Home Syntheses, crystal structures, and characterization of two Mn(II) coordination polymers with bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone ligands
Article Publicly Available

Syntheses, crystal structures, and characterization of two Mn(II) coordination polymers with bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone ligands

  • Gao-Feng Wang EMAIL logo , Xiao Zhang EMAIL logo , Shu-Wen Sun , Hong Sun , Xia Yang , Hui Li , Chen-Zhong Yao , Shu-Gang Sun , Yu-Peng Tang and Li-Xin Meng
Published/Copyright: June 24, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Two Mn(II) complexes, {[Mn(BIPMO)2Cl2] · 2(H2O)}n (1) and {[Mn(BIPMO)2(SCN)2] · 2(CH3OH)}n (2) (BIPMO = bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone) with V-shaped BIPMO ligands, were synthesized and characterized by IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses along with their single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. The Mn(II) ions in 1 and 2 are both six-coordinated to four nitrogen atoms of four BIPMO ligands and two anions (Cl for 1, and SCN for 2) to form a distorted octahedral geometry.

1 Introduction

Coordination polymers with various intriguing structural motifs have been actively studied due to their potential applications as chemical sensors, and in gas storage, separation, luminescence, and catalysis [18]. An effective and facile method for the design of these complexes is still the appropriate choice of well-designed organic ligands as bridges or terminal groups (building blocks) with metal ions or metal clusters as nodes. Among various organic ligands, N-donor ligands are often selected as multifunctional organic linkers because of their unique ability to coordinate metal ions, allowing for various structural topologies, and also because of their ability to act as hydrogen bond acceptors to assemble supramolecular structures [9, 10].

Many bi-, tri-, and multidentate N-donor ligands have been reported, but the chemistry is still underdeveloped [1113]. In this paper, we report the syntheses and characterization of two coordination polymers with the novel V-shaped ligand bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone (BIPMO), {[Mn(BIPMO)2Cl2] · 2(H2O)}n (1) and {[Mn(BIPMO)2(SCN)2] · 2(CH3OH)}n (2) (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1: Molecular formula of the ligand bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone (BIPMO).
Scheme 1:

Molecular formula of the ligand bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone (BIPMO).

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Preparation and characterization of the complexes

Complexes 1 and 2 were prepared as colorless crystalline products via the combination of BIPMO with the metal ion (MnCl2 for 1; MnCl2 and NH4SCN for 2). The complexes are stable in common solvents such as benzene, hexane, ethanol, and dichloromethane.

The structures of 1 and 2 were characterized by infrared (IR) spectroscopy, elemental analyses, single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetry.

The IR spectra of 1 and 2 were consistent with their formulation. Weak IR bands centered at ca. 3100 cm−1 can be assigned to ν(C–H) of the ligands. A large group of bands in the region 1610–1430 cm−1 are characteristic of ν(C=N) and ν(C=C) stretches of aromatic groups and reveal the presence of ligands BIPMO.

2.2 Molecular structures of 1 and 2

The crystal structure data are summarized in Table 1. Selected bond lengths and angles for 1 and 2 are listed in Table 2. The results of the single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis indicate that the structures of complexes 1 and 2 are similar. Accordingly, the structure of 1 is described representatively here in detail. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/m with Z = 2. The asymmetric unit contains one Mn(II) ion, two BIPMO ligands, two Cl anions, and two uncoordinating water molecules. As shown in Fig. 1, the basal plane around the Mn(II) ion is formed by four nitrogen atoms of four BIPMO ligands with a Mn–N distance of 2.254(2) Å. The apical positions of the octahedral geometry are occupied by two Cl anions with a distance of 2.5943(8) Å. These parameters are similar to those observed in other Mn(II) complexes [1416]. Each BIPMO ligand binds to two Mn(II) ions through the terminal N atoms of the imidazole rings, resulting in closed rings. The ring structure looks like a rhombus window of approximate dimensions of 11.20 × 16.47 Å, and the distance between the two Mn(II) ions is 16.469(3) Å. These subunits are linked by sharing the Mn(II) atoms with adjacent subunits, together with the coordination of two Cl anions, to form the resultant infinite chain. The chain structure of 1 is further stabilized by C2–H2···Cl1 (C2···Cl1, 3.146(3) Å; C2–H2···Cl1, 123°, symmetry codes: –x, –y, 1 – z) hydrogen bonds. It should be noted that each chain in compound 1 interacts with two neighboring chains via weak C1–H1···O1 contacts (C1···O1, 3.275(3) Å; C1–H1···O1, 113°, symmetry codes: 1/2 – x, 1/2 – y, –z) along the crystallographic b axis to form a 2D layer. The layer is stabilized by C–H···π interactions between C3–H3 and the Cg1 ring (C3···Cg1 = 3.648(3) Å, symmetry code: 1 – x, y, 1 – z) along the c axis to form a three-dimensional network (Cg1 is the ring comprising the atoms C4–C9 for both 1 and 2) (Table 3, Fig. 2).

