Startseite Electronic structure and chemical bonding in LaIrSi-type intermetallics
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Electronic structure and chemical bonding in LaIrSi-type intermetallics

  • Samir F. Matar , Rainer Pöttgen EMAIL logo und Michel Nakhl
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Januar 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The cubic LaIrSi type has 23 representatives in aluminides, gallides, silicides, germanides, phosphides, and arsenides, all with a valence electron count of 16 or 17. The striking structural motif is a three-dimensional network of the transition metal (T) and p element (X) atoms with TX3/3 respectively XT3/3 coordination. Alkaline earth or rare earth atoms fill cavities within the polyanionic [TX]δ− networks. The present work presents a detailed theoretical study of chemical bonding in LaIrSi-type representatives, exemplarily for CaPtSi, BaIrP, BaAuGa, LaIrSi, CeRhSi, and CeIrSi. DFT-GGA-based electronic structure calculations show weakly metallic compounds with itinerant small magnitude DOSs at EF except for CeRhSi whose large Ce DOS at EF leads to a finite magnetization on Ce (0.73 μB) and induced small moments of opposite sign on Rh and Si in a ferromagnetic ground state. The chemical bonding analyses show dominant bonding within the [TX]δ− polyanionic networks. Charge transfer magnitudes were found in accordance with the course of the electronegativites of the chemical constituents.

1 Introduction

The equiatomic phases RTX (R=alkali, alkaline earth, rare earth or actinoid; T=transition metal; X=element of the 3rd, 4th, or 5th main group) comprise one of the largest families of intermetallic compounds with more than 3000 representatives [1]. Usually one observes formation of a two- or three-dimensional [TX]δ− polyanionic network where the R atoms charge compensate the polyanion and fill layers or cavities between respectively within the network. Depending on the chemical nature of the three elements forming a RTX phase, more than 30 different structure types are known for the simple equiatomic composition [2]. Systemization of the structure types and crystal chemical details of these phases have been discussed in several review articles ([3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], and references therein). Most of the RTX phases exhibit metallic behavior and show certain flexibility for the valence electron count (VEC). Typical examples are the TiNiSi type with e.g. VEC=14 for CaRhIn [10] and VEC=18 for CaAgSb [11] or the ZrNiAl type with e.g. VEC=15 for CeIrIn [12] and VEC=18 for CaAgP [13]. Given their large geometrical (variation of lattice parameters and positional parameters) and electronic flexibility, the latter two structure types comprise the majority of the RTX phases (more than 2000).

In contrast, only 23 representatives (Fig. 1) are known for the cubic LaIrSi type [14], which is a coloring variant of the Zintl phase SrSi2. Besides the precise structural characterization, several property studies on the LaIrSi-type phases have been published. LaRhSi and LaIrSi are superconductors with critical temperatures of 4.35 and 2.3 K, respectively [10]. CeIrSi [21] shows Curie-Weiss paramagnetism with a stable trivalent ground state without any sign for magnetic ordering down to low temperatures, while NdIrSi orders ferromagnetically at TC=10 K [19]. Temperature dependent 151Eu Mössbauer spectra prove divalent europium in EuPdSi, EuPtSi [26] and EuPtGe [18]. The paramagnetic rare earth atoms in the latter tetrelides lie on a trillium lattice which hampers magnetic ordering in a simple AF Heisenberg model (magnetic frustration in triangular arrangements) [27].

Fig. 1: Intermetallic compounds with cubic LaIrSi-type structure, space group P213. VEC=16 or 17 can be realized by five different element combinations. The respective numbers of valence electrons are listed in red.
Fig. 1:

Intermetallic compounds with cubic LaIrSi-type structure, space group P213. VEC=16 or 17 can be realized by five different element combinations. The respective numbers of valence electrons are listed in red.

Apart from the property investigations, only a brief study on chemical bonding in LaIrSi has been reported. Extended Hückel calculations [28] showed enhanced stability for this type for lower VEC, however, in view of the small energy differences (with respect to the LaPtSi and the AlB2 type), also packing requirements were discussed as structure determining effects. From Fig. 1 it is readily evident, that most of the 23 LaIrSi-type phases have VEC=16, although we observe different coloring on all three sites. In continuation of our systematic studies on structure-property relationships of RTX intermetallics we have now analyzed chemical bonding in the whole family of LaIrSi-type phases.

