environmental Technology Centre. Available from: www.unep.org/ietc/Portals/136/Publications/Waste.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Chun, AMS. Ground rules for humanitarian design. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.10.1002/9781119148784Suche in Google Scholar

29. Sánchez, C. Lignocellulosic residues: biodegradation and bioconversion by fungi. Biotechnol Adv 2009;27:185–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Tripathy, N, Hills, CD, Raj, S, Singh, SR, Atkinson, CJ. Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: harnessing a major potential resource. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci 2019;2:35.10.1038/s41612-019-0093-5Suche in Google Scholar

31. Anwara, Z, Gulfrazb, M, Irsha, M. Agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass a key to unlock the future bio-energy: a brief review. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 2014;7:163–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Bilal, M, Iqbal, HMN. Recent advancements in the life cycle analysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Curr Sustain Renew Energy Rep 2020;7:100–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-020-00153-5.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Scarlat, N, Dallemand, JF, Fahl, F. Biogas: developments and perspectives in Europe. Renew Energy 2018;129:457–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Mohanty, AK, Misra, M, Hinrichsen, G. Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng 2000;276:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::aid-mame1>3.0.co;2-w.10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-WSuche in Google Scholar

35. Dashtban, M, Schraft, H, Qin, W. Fungal bioconversion of lignocellulosic residues; opportunities & perspectives. Int J Biol Sci 2009;5:578–95. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.5.578.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Pérez, J, Muñoz-Dorado, J, De-la-Rubia, T, Martínez, J. Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol 2002;5:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Agbor, VB, Cicek, N, Sparling, R, Berlin, A, Levin, DB. Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 2011;29:675–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Barakat, A, de Vries, H, Rouau, X. Dry fractionation process as an important step in current and future lignocellulose biorefineries: a review. Bioresour Technol 2013;134:362–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.169.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Singhvi, M, Gokhale, DV. Lignocellulosic biomass: hurdles and challenges in its valorization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019;103:9305–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10212-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Singh, T, Singh, A. White and brown rot fungi as decomposers of lignocellulosic materials and their role in waste and pollution control. Fungal applications in sustainable environmental biotechnology. Fungal Biol 2016:233–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42852-9_9.Suche in Google Scholar

41. Kumar, M, Thammannagowda, BV, ChiangV, Han, KH, Joshi, CP, Mansfield, SD, et al.. An update on the nomenclature for the cellulose synthase genes in Populus. Trends Plant Sci 2009;14:248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.02.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Rubin, EM. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 2008;454:841–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07190.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Abdel-Hamid, AM, Solbiati, JO, Cann, IK. Insights into lignin degradation and its potential industrial applications. Adv Appl Microbiol 2013;82:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407679-2.00001-6.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Antunes, F, Marçal, S, Taofiq, O, Alcina Morais, AM, Freitas, AC, Ferreira, IC, et al.. Valorization of mushroom by-products as a source of value-added compounds and potential applications. Molecules 2020;25:2672. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112672.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Lelivelt, RJJ. The mechanical possibilities of mycelium materials. Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

46. Arifin, YH, Yusuf, Y. Mycelium fibers as new resource for environmental sustainability. Procedia Eng 2013;53:504–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.065.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Attias, N, Danai, O, Ezov, N, Tarazi, E, Grobman, YJ. Developing novel applications of mycelium based biocomposite materials for design and architecture. In: Conference: Building with bio-based materials: Best practice and performance specification. Croatia: University of Zagreb; 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Bruscato, C, Malvessi, E, Brandalise, RN, Camassola, M. High performance of macrofungi in the production of mycelium-based biofoams using sawdust - sustainable technology for waste reduction. J Clean Prod 2019;234:225–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.150.Suche in Google Scholar

49. Tuck, CO. Valorization of biomass: deriving more value from waste. Science 2012;337:695–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218930.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Alves, RME, Alves, ML, Campos, MJ. Morphology and thermal behaviour of new mycelium-based composites with different types of substrates. In: Almeida, HA, Vasco, JC, editors. Progress in digital and physical manufacturing. Cham: Springer; 2020. pp. 189–97.10.1007/978-3-030-29041-2_24Suche in Google Scholar

51. Elsacker, E, Vandelook, S, Brancart, J, Peeters, E, De Laet, L. Mechanical, physical and chemical characterisation of mycelium-based composites with different types of lignocellulosic substrates. PLoS One 2019;14:e0213954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213954.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

52. Liao, JC, Mi, L, Pontrelli, S, Luo, S. Fuelling the future: microbial engineering for the production of sustainable biofuels. Nat Publ Gr 2016;4:288–304. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.32.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Board, B. The bioeconomy initiative: implementation framework. Belgium: Brussels; 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