Table 1:

Summary of crystallographic data for complexes {[Mn(BIPMO)2Cl2] · 2(H2O)}n (1), and {[Mn(BIPMO)2(SCN)2] · 2(CH3OH)}n (2) C38H28Cl2MnN8O2 (1) and C42H36MnN10O4S2 (2).

Compound12
Empirical formulaC38H28Cl2MnN8O2 · 2H2OC40H28MnN10O2S2 · 2CH3OH
Formula weight790.56863.87
T, K293(2)293(2)
Crystal system; space groupMonoclinic; C2/mTriclinic, P
a, Å10.9985(5)9.5993(5)
b, Å21.2104(6)9.6403(5)
c, Å8.6611(4)11.3742(6)
α, deg9085.235(5)
β, deg113.267(5)84.720(4)
γ, deg9082.353(4)
V, Å−31856.17(13)1036.11(10)
Z21
Dcalc., g cm−31.411.38
μ, mm−10.60.5
F (000), e814447
θ range, deg3.20–25.492.92–25.35
hmin, hmax–7, 13–9, 11
kmin, kmax–25, 24–11, 11
lmin, lmax–10, 10–13, 13
Data/restraints/parameters1783/3/1283795/0/271
Reflections collected/unique3700/17838099/3795
Rint0.02480.0280
Goodness-of-fit on F21.0351.055
R1/wR2 [I > 2 σ(I)]0.0500/0.14520.0509/0.1308
R1/wR2 (all data)0.0596/0.15230.0687/0.1461
Largest peak/hole, e Å−30.94/–0.400.33/–0.46
Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for complexes 1 and 2.a

12
Mn(1)–N(1)2.254(2)Mn(1)–N(5)2.236(3)
Mn(1)–Cl(1)2.5943(8)Mn(1)–N(1)#12.266(2)
Mn(1)–Cl(1)#22.5943(8)Mn(1)–N(4)#22.270(2)
O(1)–C(10)1.217(4)O(1)–C(10)1.209(3)
N(1)–C(1)–N(2)111.37(19)N(5)–Mn(1)–N(5)#1180
O(1)–C(10)–C(7)119.72(14)N(5)–Mn(1)–N(1)#191.51(9)
C(7)–C(10)–C(7)#1120.6(3)N(5)–Mn(1)–N(1)88.49(9)
N(1)#2–Mn(1)–N(1)#390.71(10)N(5)#1–Mn(1)–N(1)91.51(9)
N(1)#2–Mn(1)–N(1)#489.29(10)N(1)#1–Mn(1)–N(1)180
N(1)#3–Mn(1)–N(1)#4180N(5)–Mn(1)–N(4)#288.52(10)
N(1)#2–Mn(1)–N(1)180N(5)#1–Mn(1)–N(4)#291.48(10)
N(1)#3–Mn(1)–N(1)89.30(10)N(1)#1–Mn(1)–N(4)#288.39(8)
N(1)#4–Mn(1)–N(1)90.70(10)N(1)–Mn(1)–N(4)#291.61(8)
N(1)#2–Mn(1)–Cl(1)#287.33(5)N(5)–Mn(1)–N(4)#391.48(10)
N(1)#3–Mn(1)–Cl(1)#292.67(5)N(5)#1–Mn(1)–N(4)#388.52(10)
N(1)–Mn(1)–Cl(1)#292.67(5)N(1)#1–Mn(1)–N(4)#391.61(8)
N(1)–Mn(1)–Cl(1)87.33(5)N(1)–Mn(1)–N(4)#388.39(8)
Cl(1)#2–Mn(1)–Cl(1)180N(4)#2–Mn(1)–N(4)#3180
C(1)–N(1)–C(2)105.6(2)C(1)–N(1)–Mn(1)128.6(2)
C(1)–N(1)–Mn(1)132.52(15)C(2)–N(1)–Mn(1)122.19(18)
C(2)–N(1)–Mn(1)121.64(17)C(17)–N(4)–Mn(1)#4127.0(2)