2 Methods

Based on experimental crystal data and their description it was necessary to complement such data with further analyses of the electronic band structure and the chemical bonding using computational methods built within the well-established quantum theoretical density functional theory (DFT) framework [29], [30].

For this purpose, use was made of two scalar relativistic full potential augmented spherical wave (ASW) methods [31], [32]. The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional [33], accounting for the effects of exchange and correlations within DFT, was considered in all calculations. Besides the electronic density of state DOS, we discuss qualitatively the pair interactions based on the overlap population analysis with the crystal orbital overlap population (COOP) [34]. In the plots, positive, negative and zero COOP magnitudes indicate bonding, anti-bonding, and non-bonding interactions, respectively. For details on the methods the reader is referred to the theoretical development in [35].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Crystal chemistry

The LaIrSi type derives from the structure of the Zintl phase SrSi2 [36], [37], [38] through an ordered substitution of iridium and silicon atoms on the silicon network. This requires a translationengleiche symmetry reduction from P4132 (or the enantiomorphic group P4332) to P213, along with a splitting of the 8c subcell site into two 4a sites. A view of the LaIrSi structure approximately along the a axis is presented in Fig. 2. The ordered helical chains are readily evident from this drawing. For the present study on the electronic structures and chemical bonding we chose CaPtSi [16], BaIrP [23], BaAuGa [15], LaIrSi [14], CeRhSi [20] and CeIrSi [21] as representatives. The basic crystallographic data of these phases are listed in Table 1.

Fig. 2: Crystal structure of the LaIrSi-type phases ATX, space group P213. The three-dimensional [TX] network is emphasized.
Fig. 2:

Crystal structure of the LaIrSi-type phases ATX, space group P213. The three-dimensional [TX] network is emphasized.

Table 1:

Crystallographic data of the LaIrSi-type phases ATX (A=Ca, Ba, La, Ce; T=Rh, Ir, Pt, Au; X=P, Si, Ga); space group P213.

CaPtSiBaIrPBaAuGaLaIrSiCeRhSiaCeIrSi
a, pm632.0653.1693.49636.3623.1629.15
x (A)0.12760.11220.61440.13250.61700.6170
x (T)0.41890.40110.33660.42300.33000.3300
x (X)0.83450.83370.91160.8390.9080.908
TX, pm230 (3×)236 (3×)251 (3×)232 (3×)228 (3×)228 (3×)
Σrcov(T+X), pm246236259243242243
AT, pm317 (3×)347 (3×)350 (3×)315 (3×)309 (3×)313 (3×)
319 (1×)327 (1×)334 (1×)320 (1×)313 (1×)313 (1×)
Σrcov(A+T), pm303324332295290291
AX, pm321 (1×)315 (1×)357 (1×)324 (1×)314 (1×)317 (1×)
321 (3×)327 (3×)358 (3×)328 (3×)324 (3×)327 (3×)
Σrcov(A+X), pm291308323286282282
Reference[16][23][15][14][20][21]

Data for the sums of the covalent radii were taken from Emsley [41].

aThe positional parameters of CeIrSi [21] were used.

Before we turn to the crystal chemical description, we need to comment on related compounds. LaIrSi crystallizes with space group P213 (no. 198), the Pearson symbol cP12 and the Wyckoff sequence a3. A search for 198;a3 in the Pearson data base [1] leads to 100 entries. The latter are assigned to the prototypes ZrOS [39] and NiSbS (ullmanite structure; a pyrite superstructure) [40] which show distinctly different features of chemical bonding (dumb-bell formation vs a three-dimensional polyanionic network). Herein we solely focus on the intermetallics which are ascribed to the ZrOS type (Fig. 1).

Each T atom in the LaIrSi-type phases is coordinated by three X atoms and vice versa with TX distances equal or smaller than the sum of the covalent radii [41] for T+X (see Table 1). Comparison of these distances is already indicative of strong covalent TX bonding, the main bonding interaction in the LaIrSi-type phases (vide infra). The TX3/3 units share common corners, leading to a three-dimensional [TX]δ− polyanionic network in which the alkaline earth and rare earth atoms fill cages. The size of the cages and the coordination of the alkaline earth, respectively rare earth atoms is different within the series of investigated compounds. For CaPtSi, LaIrSi, CeRhSi and CeIrSi both the RT and the RX bonds are distinctly longer than the sums of the covalent radii (Table 1), while BaIrP and BaAuGa both have one short RT contact. This might be a consequence of the large size of barium along with electronegativity differences. These alterations are addressed in more detail below.

