Home Cycloaddition reactions of 2H-1-benzothietes and 1,3,5,7-tetrathio-s-indacene-2,6-dithiones
Article Publicly Available

Cycloaddition reactions of 2H-1-benzothietes and 1,3,5,7-tetrathio-s-indacene-2,6-dithiones

  • Dieter Gröschl , Dieter Schollmeyer and Herbert Meier EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 29, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

2H-1-benzothiete (1) and 2H,5H-benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]bisthiete (3) react in form of their open valence isomers with the trithiocarbonic acid esters 2a–c. The one- or twofold cycloaddition reactions yield 1,3-dithiin rings, in which C-2 is a spiro-C atom, that bears four sulfur groups. The bifunctional reactant 3 gives additionally band-shaped, hardly soluble oligomers.

1 Introduction

2H-1-benzothietes represent very useful, versatile synthons for numerous syntheses of larger heterocyclic ring systems [16]. 2-Methylenecyclohexa-3,5-diene-1-thione, the open valence isomer 1′ of 2H-1-benzothiete (1), is a highly reactive 8π system, which adds to many double and triple bond systems in [8π + 2π] cycloaddition reactions (hetero-Diels–Alder reactions). Apart from CC, CN, CP double and triple bonds and CC, CN, CO, NN, NO, NS and PS double bonds, CS double bonds are interesting reaction partners [16]. The latter cycloaddition leads to 4H-1,3-benzodithiins [7, 8].

We report here on the reactions of 2H-1-benzothiete (1) and 2H,5H-benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]bisthiete (3) and 1,3,5,7-tetrathio-s-indacene-2,6-dithiones (2a–c) (Fig. 1). The combination of 1 and 2 can lead to spiro-compounds as 1:1- or 2:1-adducts. The bifunctional systems 2 and 3, on the other hand, could give 1:1-, 1:2-, 2:1-, 2:2-, 2:3- and higher adducts (AB oligomers).

Fig. 1: Benzothietes 1 and 3 and C=S reaction partners 2.
Fig. 1:

Benzothietes 1 and 3 and C=S reaction partners 2.

2 Results and discussion

We prepared 2H-1-benzothiete (1) by flash vacuum pyrolysis (FVP) of 2-mercaptobenzyl alcohol [9, 10]. A large pyrolysis apparatus enables the preparation of several 100 g in a few hours. The 1,3,5,7-tetrathio-s-indacene-2,6-dithiones (benzo[1,2-d:4,5-d′]bis[1,3]dithiole-2,6-dithiones (2) were obtained according to literature protocols: 2a [1113], 2b [14, 15], 2c [16, 17].

Heating of 1 to 110°C provokes the generation of the valence isomer 1′ with an opened four-membered ring. This 8π-system reacted with 2a; however, the virtual insolubility of 2a rendered the process unhelpful. Therefore, we studied this reaction in detail with the much better soluble alkoxy derivatives 2b and 2c. 1:1-Ratios of the starting compounds led to the spiro-compounds 4b (44%) and 4c (37%) and to diastereomeric pairs of the bis-spiro-compounds 5b/5b′ (32%) and 5c/5c′ (35%) (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1: Reaction of 1 and 2b, c to monocycloadduct 4b, c and cis- and trans-bisadducts 5b, c/5b′, c′.
Scheme 1:

Reaction of 1 and 2b, c to monocycloadduct 4b, c and cis- and trans-bisadducts 5b, c/5b′, c′.

The [8π + 2π] cycloadditions were highly regioselective, so that 1,3-dithiin rings were formed. However, the twofold cycloadditions are not stereoselective. According to the 13C NMR spectra, the cis-products 5b, c and the trans-products 5b′, c′ were generated in a ratio of 1:1. Due to the symmetry of 2, all products are achiral. The pseudo-symmetry point groups of the products are indicated in Scheme 1 – in order to make the NMR characterization better understandable (Table 1).

Table 1:

13C NMR data of the compounds 4b, 4c, 5b/5b′, 5c/5c′, 6b and 7c (δ values in CDCl3, TMS as internal standard).