aFor 1: symmetry operations: #1x, –y, z; #2x, –y, –z + 1; #3x, y, –z + 1; #4x + 1, y, –z; for 2: symmetry operations: #1x + 2, –y, –z + 1; #2x + 1, y – 1, z – 1; #3x + 1, –y + 1, –z + 2; #4x – 1, y + 1, z + 1.

Fig. 1: Coordination environments of complex 1. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: #1x, –y, z; #2 –x, –y, –z + 1; #3 –x, y, –z + 1; #4 –x + 1, y, –z.
Fig. 1:

Coordination environments of complex 1. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: #1x, –y, z; #2x, –y, –z + 1; #3x, y, –z + 1; #4x + 1, y, –z.

Table 3:

Intra- and intermolecular interactions for 1 and 2 (Å, deg).a

ComplexD–H···Ad(D–H)d(H···A)d(D···A)∠DHASymmetry operations
C1–H1···O10.932.803.275(3)1131/2 – x, 1/2 – y, –z
1C2–H2···Cl10.932.813.416(3)123x, –y, 1–z
C3–H3···Cg10.932.803.648(3)1531 – x, y, 1 – z
C2–H2···O10.932.833.134(8)1001 + x, y, z
C2–H2···O10.932.923.357(8)1101 – x, 1 – y, 1 – z
C3–H3···O10.932.693.057(8)1041 + x, y, z
C5–H5···S10.933.013.695(8)132x, 1 + y, z
2C6–H6···S10.933.363.873(7)117x, 1 + y, z
C13–H13···O20.932.923.430(8)1161 – x, 1 – y, 2 – z
C15–H15···O20.932.773.666(8)161x – 1, y – 2, z
C17–H17···O20.932.773.418(7)1271 – x, 1 – y, 2 – z
C18–H18···O20.932.993.812(8)149x – 1, y + 1, z
O2–H2A···S10.822.583.376(8)163x, y, z
C21–H21A···Cg10.962.903.827(8)161x, y, z

aCg1 is the ring comprising the atoms C4–C9 for both 1 and 2.

Fig. 2: A view of the chain in complex 1.
Fig. 2:

A view of the chain in complex 1.

Compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group, P1̅ with Z = 1. As shown in Fig. 3, the BIPMO ligands, such as 1, connect the Mn(II) ions to generate similar rings of approximate dimensions of 9.73 × 16.97 Å. The distance between the two Mn(II) ions across the ring is longer than that of 1, due to the rotation of an imidazole ring (Scheme 2). The N atoms coordinated with each Mn(II) ion come from four BIPMO ligands and two SCN anions, with Mn(II) in a distorted octahedral geometry (Figs. 3 and 4).

Scheme 2: Ligand coordination modes in complexes 1 (left) and 2(right).
Scheme 2:

Ligand coordination modes in complexes 1 (left) and 2(right).

Fig. 3: Coordination environments of complex 2. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: #1 –x + 2, –y, –z + 1; #2x + 1, y – 1, z – 1; #3 –x + 1, –y + 1, –z + 2; #4x – 1, y + 1, z + 1.
Fig. 3:

Coordination environments of complex 2. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: #1x + 2, –y, –z + 1; #2x + 1, y – 1, z – 1; #3x + 1, –y + 1, –z + 2; #4x – 1, y + 1, z + 1.

Fig. 4: A view of the chain in complex 2.
Fig. 4:

A view of the chain in complex 2.