3.2 Density of states

For the six ternary representatives discussed above, total spins, non-spin-polarized calculations were carried out with the crystallographic data listed in Table 1. Such calculations can provide the ground state electronic configuration as non-magnetic or not according to the magnitude of the density of states at the Fermi level: n(EF), i.e. if it is small or too large, respectively. This is described more quantitatively below.

The site-projected densities of states (PDOS) are shown in Fig. 3. The zero energy along the x axis is given with respect to the Fermi level EF and the six ternary compounds are seen to be metallic. However, the two Ce based compounds present a high density of states due to the Ce 4f states. This could be associated with an instability of the electronic system in such a spin-degenerate configuration and a lowering of the energy (stabilization) should show up upon carrying out spin polarized (SP) magnetic calculations (vide infra). On the contrary the Rh d-DOS are found in the energy window –6; –2 eV well within the valence band (VB), with small PDOS at EF. Thus the magnetic instability is due to the Ce 4f states which should develop magnetic moments in SP calculations.

Fig. 3: Site projected density of states PDOS in total spins (NSP) configuration for LaIrSi-type phases ATX: (a) CaPtSi, (b) BaIrP, (c) BaAuGa, (d) LaIrSi, (e) CeRhSi and (f) CeIrSi.
Fig. 3:

Site projected density of states PDOS in total spins (NSP) configuration for LaIrSi-type phases ATX: (a) CaPtSi, (b) BaIrP, (c) BaAuGa, (d) LaIrSi, (e) CeRhSi and (f) CeIrSi.

Due to their relatively large filling, the d-like PDOS of Pt, Ir and Au especially with a saturated d subshell are found well within the VB, similarly to Rh. EF is crossed by itinerant low intensity DOS arising from s,p PDOS of the constituents. The four compounds CaPtSi, BaIrP, BaAuGa and LaIrSi are then qualified as weakly metallic (showing almost a pseudo-gap).

In all compounds the lower part of the VB is dominated by s states of the X atoms and the quantum mixing of the valence states leading to the chemical bonding mainly observed in the energy window ~ –6–EF. The DOS description should then be complemented with an analysis of the chemical bonding between atoms belonging to the different substructures. This is discussed in the next section.

3.3 Crystal orbital overlap population analyses

The chemical bonding is discussed based on the analysis of the overlap populations Sij between two chemical species i and j, within the crystal orbitals overlap populations (COOP) scheme of Hoffmann [34]. Figure 4 show the COOPs for the different interactions between the substructures. As described in the crystal chemistry section the major bonding is identified with high intensity T–X COOPs in all panels, in accordance with the above described [TX]δ− polyanionic network. This is followed by less intense R–X COOPs found closer to the Fermi level due to the positioning of X p states in that energy region. Lastly the RT interactions are found with least intensity which show mixing at the highest energy part of T d states at –4 eV for CaPtSi and –2 eV for BaIrP. An exception is observed for BaAuGa where the Au d states do not show significant mixing with Ba due to a saturation of the Au d subshell as mentioned above.

Fig. 4: Chemical bonding from overlap populations with the COOP criterion for interactions between the different substructures of the ATX phases: (a) CaPtSi, (b) BaIrP, (c) BaAuGa, (d) LaIrSi, (e) CeRhSi and (f) CeIrSi. (Positive and negative COOP magnitudes indicate bonding and antibonding interactions; cf. text).
Fig. 4:

Chemical bonding from overlap populations with the COOP criterion for interactions between the different substructures of the ATX phases: (a) CaPtSi, (b) BaIrP, (c) BaAuGa, (d) LaIrSi, (e) CeRhSi and (f) CeIrSi. (Positive and negative COOP magnitudes indicate bonding and antibonding interactions; cf. text).