CompoundRing-CH2Aromat. CHAromat. CqCS4C=SOCH2CH2CH3
4b36.0127.6, 128.1, 129.2, 131.8132.5, 132.6, 135.4, 139.4, 141.382.7211.269.115.7
4c36.1127.2, 128.1, 129.2, 131.8132.3, 132.5, 135.6, 139.4, 141.682.7211.373.422.5, 25.4, 30.0, 31.514.0
5b/5b36.05 36.08127.6, 127.6, 128.0, 128.0, 128.91, 128.98, 131.65, 131.70130.76, 130.77, 135.9, 135.9, 139.2, 139.5, 142.77, 142.8382.20, 82.2468.5, 68.715.7, 15.7
5c/5c36.03127.5, 127.5, 127.9, 128.83, 128.91, 131.64, 131.71130.5, 130.5, 136.0, 136.0, 139.14, 139.32, 143.06, 143.1282.14, 82.1472.85, 72.9922.5, 22.5, 25.4, 25.4, 30.0, 30.0, 31.5, 31.514.0, 14.0
6b36.6, 36.9120.3, 126.5129.0, 131.2, 132.6, 139.0, 141.3, 141.7, 145.383.5211.369.115.7
7c35.5130.1131.9, 132.6, 136.3, 138.7, 141.682.4211.073.522.5, 25.4, 30.0, 31.414.0

The second reaction discussed here concerns 4,9-dithiatricyclo[6.2.0.03,6]deca-1,3(6),7-triene (2H-benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]bisthiete (3)) [18, 19], a highly reactive “bisdiene” system, which should be able to generate polymers/oligomers in the reaction with the bifunctional compounds 2 [20]. A diluted solution of 3 and 2b (ratio 1:1) reacted in boiling toluene to give a large amount of an insoluble solid and 15% of the 1:1 cycloadduct 6b (Scheme 2). When 2c was used, which has a higher solubility than 2b in toluene, and when the ratio of the two starting compounds 3 and 2c was 1:2, 36% of the 1:2 adduct 7c could be obtained. The major portion of the resulting products were again hardly soluble solids. The mass spectroscopic studies (FD spectra) plead for the formation of homo- and heterooligomers (Fig. 2).

Scheme 2: Reaction of bisthiete 3 and the thiocarbonyl compounds 2b and 2c, respectively.
Scheme 2:

Reaction of bisthiete 3 and the thiocarbonyl compounds 2b and 2c, respectively.

Fig. 2: Oligomer series: 8 formed by oligomerization of 3; 9 formed by oligocondensation of 2c; 10 formed by oligocycloaddition of 3 and 2c.
Fig. 2:

Oligomer series: 8 formed by oligomerization of 3; 9 formed by oligocondensation of 2c; 10 formed by oligocycloaddition of 3 and 2c.

The oligomers 8, derived from monomer 3, have been found earlier [19]. The generation of the series 9 (n = 2, m/z = 916; n = 3, m/z = 1342 and n = 4, m/z = 1768) was unexpected, because the condensation of 2 by elimination of S needs normally more drastic conditions [17, 21]. Members of the series 10 (AB oligomers) were detected up to m/z = 1802, which corresponds to a 2:3 adduct of 3 and 2b. The cycloadducts 8 and 9 have band structures; and 10 can be regarded as a twisted band.

The structure elucidation of 4b, c, 5b, c/5b′, c′, 6b and 7c was based on 1H and 13C NMR measurements (Table 1) and on a crystal structure analysis of 4b. The most interesting 1H NMR data concern the ring-CH2 groups. Their δ values (in CDCl3) are between 4.2 and 4.3 ppm for the four-membered rings of 1, 3 and 6b and between 3.85 and 3.95 ppm for the six-membered rings in 4b, 4c, 5b/5b′, 5c/5c′, 6b and 7c.