2.3 Thermal stability

Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were carried out for complexes 1 and 2 in order to characterize the compounds more fully in terms of thermal stability (Fig. 5). For complex 1, the weight loss corresponding to the release of free water molecules is observed from 35 to 130°C (observed 5.0%, calculated 4.55%). Then no significant weight loss is observed until the decomposition of the frameworks occurs at 297°C. For complex 2, the weight loss from 50 to 131°C is consistent with the loss of two free methanol molecules (observed 7.2%, calculated 7.42%). The decomposition of the frameworks occurs from 315 to 606°C.

Fig. 5: TGA curves for complexes 1 and 2.
Fig. 5:

TGA curves for complexes 1 and 2.

3 Conclusions

In this paper, we have reported the syntheses, crystal structures, and characterization of two new Mn(II) coordination polymers with the novel ligand BIPMO. The distances between the adjacent Mn(II) ions in the chains are different due to the rotation of an imidazole ring. Hydrogen bonds and weak C–H···π interactions in the crystals link the chains to form 3D supramolecular structures.

4 Experimental section

4.1 Materials and measurements

All solvents, MnCl2·4H2O, and NH4SCN were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Shanghai, China). Elemental analyses were performed on an Elementar Vario ELIII elemental analyzer. The IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Vector 22 spectrophotometer with KBr pellets in the 4000–400 cm−1 region. TGA were carried out on a NETZSCH STA 449F3 unit at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 under a nitrogen–oxygen (80:20) atmosphere.

4.2 Synthesis of bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone

A mixture of imidazole (3.40 g, 50 mmol), anhydrous potassium carbonate (6.90 g, 100 mmol), 4,4′-difluorodiphenylmethanone (5.45 g, 25 mmol), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (50 mg), and dimethyl sulphoxide (30.0 mL) was stirred for a period of 24 h at 80°C and, after cooling to room temperature, was poured into crushed ice (100 mL). Pale yellow precipitates obtained were filtered, washed with distilled water, and dried in air. Yield: 95.6%. – Anal. for C19H14N4O: calcd. C 72.60, H 4.49, N 17.82; found C 72.47, H 4.38, N 17.74%. – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.00 (s, 1H, imidazole-H), 7.99–7.57 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.41 (s, 1H, imidazole-H), 7.29 (s, 1H, imidazole-H). – IR (KBr, cm−1): 3124, 1639, 1599, 1573, 1519, 1481, 1421, 1369, 1325, 1301, 1261, 1180, 1148, 1109, 1055, 956, 926, 899, 860, 831, 766, 746, 662, 622, 519, 473.

4.3 Synthesis of {[Mn(BIPMO)2Cl2] · 2(H2O)}n (1)

Complex 1 was prepared by a layering method. A buffer solution (5 mL) of methanol was carefully layered over a methanol solution (5 mL) of MnCl2·4H2O (19.8 mg, 0.1 mmol). Then a solution of BIPMO (62.8 mg, 0.2 mmol) in methanol (10 mL) was layered over the buffer layer. Colorless block crystals were obtained after a week. Yield: 65% (based on BIPMO). – Anal. for C38H32Cl2MnN8O4: calcd. C 57.73, H 4.08, N, 14.17; found: C 57.51, H 3.91, N 14.04%. – IR (cm−1): 3124, 3083, 1659, 1603, 1556, 1520, 1488, 1470, 1421, 1321, 1306, 1265, 1238, 1176, 1119, 1057, 958, 928, 856, 768, 739, 719, 673, 654, 620, 523, 469.

4.4 Synthesis of {[Mn(BIPMO)2(SCN)2] · 2(CH3OH)}n (2)

A buffer solution (5 mL) of methanol was carefully layered over a methanol solution (5 mL) of MnCl2·4H2O (19.8 mg, 0.1 mmol) and NH4SCN (15.2 mg, 0.2 mmol). Then a solution of BIPMO (62.8 mg, 0.2 mmol) in methanol (10 mL) was layered over the buffer layer. Colorless block crystals were obtained after 1 week. Yield: 68% (based on BIPMO). – Anal. for C42H36MnN10O4S2: calcd. C 58.39, H 4.20, N 16.21; found: C 58.16, H 4.08, N 16.04%. – IR (cm−1): 3141, 2073, 1657, 1637, 1606, 1522, 1490, 1402, 1304, 1284, 1256, 1188, 1119, 1061, 959, 928, 853, 819, 766, 737, 652, 516, 475.