54. Pérez, R, Luccioni, M, Kamakaka, R, Clamons, S, Gaut, N, Stirling, F, et al.. Enabling community-based metrology for wood-degrading fungi. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 2020;7:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-020-00092-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

55. Floudas, D, Binder, M, Riley, R. The paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science 2012;336:1715–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221748.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Loyd, AL, Held, BW, Linder, ER, Smith, JA, Blanchette, RA. Elucidating wood decomposition by four species of Ganoderma from the United States. Fungal Biol 2018;122:254–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2018.01.006.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Higgins, C, Margot, H, Warnquist, S, Obeysekare, E, Mehta, K. Mushroom cultivation in the developing world: a comparison of cultivation technologies. In: GHTC 2017 - IEEE Glob Humanit Technol Conf Proc; October 19-22 in San Jose, CA, USA.10.1109/GHTC.2017.8239314Suche in Google Scholar

58. Bayer, E. The mycelium revolution is upon us. Sci Am 2019. Available from: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-mycelium-revolution-is-upon-us/?print=true [Accessed 1 July 2019].Suche in Google Scholar

59. Yamanaka, S, Kikuchi, R. Complex of fibers and fungi and a process for preparation thereof. U.S. Patent No. 5 074 959 1991. Available from: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/eb/f7/2d/49306791c9c256/US5074959.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

60. Mattos-Shipley, KMJ, Ford, KL, Alberti, F, Banks, AM, Bailey, AM, Foster, GD. The good, the bad and the tasty: the many roles of mushrooms. Stud Mycol 2016;85:125–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2016.11.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

61. Blackwell, M. The Fungi: 1, 2, 3 … 5.1 million species? Am J Bot 2011;98:426–38. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000298.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Hibbett, DS. A phylogenetic overview of the Agaricomycotina. Mycologia 2006;98:917–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832621.Suche in Google Scholar

63. Holt, GA, Mcintyre, G, Flagg, D, Bayer, E, Wanjura, JD, Pelletier, MG. Fungal mycelium and cotton plant materials in the manufacture of biodegradable molded packaging material: evaluation study of select blends of cotton byproducts. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 2012;6:431–9. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2012.1241.Suche in Google Scholar

64. Pelletier, MG, Holt, GA, Wanjura, JD, Bayer, E, McIntyre, G. An evaluation study of mycelium based acoustic absorbers grown on agricultural by-product substrates. Ind Crop Prod 2013;51:480–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.09.008.Suche in Google Scholar

65. Nawawi, W, Jones, M, Murphy, RJ, Lee, KY, Kontturi, E, Bismarck, A. Nanomaterials derived from fungal sources - is it the new hype? Biomacromolecules 2019;21:30–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01141.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66. Cerimi, K, Akkaya, KC, Pohl, C, Schmidt, B, Neubauer, P. Fungi as source for new bio-based materials:a patent review. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 2019;6:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-019-0080-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

67. Bonfante, P, Genre, A. Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant – fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nat Commun 2010;1:48. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1046.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

68. Islam, MR, Tudryn, G, Bucinell, R, Schadler, L, Picu, RC. Morphology and mechanics of fungal mycelium. Sci Rep 2017;7:13070. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13295-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

69. Fricker, M, Boddy, L, Bebber, D. In Biology of the fungal cell. Sci Rep 2007;7:309–30.Suche in Google Scholar

70. Girometta, C, Picco, AM, Baiguera, RM, Dondi, D, Babbini, S, Cartabia, M, et al.. Physico-mechanical and thermodynamic properties of mycelium-based biocomposites: a review. Sustainability 2019;11:281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010281.Suche in Google Scholar

71. Lew, RR. How does a hypha grow? The biophysics of pressurized growth in fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011;9:509–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2591.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

72. Webster, J, Weber, R. Introduction to Fungi, 3rd ed. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press; 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511809026Suche in Google Scholar

73. Wösten, HA. Hydrophobins: multipurpose proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol 2001;55:625–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.625.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

74. Zampieri, F, Wösten, HA, Scholtmeijer, K. Creating surface properties using a palette of hydrophobins. Materials 2010;3:4607–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3094607.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

75. Ten Have, R, Teunissen, PJM. Oxidative mechanisms involved in lignin degradation by white-rot fungi. Chem Rev 2001;101:3397–413. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr000115l.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

76. Bennett, JW, Wunch, KG, Faison, BD. Use of fungi in biodegradation. In: Hurst, CJ, editor. Manual of environmental microbiology. Washington DC: AMS Press; 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

77. Jones, M, Huynh, T, John, S. Inherent species characteristic influence and growth performance assessment for mycelium composite applications. Adv Mater Lett 2018b;9:71–80. https://doi.org/10.5185/amlett.2018.1977.Suche in Google Scholar