The most important 13C NMR data concern the C=S groups and the spiro-C atoms C(SR)4. The sp2-C atoms of the thiocarbonyl functions have δ values of 211.1±0.1 ppm in 4b, 4c and 6b. The transformation into spiro-carbon atoms leads by a drastic up-field shift to δ values between 82.1 and 83.5 ppm for 4b, 4c, 5b/5b′, 5c/5c′, 6b and 7c.

A selection of X-ray data of 4b is compiled in Table 2. The 1,3-dithiole rings have an envelope conformation, whereas the 1,3-thirane rings adopt a twisted chair conformation.

Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (Å), bond angles (deg) and torsion angles (deg) of 4b in the crystalline state.

C1–S161.633(4)
C5–S41.833(4)
C5–S61.824(4)
C5–S91.825(4)
C5–S151.813(4)
S2–C1–S8113.6(2)
S8–C1–S16122.5(2)
S16–C1–S2123.9(2)
S4–C5–S6106.9(2)
S6–C5–S9113.4(2)
S9–C5–S15115.4(2)
S15–C5–S4109.9(2)
C7A–C2A–S2–C1–1.3(3)
C2A–S2–C1–S81.9(2)
S2–C1–S8–C7A–1.8(2)
C1–S8–C7A–C2A0.9(3)
C3A–C6A–S6–C5–21.8(3)
C6A–S6–C5–S432.2(2)
S6–C5–S4–C3A–31.3(2)
C5–S4–C3A–C6A18.9(3)
C9A–C13A–C14–S1560.8(4)
C13A–C14–S15–C5–54.0(3)
C14–S15–C5–S9–3.4(3)
S15–C5–S9–C9A49.8(2)
C5–S9–C9A–C13A–55.2(3)

Figure 3 depicts a Platon plot of 4b and Fig. 4 the unit cell of the crystals, which have 4b molecules in a herringbone arrangement with included toluene molecules.

Fig. 3: A Platon plot of 4b.
Fig. 3:

A Platon plot of 4b.

Fig. 4: Herring bone arrangement of the molecules and unit cell in crystalline 4b.
Fig. 4:

Herring bone arrangement of the molecules and unit cell in crystalline 4b.

3 Conclusion

Benzothiete 1 and benzobisthiete 3 react in form of their 8π valence isomers with one or both CS double bonds of the tetrathia-s-indacenedithiones 2a–c. The resulting spiro-heterocycles 4 and 6 and the bis-spiro-heterocycles 5 and 7 were characterized by their 1H and 13C NMR data and in the case of 4b by a crystal structure analysis. All observed [8π + 2π] cycloadditions are highly regioselective, so that 1,3-dithiin rings are generated, which bear two sulfur substituents on C–2. Accordingly, C–2 is a spiro-carbon atom with four sulfur groups. These compounds can be regarded as tetrathiocarbonic acid orthoesters. They are thermally stable and are cleaved by strong acids [22]. Moreover, hardly soluble oligomers were obtained, whose FD mass spectra suggest band structures.

4 Experimental section

NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AM 400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C. FD MS (5 kV) and EI MS (70 eV) measurements were performed with a Finnigan MAT 95 spectrometer. Elemental analyses were determined in the microanalytical laboratory of the Chemistry Department of the University of Mainz.

The starting compounds were synthesized according to the following references: 1 [9, 10], 2a [1113], 2b [14, 15], 2c [16, 17], 3 [19].

4.1 Cycloaddition of 1 and 2b, c

Thiete 1 (122 mg, 1.0 mmol) and dithione 2a, b (1.0 mmol) were heated in 20 mL of dry toluene to reflux. TLC control (SiO2, toluene-n-hexane 1:1) revealed, that the reaction came to an end after about 6 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated and separated by column chromatography (4 × 40 cm SiO2, toluene/n-hexane 1:1). The first fraction consisted of some unreacted 2a, b. Monocycloadduct 4b, c was obtained as a second fraction and the stereoisomeric biscycloadducts 5b/5b′ and 5c/5c′, respectively, as a third fraction.