Most COOPs seem to be optimized at EF. An increase of the valence electron count (within a rigid-band model) would tend towards antibonding states, thus destabilizing the respective phase. This might be a reason for the almost strict occurrence of VEC=16 phases with the LaIrSi type.

3.4 Bader analyses

The analysis of the charge density issued from the self-consistent calculations can be done using the AIM (atoms in molecules) approach [42] developed by Bader who devised an intuitive way of splitting molecules into atoms as based purely on the electronic charge density. Note that such analyses may not be a tool for evaluating absolute ionizations but allows establishing trends between similar compounds.

The charge analyses typically lead to the VEC scheme in Fig. 1: for instance in CaPtSi (VEC=2+10+4) the Bader analysis of the charges provides small magnitude electron transfers between the different chemical species, namely: ∆Q(Ca)=+0.50; ∆Q(Pt)=–0.09 and ∆Q(Si)=–0.41; the sum leading to neutrality as expected. On may not expect full ionization such as Ca2+ due to the covalent character within these intermetallic compounds.

On the other hand, for BaIrP and BaPdSi we get

BaIrP: ΔQ(Ba)=+1.22; ΔQ(Ir)=0.69 and ΔQ(P)=0.53;

BaPdSi: ΔQ(Ba)=+0.92; ΔQ(Pd)=1.01 and ΔQ(Si)=0.09;

clearly the larger electronegativity of P: χ=2.19 compared to that of Si: χ=1.80 is responsible of larger charge transfer on the transition metal; knowing that Pd and Ir have similar magnitudes near χ=2.20.

However, greater electron transfer is noted when the transition element is more electronegative as Au with χ=2.54 in the presence of a less electronegative p element as Ga (χ=1.81) in BaAuGa:

ΔQ(Ba)=+1.7; ΔQ(Au)=1.6 and ΔQ(Ga)=0.1

The charge transfer clearly classifies BaAuGa as an auride. Nevertheless we keep the chemical formula in its classical form for better comparison with the remaining compounds. Similar Bader charges for the gold atoms were observed for Na2Au3Al [43] and EuAu3Al2 [44]. Also binary BaAu [45] is a classical auride.

Whereas all studied compounds obey the VEC=16 or 17 electron count, the amount of electron transfer (either way) is dependent of the respective electron affinities of the chemical constituents.

3.5 Magnetic instability

The large Ce PDOS intensity at the Fermi level of both cerium representatives let us suggest a magnetic instability particularly in view of the trivalent character of Ce estimated from the VEC analysis and the experimental magnetic susceptibility data of CeIrSi [21].

Therefore spin-polarized (SP) electronic structure calculations were carried out for CeIrSi and CeRhSi. At self-consistent convergence only CeRhSi presents a stable magnetic solution mCe= 0.73 μB, mRh= –0.14 μB and mSi= –0.003 μB. The energy difference with respect to the NSP configuration is ∆E(SP-NSP)=–0.29 eV, showing a stable SP configuration. Figure 5 shows the site and spin projected DOS of SP CeRhSi where the energy shift between the majority (↑) and minority (↓) spin population provides the magnetic moment. This shift is clearly observed for Ce and not for Rh or Si. Thus the moments on Rh and Si are of induced nature (opposite sign) due to the quantum mixing with the Ce valence states.

Fig. 5: CeRhSi DOS in spin polarized SP configuration; (a) ground state ferromagnetic configuration with majority (↑) and minority (↓) spin populations; (b) antiferromagnetic configuration with full compensation of UP spins half-cell and DOWN spins half-cell (cf. text).
Fig. 5:

CeRhSi DOS in spin polarized SP configuration; (a) ground state ferromagnetic configuration with majority (↑) and minority (↓) spin populations; (b) antiferromagnetic configuration with full compensation of UP spins half-cell and DOWN spins half-cell (cf. text).

In order to confirm CeRhSi in a SP-feromagnetic ground state, further calculations imposing an antiferromagnetic order were needed. This was done by assuming half of the cell as UP-SPINS (2 formula units FU) and the other half as DOWN-SPINS (the other 2 FU). The self-consistent calculation led to lower magnitude moments with mCe=±0.44 μB, mRh=±0.004 μB and mSi=0.0 μB. Also an energy increase with the such imposed AF order was observed with ∆E(SPferro–SPantiferro)=–0.14 eV. Although the energy difference is only half of ∆E(SP-NSP) above, the results let us propose the compound to be in a ferromagnetic ground state.