78. Hammel, KE. Fungal degradation of lignin. In: Cadisch, G, Giller, KE, editors. Driven by nature: Plant litter quality and decomposition. Michigan, USA: CAB-International; 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

79. Shah, ZA, Ashraf, M, Ishtiaq, M. Comparative study on cultivation and yield performance of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) on different substrates (wheat straw, leaves, saw dust). Pak J Nutr 2004;3:158–60. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2004.158.160.Suche in Google Scholar

80. Potumarthi, R, Baadhe, RR, Nayak, P, Jetty, A. Simultaneous pretreatment and saccharification of rice husk by Phanerochete chrysosporium for improved production of reducing sugars. Bioresour Technol 2013;128:113–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.030.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

81. Appels, FV, Camere, S, Montalti, M, Karana, E, Jansen, KM, Dijksterhuis, J, et al.. Fabrication factors influencing mechanical, moisture-and water-related properties of mycelium-based composites. Mater Des 2019;161:64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.027.Suche in Google Scholar

82. Attias, N, Danai, O, Abitbol, T, Tarazi, E, Ezov, N, Peremean, I, et al.. Mycelium bio-composites in industrial design and architecture: comparative review and experimental analysis. J Clean Prod 2020;246:119–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119037.Suche in Google Scholar

83. Sun, W, Tajvidi, M, Hunt, CG, McIntyre, G, Gardner, DJ. Fully bio-based hybrid composites made of wood, fungal mycelium and cellulose nanofibrils. Sci Rep 2019;9:37–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40442-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

84. Bayer, E, McLntyre, G. Method for producing rapidly renewable chitinous material using fugal fruiting bodies and product made thereby. US20090307969A1; 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

85. Tacer-Caba, Z, Varis, JJ, Lankinen, P, Mikkonen, KS. Comparison of novel fungal mycelia strains and sustainable growth substrates to produce humidity-resistant biocomposites. Mater Des 2020;192:108–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108728.Suche in Google Scholar

86. Chen, B, Liu, J. Properties of lightweight expanded polystyrene concrete reinforced with steel fiber. Cement Concr Res 2004;34:1259–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.014.Suche in Google Scholar

87. Haghi, AK, Arabani, M, Ahmadi, H. Applications of expanded polystyrene (EPS) beads and polyamide-66 in civil engineering, Part One: lightweight polymeric concrete. Compos Interfac 2006;13:441–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855406777408575.Suche in Google Scholar

88. Araújo, JR, Waldman, WR, De Paoli, MA. Thermal properties of high density polyethylene composites with natural fibres: coupling agent effect. Polym Degrad Stabil 2008;93:1770–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.07.021.Suche in Google Scholar

89. Ceseracciu, L, Heredia-Guerrero, JA, Dante, S, Athanassiou, A, Bayer, IS. Robust and biodegradable elastomers based on corn starch and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015;7:3742–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/am508515z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Epicoco, M. Patterns of innovation and organizational demography in emerging sustainable fields: an analysis of the chemical sector. Res Policy 2016;45:427–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.013.Suche in Google Scholar

91. Shalwan, A, Yousif, BF. State of art: mechanical and tribological behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Des 2013;48:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.014.Suche in Google Scholar

92. Thakur, VK, Thakur, MK. Processing and characterization of natural cellulose fibers/thermoset polymer composites. Carbohydr Polym 2014;109:102–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.039.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

93. Thakur, VK, Thakur, MK, Raghavan, P, Kessler, MR. Progress in green polymer composites from lignin for multifunctional applications: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2014;2:1072–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500087z.Suche in Google Scholar

94. Cui, S, Yao, B, Sun, X, Hu, J, Zhou, Y, Liu, Y. Reducing the content of carrier polymer in pectin nano fibers by electro spinning at low loading followed with selective washing materials. Mater Sci Eng C 2016;59:885–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.086.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

95. Valdes, A, Burgos, N, Jimenez, A, Garrigos, M. Natural pectin polysaccharides as edible coatings. Coatings 2015;5:865–86. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5040865.Suche in Google Scholar

96. Hardy, JG, Roemer, LM, Scheibel, TR. Polymeric materials based on silk proteins. Polymer 2008;49:4309–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.08.006.Suche in Google Scholar

97. Fernández‐Pan, I, Ignacio, J, Caballero, M. Biopolymers for edible films and coatings in food applications. In: Plackett, editor. Biopolymers-New materials for sustainable films and coatings. Denmark: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.10.1002/9781119994312.ch11Suche in Google Scholar

98. Verlinden, RAJ, Hill, DJ, Kenward, MA, Williams, CD, Radecka, I. Bacterial synthesis of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Appl Microbiol 2007;102:1437–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03335.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

99. Vilela, C, Sousa, AF, Fonseca, AC, Serra, AC, Coelho, JFJ, Carmen, SR, et al.. The quest for sustainable polyesters - insights into the future. Polym Chem 2014;5:3119–41. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3py01213a.Suche in Google Scholar