4.1.1 4′,8′-Diethoxy-4H-1,3-benzodithiin-2-spiro-2′-(1′,3′,5′,7′)-tetrathia-s-indacene-6′-thione (4b)

Yellow crystals, which melted at 110°C; yield 220 mg (44%). – 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 1.34 (t, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 6 H, CH3), 3.92 (s, 2 H, 4-H), 4.03 (q, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 4 H, OCH2), 7.33–7.41 (m, 4 H, 5-H, 6-H, 7-H, 8-H) ppm. – MS (EI): m/z (%) = 500 (9) [M]+, 378 (52), 154 (100). – C19H16O2S7 (500.8): calcd. C 45.57, H 3.22; found C 45.49, H 3.41.

4.1.2 4′,8′-Bishexyloxy-4H-1,3-benzodithiin-2-spiro-2′-(1′,3′,5′,7′)-tetrathia-s-indacene-6′-thione (4c)

Yellow oil, yield 209 mg (34%). – 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 0.86–0.90 (m, 6 H, CH3), 1.24–1.33 (m, 8 H, CH2), 1.34–1.41 (m, 4 H, CH2), 1.59–1.68 (m, 4 H, CH2), 3.90–3.98 (m, 4 H, OCH2), 3.92 (s, 2 H, 4-H), 7.32–7.40 (m, 4 H, 5-H, 6-H, 7-H, 8-H) ppm. – MS (FD): m/z (%) = 612 (100) [M]+. – C27H32O2S7 (613.0): calcd. C 52.90, H 5.26; found C 52.82, H 5.03.

4.1.3 cis- and trans-4′,8′-diethoxy-di-spiro[4H-1,3-benzodithiin-2,2′-(1′,3′,5′,7′)-tetrathia-s-indacene-6′,2″-4″H-1″,3″-benzodithiin] (5b and 5b′)

Light yellow oil, yield 98 mg (32% rel. to 2b). – 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 1.27 (t, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 6 H, CH3), 1.28 (t, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 6 H, CH3), 3.90 (s, 8 H, 4-H, 4″-H), 3.93–4.00 (m, 8 H, OCH2), 7.28–7.44 (m, 16 H, 5-H, 6-H, 7-H, 8-H, 5″-H, 6″-H, 7″-H, 8″-H) ppm. On the basis of the doubled CH3 signals and some doubled 13C NMR signals (Table 1), a ratio of 1:1 was determined for the two stereoisomers 5b and 5b′. – MS (FD): m/z (%) = 622 (100) [M]+. – C26H22O2S8 (623.0): calcd. C 50.12, H 3.56; found C 49.94, H 3.61.

When 1 and 2a were subjected to the reaction conditions described above the majority of 2a remained undissolved after 6 h boiling in toluene, whereas 1 has disappeared. In the NMR spectra of the soluble part, the typical signals for the ring-CH2 groups could be detected (δ (1H) = 3.90, δ (13C) = 36.0 ppm). Moreover, the 13C NMR signal of the spiro-C atom was found at δ = 82.3 ppm.

4.1.4 cis- and trans-4′,8′-bishexyloxy-di-spiro[4H-1,3-benzodithiin-2,2′-(1′,3′,5′,7′)-tetrathia-s-indacene-6′,2″-4″H-1″,3″-benzodithiin] (5c and 5c′)

Nearly colorless, viscous oil; yield 130 mg (35% rel. to 2c). – 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 0.84–0.88 (m, 12 H, CH3), 1.23–1.30 (m, 16 H, CH2), 1.30–1.39 (m, 8 H, CH2), 1.59–1.67 (m, 8 H, CH2), 3.80–3.92 (m, 8 H, OCH2), 3.90 (s, 8 H, 4-H, 4″-H), 7.27–7.44 (m, 16 H, 5-H, 6-H, 7-H, 8-H, 5″-H, 6″-H, 7″-H, 8″-H) ppm. On the basis of some doubled 13C NMR signals (Table 1), a 1:1 ratio of the two stereoisomers was estimated. – MS (FD): m/z (%) = 735 (100) [M]+. – C34H38O2S8 (735.2): calcd. C 55.55, H 5.21; found C 55.41, H 5.32.