4.5 X-ray crystallography

All measurements were made on an Agilent Technology SuperNova Eos Dual system with a (MoKα, λ = 0.71073 Å) micro focus source and focusing multilayer mirror optics. The data were collected at a temperature of 293 K and processed using CrysAlis Pro [17]. Absorption corrections were applied using the SADABS program [18]. The structures were solved by Direct Methods [19] with the Shelxtl (version 6.10) program [19, 20] and refined by full matrix least-squares techniques on F2 with Shelxtl [19, 20]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The ligand hydrogen atoms were localized in their calculated positions and refined using a riding model. The water hydrogen atoms were located in difference maps and refined with d(O–H) = 0.85(2) Å and d(H···H) = 1.35(2) Å distances as restraints.

CCDC 1439673 and 1439674 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 51108122 to XZ

Award Identifier / Grant number: 21576230 to C-ZY

Funding statement: We are grateful for financial support from Young Teacher Starting-up Research of Yuncheng University (No. YQ-2015007 to G-FW) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51108122 to XZ and 21576230 to C-ZY).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for financial support from Young Teacher Starting-up Research of Yuncheng University (No. YQ-2015007 to G-FW) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51108122 to XZ and 21576230 to C-ZY).

References

[1] Y. He, W. Zhou, G. Qian, B. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5657.10.1039/C4CS00032CSearch in Google Scholar

[2] S. Ma, D. Sun, J. M. Simmons, C. D. Collier, D. Yuan, H.-C. Zhou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1012.10.1021/ja0771639Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] J.-R. Li, R. J. Kuppler, H.-C. Zhou, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1477.10.1039/b802426jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] M. D. Allendorf, C. A. Bauer, R. K. Bhakta, R. J. T. Houk, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1330.10.1039/b802352mSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] M. P. Suh, Y. E. Cheon, E. Y. Lee, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 1007.10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.032Search in Google Scholar

[6] Z. Hu, B. J. Deibert, J. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev.2014, 43, 5815.10.1039/C4CS00010BSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] J. S. Seo, D.Whang, H. Lee, S. I. Jun, J. Oh, Y. J. Jeon, K. Kim, Nature2000, 404, 982.10.1038/35010088Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] A. Dhakshinamoorthy, H. Garcia, Chem. Soc. Rev.2014, 43, 5750.10.1039/C3CS60442JSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] D. Singh, J. B. Baruah, Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 3169.10.1021/cg300342aSearch in Google Scholar

[10] B.-C. Tzeng, A. Chao, T. Selvam, T.-Y. Chang, CrystEngComm2013, 15, 5337.10.1039/c3ce40558cSearch in Google Scholar

[11] G.-F. Wang, Q.-J. Gong, H. Sun, C.-Z. Yao, Crystallogr. Rep. 2013, 58, 1113.10.1134/S1063774513080105Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. A. Agarwal, A. Aijaz, M. Ahmad, E. C. Sañudo, Q. Xu, P. K. Bharadwaj, Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 2999.10.1021/cg300217vSearch in Google Scholar

[13] L. Luo, P. Wang, G.-C. Xu, Q. Liu, K. Chen, Y. Lu, Y. Zhao, W.-Y. Sun, Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 2634.10.1021/cg300220qSearch in Google Scholar

[14] H.-F. Zhu, W. Zhao, T. Okamura, J. Fan, W.-Y. Sun, N. Ueyama, New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 1010.10.1039/B315842JSearch in Google Scholar

[15] X.-L. Mu, Acta Crystallogr. 2011, E67, m166.Search in Google Scholar

[16] L. Ballester, I. Baxter, P. C. M. Duncan, D. M. L. Goodgame, D. A. Grachvogel, D. J. Williams, Polyhedron1998, 17, 3613.10.1016/S0277-5387(98)00157-0Search in Google Scholar

[17] CrysAlis Pro Software System (version 1.171.35.19), Intelligent Data Collection and Processing Software for Small Molecule and Protein Crystallography, Agilent Technologies Ltd., Yarnton, Oxfordshire (U.K.) 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[18] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxtl (version 6.1), Software Reference Manual, Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[20] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-2-21
Accepted: 2016-4-7
Published Online: 2016-6-24
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0050/html
Scroll to top button