100. Kalia, S, Dufresne, A, Cherian, BM, Kaith, BS, Averous, L, Njuguna, J, et al.. Cellulose-based bio- and nanocomposites: a review. Int J Polym Sci 2011:837875.10.1155/2011/837875Suche in Google Scholar

101. Johansson, C. Renewable fibers and bio-based materials for packaging applications - a review of recent developments. Bioresources 2012;7:2506–52. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.2.2506-2552.Suche in Google Scholar

102. Öner, ET. Microbial production of extracellular polysaccharides from biomass. In: Fang, Z, editor. Pretreatment techniques for biofuels and biorefineries. Springer; China 2013.10.1007/978-3-642-32735-3_2Suche in Google Scholar

103. Jiang, L, Walczyk, DF, Mooney, L, Putney, S. Manufacturing of mycelium based biocomposites SAMPE. France: SAMPE Europe International Technical Conference and Forum; 2013:1944–55 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

104. Tokiwa, Y, Calabia, BP, Ugwu, CU, Aiba, S. Biodegradability of plastics. Int J Mol Sci 2009;10:3722–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10093722.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

105. Carlile, MJ, Watkinson, SC. The fungi, 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier; 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

106. Deacon, JW. Introduction to modern mycology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1980.Suche in Google Scholar

107. Kavanagh, K, editor. Fungi: Biology and applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.10.1002/9781119976950Suche in Google Scholar

108. Appels, VW, Dijksterhuis, J, Lukasiewicz, CE, Jansen, KM, Wösten, HAB, Krijgsheld, P. Hydrophobin gene deletion and environmental growth conditions im-pact mechanical properties of mycelium by affecting the density of the materia. Sci Rep 2018;8:4703. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23171-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

109. Lopez Nava, JA, Mendez Gonzalez, J, Ruelas Chacon, X, Najera Luna, JA. Assessment of edible fungi and films bio-based material simulating expanded polystyrene. Mater Manuf Process 2016;31:1085–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1070420.Suche in Google Scholar

110. Xing, Y, Brewer, M, El-Gharabawy, H, Griffith, G, Jones, P. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2018;121:022032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/121/2/022032.Suche in Google Scholar

111. Travaglini, S, Noble, J, Ross, PG, Dharan, CKH. Mycology matrix composites. Proc of the American Society for Comp 2013:517–35.Suche in Google Scholar

112. Jiang, L, Walczyk, DF, McIntyre, G, Bucinell, R. Manufacturing of biocomposite sandwich structures using mycelium-bound cores and preforms. J Manuf Process 2017;28:50–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.04.029.Suche in Google Scholar

113. Jiang, L, Walczyk, D, McIntyre, G, Bucinell, R, Li, B. Bioresin infused then cured mycelium-based sandwich-structure biocomposites: resin transfer molding (RTM) process, flexural properties, and simulation. J Clean Prod 2019;207:123–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.255.Suche in Google Scholar

114. Appels, F, Wösten, H. Mycelium materials. Encyclopedia of Mycology 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.21131-X.Suche in Google Scholar

115. Manan, S, Wajid Ullah, M, Ul-Islam, M, Mohammad, O, Yang, G. Synthesis and applications of fungal mycelium-based advanced functional materials. J Bioresour Bioprod 2021;6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2021.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

116. Yang, Z, Zhang, F, Still, B, White, M, Amstislavski, P. Physical and mechanical properties of fungal mycelium-based bio-foam. J Mater Civ Eng 2017;29:04017030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001866.Suche in Google Scholar

117. Liu, R, Long, L, Sheng, Y, Xu, J, Qiu, H, Li, X, et al.. Preparation of a kind of novel sustainable mycelium/cotton stalk composites and effects of pressing temperature on the properties. Ind Crop Prod 2019;141:111732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111732.Suche in Google Scholar

118. Parisi, S, Rognoli, V, Garcia, AC. Designing materials experiences through passing of time – material driven design method applied to mycelium based composites. In: Celebration & Contemplation, 10th International Conference on Design & Emotion, Amsterdam, 27–30 September 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

119. Läkk, H, Krijgsheld, P, Montalti, M, Wösten, H. Fungal based biocomposite for habitat structures on the Moon and Mars 69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Bremen, Germany, 1–5 October 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

120. Wösten, H, Montalti, M. Fungal based biocomposite for habitat structures on the Moon and Mars Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress. IAC; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

121. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Could Future Homes on the Moon and Mars Be Made of Fungi? Online publication. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/ames/myco-architecture.Suche in Google Scholar

122. Zolotovsky, K. Guided growth: design and computation of biologically active materials [Ph.D. thesis]. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2017.Suche in Google Scholar