4.2 Cycloaddition of 3 and 2b

Dithione 2b (378 mg, 1.0 mmol) and bisthiete 3 (166 mg, 1.0 mmol) were dissolved in 200 mL of dry toluene and dropped in 200 mL of boiling toluene within 4 h. The mixture was filtered and concentrated. Column chromatography (4 × 30 cm SiO2, toluene/n-hexane 1:1) gave some unreacted 2b as a first fraction and monocycloadduct 6b as a second fraction. The third fraction contains a mixture of oligomers.

4.2.1 4′,8′-Diethoxy-7H-thieto[2,3-g]benzo-1,3-dithiin-2-spiro-2′-(1′,3′,5′,7′)-tetrathia-s-indacene-6′-thione (6b)

Light yellow oil, yield 84 mg (15%). – 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 1.34 (t, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 6 H, CH3), 3.85 (s, 2 H, 4-H), 4.01–4.04 (m, 4 H, OCH2), 4.30 (s, 2 H, 7-H), 6.90, 7.09 (2s, 2 H, 5-H, 8-H) ppm. – MS (FD): m/z (%) = 544 (100) [M]+. – C20H16O2S8 (544.9): calcd. C 44.09, H 2.96; found C 43.98, H 3.07.

4.3 Cycloaddition of 3 and 2c

To a 100°C hot solution of 2c (980 mg, 2.0 mmol) in dry toluene, 3 (166 mg, 1.0 mmol), dissolved in 100 mL of dry toluene, was dropped within 4 h. After stirring for another hour at 100°C, the reaction mixture was concentrated and purified by column chromatography (4 × 60 cm SiO2, toluene-n-hexane 1:1). The first fraction consisted of small amounts of unreacted 2c, the second fraction of pure 7c and the third fraction of a mixture of oligomers.

4.3.1 4,8,4″,8″-Tetrakishexyloxy-4′,9′-dihydro-di-spiro[2,3,5,7-tetrathia-s-indacene-2,2′-benzo[1,2-d:4,5-d]bis[1,3]dithiin-7′,2″-[1,3,5,7]-tetrathia-s-indacene]-6,6″-dithione (7c)

Almost colorless oil, yield 415 mg (36%). – 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 0.80–0.94 (m, 12 H, CH3), 1.23–1.47 (m, 24 H, CH2), 1.55–1.80 (m, 8 H, CH2), 3.84–3.97 (m, 8 H, OCH2), 3.90 (s, 4 H, 4′-H, 9′-H), 7.40 (s, 2 H, 5′-H, 10′-H) ppm. – MS (FD): m/z (%) = 1148 (35) [M]+, 474 (100). – C48H58O4S14 (1147.9): calcd. C 50.23, H 5.09; found C 49.97, H 5.17.

4.4 Mixture of oligomers

The mass-spectrometric study (FD) of the oligomer fraction gave for series 9 the m/z values 916 (n=2), 1342 (n=3) and 1768 (n=4) and for the series 10 the m/z values 1312 (2 3 + 2 2b) and 1802 (2 3 + 3 2b).

4.5 Crystal structure analysis

Details of the crystal structure analysis are summarized in Table 3. The measurement was performed with an Enraf-Nonius Turbo CAD-4 diffractometer applying the CAD4 software V5 [23]. The structure was solved by Direct Methods (Shelxs-86 [24]).

Table 3:

Details of the X-ray crystal structure analysis of 4b.