No stable magnetic model was obtained for CeIrSi. This is in line with the magnetic susceptibility measurements which showed Curie-Weiss paramagnetism and no magnetic ordering down to 2 K [21]. Unfortunately no magnetic data were reported for CeRhSi [20].

4 Conclusion

Although most LaIrSi-type compounds form only with VEC=16, they offer a broader crystal chemistry, comprising aluminides, silicides, phosphides, or arsenides. Chemical bonding analyses show weakly metallic behavior for materials with divalent cations while the cerium based members reveal a large Ce pDOS near the Fermi level.

Acknowledgments

Support from “Plateforme de Recherche en Nanomatériaux et Nanosciences (PRN2), Ecole Doctorale Sciences et Technologies”, Université Libanaise at Fanar is gratefully acknowledged. Part of the computations was carried out on MCIA-Université de Bordeaux facilities.

References

[1] P. Villars, K. Cenzual, Pearson’s Crystal Data: Crystal Structure Database for Inorganic Compounds (release 2015/16), ASM International®, Materials Park, Ohio (USA) 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] M. L. Fornasini, F. Merlo, J. Alloys Compd. 1995, 219, 63.10.1016/0925-8388(94)05010-4Suche in Google Scholar

[3] E. Parthé, L. Gelato, B. Chabot, M. Penzo, K. Cenzual, R. Gladyshevskii, TYPIX–Standardized Data and Crystal Chemical Characterization of Inorganic Structure Types, Gmelin Handbook of Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry, 8th edition, Springer, Berlin 1993.10.1007/978-3-662-10641-9Suche in Google Scholar

[4] A. Szytuła, J. Leciejewicz, Handbook of Crystal Structures and Magnetic Properties of Rare Earth Intermetallics, CRC Press, Boca Raton 1994.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] A. Szytuła, Croatica Chem. Acta1999, 72, 171.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] M. D. Bojin, R. Hoffmann, Helv. Chim. Acta2003, 86, 1653.10.1002/hlca.200390140Suche in Google Scholar

[7] S. Gupta, K. G. Suresh, J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 618, 562.10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.079Suche in Google Scholar

[8] R. Pöttgen, O. Janka, B. Chevalier, Z. Naturforsch. 2016, 71b, 165.10.1515/znb-2016-0013Suche in Google Scholar

[9] O. Janka, O. Niehaus, R. Pöttgen, B. Chevalier, Z. Naturforsch. 2016, 71b, 737.10.1515/znb-2016-0101Suche in Google Scholar

[10] R.-D. Hoffmann, R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2000, 626, 28.10.1002/(SICI)1521-3749(200001)626:1<28::AID-ZAAC28>3.0.CO;2-TSuche in Google Scholar

[11] F. Merlo, M. Pani, M. L. Fornasini, J. Less-Common Met. 1990, 166, 319.10.1016/0022-5088(90)90014-BSuche in Google Scholar

[12] V. I. Zaremba, U. Ch. Rodewald, R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2005, 631, 1065.10.1002/zaac.200400452Suche in Google Scholar

[13] A. Mewis, Z. Naturforsch. 1979, 34b, 14.10.1515/znb-1979-0105Suche in Google Scholar

[14] K. Klepp, E. Parthé, Acta Crystallogr. B1982, 38, 1541.10.1107/S056774088200630XSuche in Google Scholar

[15] C. Benndorf, S. Seidel, F. Stegemann, B. Mausolf, L. Schubert, H. Eckert, M. Bartsch, H. Zacharias, F. Haarmann, O. Janka, R. Pöttgen, Chem. Eur. J.2017, submitted for publication.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] J. Evers, G. Oehlinger, J. Solid State Chem. 1986, 62, 133.10.1016/0022-4596(86)90223-9Suche in Google Scholar

[17] J. Evers, G. Oehlinger, K. Polborn, B. Sendlinger, J. Solid State Chem. 1991, 91, 250.10.1016/0022-4596(91)90079-WSuche in Google Scholar

[18] R. Pöttgen, R. K. Kremer, W. Schnelle, R. Müllmann, B. D. Mosel, J. Mater. Chem. 1996, 6, 635.10.1039/JM9960600635Suche in Google Scholar