FormulaC19H16O2S7
Mr500.74
HabitLight yellow block
Crystal size, mm30.032 × 0.192 × 1.92
Crystal systemmonoclinic
Space groupP21/c
Cell parameters
 a, Å10.602(5)
b, Å10.221(5)
c, Å20.071(8)
β, deg92.28(2)
V, Å32173(1)
 Z4
D, g cm−31.530
 RadiationCuKα
μ, mm−16.83
F(000), e1032
T298 K
θmax, deg75.0
No. of reflections
 Measured4458
 Independent4458
 Observed4219
[Fo/σ (Fo) > 4.0]
Rσ0.0188
 Refined parameters263
R1 [F2 > 2 σ (F2)]0.0741
wR0.2074
S1.092
 Δρfin(max/min), eÅ−3–0.76/1.37

CCDC 813443 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

References

[1] H. Meier, Molecules2012, 1548.10.3390/molecules17021548Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] K. A. Kolmakov, A. J. Kresge, Canad. J. Chem.2008, 86, 119.10.1139/v07-142Search in Google Scholar

[3] E. Block, Sci. Synth.2007, 33, 235.10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2007.33.235Search in Google Scholar

[4] L. Fodor, G. Bernath, P. Sohar, D. Gröschl, H. Meier, Monatsh. Chem.2006, 137, 231.10.1007/s00706-005-0408-6Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. Meier, J. Prakt. Chem./Chem. Ztg.1996, 338, 383.10.1002/prac.19963380174Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. Meier, A. Mayer, D. Gröschl, Sulfur Reports1994, 16, 23.10.1080/01961779408048965Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. K. Leung, T.-Y. Luh, Sci. Synth2006, 30, 221.Search in Google Scholar

[8] H. Meier, D. Gröschl, R. Beckert, D. Weiss, Liebigs Ann./Recueil1997, 1603.10.1002/jlac.199719970743Search in Google Scholar

[9] Y. L. Mao, V. Boekelheide, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA1980, 77, 1732.10.1073/pnas.77.4.1732Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] H. Meier, A. Mayer, Synthesis1996, 327.10.1055/s-1996-4211Search in Google Scholar

[11] P. Wolf, K. Müllen, M. Przybylski, Chimica1986, 40, 200.10.2533/chimia.1986.200Search in Google Scholar

[12] F. C. Krebs, J. Larsen, K. Boubekeur, M. Fourmigue, Acta Chem. Scand.1993, 47, 910.10.3891/acta.chem.scand.47-0910Search in Google Scholar

[13] X. Gao, L. Weiping, Y. Liu, W. Qiu, X. Sun, G. Yu, D. Zhu, Chem. Commun.2006, 2750.10.1039/b603632eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] R. Soto, T. Kimura, T. Goto, M. Saito, Tetrahedron Lett.1988, 29, 6291.10.1016/S0040-4039(00)82328-XSearch in Google Scholar

[15] M. Adam, P. Wolf, H. J. Raeder, K. Müllen, Chem. Commun.1990, 1624.10.1039/C39900001624Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. J. Raeder, U. Scherer, P. Wolf, K. Müllen, Synthetic Met.1989, 32, 15.10.1016/0379-6779(89)90825-4Search in Google Scholar

[17] S. Frenzel, M. Baumgarten, K. Müllen, Synthetic Met.2001, 118, 97.10.1016/S0379-6779(00)00283-6Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Mayer, N. Rumpf, S. Hillmann, H. Meier, Helv. Chim. Acta2015, 98, 1061.10.1002/hlca.201500083Search in Google Scholar

[19] H. Meier, A. Mayer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.1994, 33, 465.10.1002/anie.199404651Search in Google Scholar

[20] H. Meier, B. Rose, D. Schollmeyer, Liebigs Annalen/Recueil1997, 1173.10.1002/jlac.199719970619Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Adam, E. Fanghänel, K. Müllen, Y.-J. Shen, R. Wegner, Synthetic Met.1994, 66, 275.10.1016/0379-6779(94)90077-9Search in Google Scholar

[22] H. J. Bocker, P. L. Stedehouder, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas1933, 52, 923.10.1002/recl.19330521105Search in Google Scholar

[23] Enraf-Nonius, CAD-4 Operations Software, Enraf-Nonius, Delft (The Netherlands), 1981.Search in Google Scholar

[24] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-3-15
Accepted: 2016-5-3
Published Online: 2016-6-29
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 5.8.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0063/html
Scroll to top button