[19] B. Chevalier, P. Lejay, A. Cole, M. Vlasse, J. Etourneau, Solid State Commun. 1982, 41, 801.10.1016/0038-1098(82)91252-2Suche in Google Scholar

[20] A. Lipatov, A. Gribanov, A. Grytsiv, S. Safronov, P. Rogl, J. Rousnyak, Y. Seropegin, G. Giester, J. Solid State Chem. 2010, 183, 829.10.1016/j.jssc.2010.01.029Suche in Google Scholar

[21] B. Heying, R. Pöttgen, M. Valldor, U. Ch. Rodewald, R. Mishra, R.-D. Hoffmann, Monatsh. Chem. 2004, 135, 1335.10.1007/s00706-004-0209-3Suche in Google Scholar

[22] A. Löhken, G. J. Reiß, D. Johrendt, A. Mewis, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2005, 631, 1144.10.1002/zaac.200400534Suche in Google Scholar

[23] C. Lux, A. Mewis, S. Junk, A. Gruetz, G. Michels, J. Alloys Compd. 1993, 200, 135.10.1016/0925-8388(93)90483-4Suche in Google Scholar

[24] J. Evers, G. Oehlinger, K. Polborn, B. Sendlinger, J. Alloys Compd. 1992, 182, L23.10.1016/0925-8388(92)90593-XSuche in Google Scholar

[25] G. Wenski, A. Mewis, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1986, 535, 110.10.1002/zaac.19865350413Suche in Google Scholar

[26] D. T. Adroja, B. D. Padalia, S. K. Malik, R. Nagarajan, R. Vijayaraghavan, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1990, 89, 375.10.1016/0304-8853(90)90751-BSuche in Google Scholar

[27] T. E. Redpath, J. M. Hopkinson, Phys. Rev. B2010, 82, 014410.10.1103/PhysRevB.82.014410Suche in Google Scholar

[28] C. Zheng, R. Hoffmann, Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 1074.10.1021/ic00305a015Suche in Google Scholar

[29] P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864.10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864Suche in Google Scholar

[30] W. Kohn, L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133.10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133Suche in Google Scholar

[31] A. R. Williams, J. Kübler, C. D. Gelatt Jr., Phys. Rev. B1979, 19, 6094.10.1103/PhysRevB.19.6094Suche in Google Scholar

[32] V. Eyert, The Augmented Spherical Wave Method – A Comprehensive Treatment, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2007, chapter 719.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865.10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1987, 26, 846.10.1002/anie.198708461Suche in Google Scholar

[35] S. F. Matar, Prog. Solid State Chem. 2010, 38, 1.10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2010.08.003Suche in Google Scholar

[36] K. H. Janzon, H. Schäfer, A. Weiss, Angew. Chem. 1965, 77, 258.10.1002/ange.19650770605Suche in Google Scholar

[37] P. I. Kripyakevich, E. I. Gladyshevskii, Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 1967, 11, 693.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] G. E. Pringle, Acta Crystallogr. 1972, 28B, 2326.10.1107/S0567740872006053Suche in Google Scholar

[39] J. D. McCullough, L. Brewer, L. A. Bromley, Acta Crystallogr. 1948, 1, 287.10.1107/S0365110X4800079XSuche in Google Scholar

[40] L. S. Ramsdell, Am. Mineral. 1925, 10, 281.10.1364/JOSA.10.000281Suche in Google Scholar

[41] J. Emsley, The Elements, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] R. Bader, Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 893.10.1021/cr00005a013Suche in Google Scholar

[43] F. Stegemann, C. Benndorf, Y. Zhang, M. Bartsch, H. Zacharias, B. P. T. Fokwa, H. Eckert, O. Janka, Inorg. Chem. 2017, submitted for publication.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] J.-P. Schmiegel, T. Block, B. Gerke, T. Fickenscher, R. S. Touzani, B. P. T. Fokwa, O. Janka, Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 9057.10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01530Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] V. Saltykov, J. Nuss, M. Konuma, M. Jansen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2009, 635, 70.10.1002/zaac.200800300Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-10
Accepted: 2016-11-23
Published Online: 2017-1-20
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 17.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0230/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen