Abstract
In this article, we revisit the question of analysing the efficiencies of partially entangled states in three-qubit classes under real conditions. Our results show some interesting observations regarding the efficiencies and correlations of partially entangled states. Surprisingly, we find that the efficiencies of many three-qubit partially entangled states exceed that of maximally entangled three-qubit states under real noisy conditions and applications of weak measurements. Our analysis, therefore, suggests that the efficiencies of partially entangled states are much more robust to noise than those of maximally entangled states at least for the GHZ (Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger) class states, for certain protocols; i.e. less correlations in the initially prepared state may also lead to better efficiency and hence one need not always consider starting with a maximally entangled state with maximum correlations between the qubits. For a set of partially entangled states, we find that the efficiency is optimal, independent of the decoherence and state parameters, if the value of weak measurement parameter is very large. For other values of the weak measurement parameter, the robustness of the states depends on the decoherence and state parameters. Moreover, we further show that one can achieve higher efficiencies in a protocol by using non-optimal weak measurement strengths instead of optimal weak measurement strengths.
1 Introduction
Quantum entanglement – shared between distant users – is shown to be an efficient resource in comparison to its classical counterparts for many communication protocols such as quantum computing [1], quantum cryptography [2], quantum teleportation [3], dense coding [4], and quantum secret sharing [5]. The basic concept behind the efficiency of quantum resources in comparison to classical resources lies in the existence of long-range nonlocal correlations existing between the qubits [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. These correlations, however, are subjected to decoherence due to the interaction of entangled qubits with the environment during entanglement distribution [11], [12], [13]; this leads to degradation of entanglement and non-violation of the Bell-type inequality [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Interestingly, there are instances where nonlocal correlations in a partially entangled state are found to be more robust in comparison to a maximally entangled state, leading to the anomaly [18], [19] that maximal nonlocality may not coincide with maximum entanglement [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. These unavoidable couplings further result in the decreased efficiency of entangled resources in quantum information processing protocols. For example, in general, if an entangled resource used for quantum teleportation is maximally entangled or belongs to some specialised class, then one can achieve perfect teleportation with unit fidelity [32], [33], [34]. However, because of the interaction with the environment, a maximally entangled pure state may evolve into a mixed state, resulting in decreased fidelity of quantum teleportation [35]. Moreover, in comparison to a maximally entangled multi-qubit state, if the users in a communication protocol share a multi-qubit partially entangled state, then the fidelity of teleportation depends on the parameters of the state to be teleported, even under ideal conditions [33], [36], [37]. Clearly, the situation becomes much more intricate when one considers a real experimental set-up where the noise cannot be ignored any longer; hence, the need to analyse the efficiency of partially entangled multi-qubit states under real noisy conditions so that one can take informed decisions whether to use a particular entangled state under noisy conditions or not. One of the measures to compare the efficiencies of entangled states is the fidelity of teleportation. For example, quantum teleportation is considered to be successful for fidelity

Application of weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal in the decoherence channel.
We, therefore, readdress the question of the usefulness and efficiency of multi-qubit, partially entangled states under real noisy conditions using weak measurement and its reversal operations. For this purpose, we analyse and compare the efficiencies of three different sets of three-qubit, partially entangled states from two inequivalent classes, namely the GHZ class and the W class [67], for teleportation and dense coding protocols. Our analysis shows some interesting observations regarding the applications of weak measurement and its reversal operations for amplitude damping channels. For instance, using a class of states (
For characterizing the quantum correlations in the finally shared three-qubit states, we use the three-qubit Svetlichny inequality [68] whose violation is a necessary and sufficient condition to confirm the presence of nonlocal correlations in an underlying quantum state. Our results indicate that, although the Svetlichny inequality is not violated by three-qubit, partially entangled states even for a small decoherence parameter, the fidelity of teleportation is surprisingly greater than
In following sections, we first briefly discuss decoherence, weak measurement, its reversal operations, and nonlocal correlations in three-qubit systems, and then move ahead to analyse the efficiencies of three-qubit, partially entangled states for quantum information processing.
2 System-Environment Interactions
In any communication protocol, system qubits always interact with the environment, leading to unwanted coupling and resulting in noise [11]. The coupling of system qubits with the environment is described as the evolution
where
and d is the decoherence parameter
3 Weak Measurement and Quantum Measurement Reversal Operations
In 2012, Kim et al. [59] proposed a scheme to protect entanglement from decoherence, based on the fact that weak measurements can be reversed. The proposed scheme makes use of weak measurement and the corresponding quantum measurement reversal to avoid the effect of decoherence, as shown in Figure 1, where w is the weak measurement strength, d is decoherence parameter, and wr is the strength of the reversing measurement. For an amplitude damping channel, the optimum value for the reversal measurement is given as
4 Nonlocal Correlations
Quantum theory allows correlations between spatially separated particles, which are fundamentally different from classical correlations. For example, the violation of Bell-type inequalities in bipartite and multi-qubit entangled systems confirms the presence of genuine quantum correlations between the particles. These correlations, when subjected to noisy quantum channels, degrade as a result of decoherence, affecting the overall efficiency of a protocol. In this article, we emphasise on analysing such nonlocal correlations and efficiency of three-qubit partially entangled states.
For three-qubit systems, the violation of the Svetlichny inequality [68] is defined as follows:
where
The Svetlichny inequality confirms the presence of genuine tripartite correlations between the qubits. In general, the violation of the Svetlichny inequality, therefore, suggests that the underlying quantum state can be used as an efficient resource in quantum information processing. For example, the Svetlichny inequality is violated by the state

Effect of decoherence on quantum correlations using the Svetlichny inequality for

Teleportation using the
5 Quantum Teleportation using Quantum Gates
Quantum teleportation [3] is a process by which quantum information can be transmitted from one location to another, without travelling the distance physically, with the help of previously shared entanglement between a sender and a receiver. In order to facilitate the discussion regarding our results, we first briefly describe quantum teleportation: Alice (sender) and Bob (receiver) share an entangled state
As a criterion for successful teleportation, one can compute the teleportation fidelity, which indicates the degree of overlap between the input and output states. For example, fidelity of quantum teleportation can be expressed as the overlap of the input state
Since the initial state is unknown, the average fidelity [72] can also be given as
5.1 Three-Qubit States as Quantum Channels for Teleportation Under Real Conditions
In order to analyse the efficiencies of partially entangled multi-qubit states in terms of teleportation fidelity in a noisy environment, we now proceed to study three different sets of three-qubit states belonging to two inequivalent classes. As discussed above, for our purpose we consider three different sets of states, namely,
5.1.1 | Φ ⟩ State as a Quantum Channel Under Real Conditions
First, we consider the partially entangled
As a preliminary example, in Figure 3 we show a quantum circuit for teleporting an unknown information encoded in the state
Using the teleportation circuit diagram in Figure 3,
or
for measurement outcomes corresponding to (000, 100, 011, 111)123 or (001, 101, 010, 110)123, respectively. Considering
and

Effect of decoherence and weak measurement on the
Hence, the average fidelity
where
where d1, d2, and d3 are the amplitude damping parameters associated with qubits 1, 2, and 3, respectively (
where w1, w2, w3 are the weak measurement parameters on qubits 1, 2, and 3, respectively (
where
Figure 5 confirms that correlations in the

Effect of decoherence on quantum correlations using discord for the

Teleportation using the GGHZ state as a quantum channel.
5.1.2 GGHZ State as a Quantum Channel Under Real Conditions
In this section, we consider the GGHZ states given by
The quantum circuit for teleporting a single qubit using the GGHZ state as a quantum channel is shown in Figure 6. Unlike the
Similarly, the average teleportation fidelity under the influence of amplitude damping noise and after the application of weak measurement and its reversal operations can be evaluated as
and
respectively.

Effect of decoherence and weak measurement on GGHZ states: (a) and (b) represent the loss of teleportation fidelity when all three qubits of GGHZ states undergo decoherence (
Figure 7a–d depict the effect of the amplitude damping channel and weak measurement and its reversal operations on teleportation fidelity. Similar to the previous case, we observe that weak measurement and its reversal operations increase the teleportation fidelity for a given decoherence channel. In fact, for higher values of weak measurement strength, one can achieve fidelity equal to that in the ideal scenario. On the other hand, unlike the previous case, the maximally entangled states are found to be more robust under the influence of mild decoherence in comparison to partially entangled states. Interestingly, for higher decoherence, the robustness of partially entangled states increases with increase in the degree of entanglement and then decreases as one approaches the maximally entangled states, further suggesting the presence of the anomaly as discussed in the previous sub-section. For a fixed noise parameter, similar observations can be obtained as one decreases the value of weak measurement strengths. Therefore, the behaviours of two sets of states

Effect of decoherence on quantum correlations using discord for the GGHZ state.

Teleportation using the W state as a quantum channel.
5.1.3 W state as a Quantum Channel Under Real Conditions
Finally, we consider another important class of three-qubit states as a quantum channel for teleportation, namely
where, if
The quantum circuit in Figure 9 [35] is distinctly different from those used for the
Similar to the case of the GGHZ states, teleportation fidelity in this case also depends on the state parameter θ, and can be given as
and
respectively.
In contrast to the cases of the

Effect of decoherence and weak measurement on W states: (a) and (b) represent the loss of teleportation fidelity when all three qubits of W states undergo decoherence (
Figure 11 shows that the correlations identified by the discord (9) in the W states are much more robust in presence of decoherence as against the indication given by the Svetlichny inequality, which further rationalises the efficiency of the W states in quantum teleportation under noisy conditions.

Effect of decoherence on quantum correlations using discord for the W state.
6 Quantum Dense Coding
Bennett and Wiesner [4] realised one of the simplest applications of quantum entanglement in the form of a dense coding protocol. In general, one can send one bit information classically from a sender to a receiver using a qubit. However, if the sender and receiver share a maximally entangled state of two qubits, then the sender can send two bits of classical message to the receiver using his/her one qubit. Therefore, the use of N pairs of maximally entangled two-qubit states results in the transmission of 2N bits of information, thereby doubling the classical information capacity of a channel. In the superdense coding protocol, an entangled state is distributed between a sender and a receiver. The sender performs one of the four single-qubit unitary operations, i.e. I, σx,
The dense coding capacity [73] for a quantum system
where DA is the dimension of Alice’s sub-system,
6.1 Three-Qubit States as Quantum Channels for Dense Coding
For analysing the efficiencies of partially entangled three-qubit states for dense coding protocol, we assume that the first two qubits are with Alice and the last qubit is with Bob. For a maximally entangled
6.1.1 | Φ ⟩ State as a Quantum Channel
The dense coding capacity given by (16) using a

Effect of decoherence and weak measurement on the

Effect of decoherence and weak measurement on the GGHZ state: (a) represents the loss of dense coding capacity when all three qubits of the GGHZ state undergo decoherence (
Figure 12b demonstrates the effect of weak measurement and its reversal operations on the dense coding capacity, considering d = 0.5. Clearly, the dense coding capacity exceeds the classical bound whenever w ≥ 0.6 for a given range of parameters. At higher values of w, the dense coding capacity is always better than that of the classical one. The increase in dense coding capacity, however, decreases with the value of the state parameter, indicating that, if the originally prepared states are less entangled, one will obtain better results in dense coding protocol under noisy conditions.

Effect of decoherence and weak measurement on the W state: (a) represents loss of dense coding capacity when all three qubits of the W state undergo decoherence (
6.1.2 GGHZ State as a Quantum Channel
The dense coding capacity of GGHZ states as resources in ideal condition is given as
Figure 13a and b describe the effect of the amplitude damping channel and weak measurement and its reversal operations on dense coding capacity, respectively. Similar to the
6.1.3 W state as a Quantum Channel
In this case, the dense coding capacity is given by
Figure 14a and b describe the effect of amplitude damping decoherence and weak measurement and its reversal operations on the dense coding capacity using W states as a quantum channel. A comparison of dense coding efficiencies for the three states indicates that
7 Efficiency of Partially Entangled States in Noisy Conditions Using Non-optimum Weak Measurement Operations
The optimum value of the weak measurement reversal strength that leads to the effective enhancement in the efficiencies of quantum information processing protocols, as discussed above, is given by

(a) Average teleportation fidelity, (b) dense coding capacity, and (c) negativity for the GGHZ state when the decoherence parameter d = 0.5 and weak measurement strength w = 0.8.

(a) Average teleportation fidelity, (b) dense coding capacity, and (c) negativity for the GGHZ state when decoherence parameter d = 0.5 and reversal weak measurement strength
For studying the efficiencies of mixed states evolving from the initially prepared GGHZ states for non-optimal weak measurement strengths at different values of state parameters, we characterise the degree of entanglement in these states using tripartite negativity [74] as a measure of entanglement for mixed states, which is defined as
where
8 Summary and Conclusion
In any quantum information processing protocol, it is imperative to analyse the efficacy of entangled resources under real conditions. In fact, in any actual set-up avoiding the interaction of qubits with the environment may not be feasible, and hence one needs to study models that lead to real conditions such that maximum efficiency can be achieved and the associated parameters and their effects on the protocol can be understood. Therefore, in the present study, we have analysed the efficiency of three-qubit partially entangled states in two inequivalent classes of three-qubit entangled states in presence of noise and applications of weak measurement and its reversal operations. Our results indicate that, for teleportation protocol, the
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India, and IIT Jodhpur for providing the research facility.
References
[1] C. H. Bennett and D. P. DiVincenzo, Nature 404, 247 (2000).10.1038/35005001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002).10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145Suche in Google Scholar
[3] C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] M. Hillery, V. Bužek, and A. Berthiaume, Phys Rev. A 59, 1829 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1829Suche in Google Scholar
[6] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).10.1103/PhysRev.47.777Suche in Google Scholar
[7] J. S. Bell, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).10.1111/j.1444-0938.1964.tb01735.xSuche in Google Scholar
[8] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.460Suche in Google Scholar
[9] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91Suche in Google Scholar
[10] A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804Suche in Google Scholar
[11] I. Chuang and M. Nielsen, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2010.10.1017/CBO9780511976667Suche in Google Scholar
[12] W. H. Zurek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715Suche in Google Scholar
[13] M. P. Almeida, F. de Melo, M. Hor-Meyll, A. Salles, S. P. Walborn, et al., Science 316, 579 (2007).10.1126/science.1139892Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] A. R. R. Carvalho, F. Mintert, and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230501 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.230501Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] M. Hein, W. Dür, and H.-J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032350 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032350Suche in Google Scholar
[16] M. Mahdian, R. Yousefjani, and S. Salimi, Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 133 (2012).10.1140/epjd/e2012-20688-1Suche in Google Scholar
[17] M. Tchoffo, L. T. Kenfack, G. C. Fouokeng, and L. C. Fai, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 380 (2016).10.1140/epjp/i2016-16380-3Suche in Google Scholar
[18] A. Acin, T. Durt, N. Gisin, and J. I. Latorre, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052325 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevA.65.052325Suche in Google Scholar
[19] A. A. Méthot and V. Scarani, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0601210 (2006).Suche in Google Scholar
[20] B. C. Hiesmayr, Eur. Phys. J. C 50, 73 (2007).10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0199-xSuche in Google Scholar
[21] N. Brunner, Phys. E: Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 42, 354 (2010).10.1016/j.physe.2009.06.050Suche in Google Scholar
[22] M. Junge and C. Palazuelos, Commun. Math. Phys. 306, 695 (2011).10.1007/s00220-011-1296-8Suche in Google Scholar
[23] T. Vidick and S. Wehner, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052310 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052310Suche in Google Scholar
[24] R. Chaves, A. Acn, L. Aolita, and D. Cavalcanti, Phys. Rev. A, 89, 042106 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevA.89.042106Suche in Google Scholar
[25] A. de Rosier, J. Gruca, F. Parisio, T. Vértesi, and W. Laskowski, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012101 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevA.96.012101Suche in Google Scholar
[26] P. Singh and A. Kumar, Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 249 (2018).10.1007/s11128-018-2016-5Suche in Google Scholar
[27] P. Singh and A. Kumar, Z. Naturforsch. A 73, 191 (2018).10.1515/zna-2017-0322Suche in Google Scholar
[28] P. Singh and A. Kumar, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 3172 (2018).10.1007/s10773-018-3835-ySuche in Google Scholar
[29] E. A. Fonseca and F. Parisio, Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevA.92.030101Suche in Google Scholar
[30] S.-W. Lee and D. Jaksch, Phys. Rev. A 80, 010103 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevA.80.010103Suche in Google Scholar
[31] S.-W. Ji, J. Lee, J. Lim, K. Nagata, and H.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 78, 052103 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevA.78.052103Suche in Google Scholar
[32] A. Karlsson and M. Bourennane, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4394 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevA.58.4394Suche in Google Scholar
[33] P. Agrawal and A. Pati, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062320 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevA.74.062320Suche in Google Scholar
[34] F. L. Yan, T. Gao, and Y. C. Li, Europhys. Lett. 84, 50001 (2008).10.1209/0295-5075/84/50001Suche in Google Scholar
[35] E. Jung, M.-R. Hwang, Y. H. Ju, M.-S. Kim, S.-K. Yoo, et al., Phys. Rev. A 78, 012312 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012312Suche in Google Scholar
[36] M. Y. Wang and F. L. Yan, Eur. Phys. J. D 54, 111 (2009).10.1140/epjd/e2009-00159-8Suche in Google Scholar
[37] W.-L. Li, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 61, 034301 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevA.61.034301Suche in Google Scholar
[38] S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 797 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.797Suche in Google Scholar
[39] C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722Suche in Google Scholar
[40] R. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and P. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 222, 21 (1996).10.1016/0375-9601(96)00639-1Suche in Google Scholar
[41] M.-L. Hu, Phys. Lett. A 375, 922 (2011).10.1016/j.physleta.2010.12.058Suche in Google Scholar
[42] P. Espoukeh and P. Pedram, Quantum Inf. Process. 13, 1789 (2014).10.1007/s11128-014-0766-2Suche in Google Scholar
[43] T. Hiroshima, Phys. Lett. A 301, 263 (2002).10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00968-4Suche in Google Scholar
[44] J.-W. Pan, S. Gasparoni, R. Ursin, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Nature 423, 417 (2003).10.1038/nature01623Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] P. G. Kwiat, A. J. Berglund, J. B. Altepeter, and A. G. White, Science 290, 498 (2000).10.1126/science.290.5491.498Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[46] S. Maniscalco, F. Francica, R. L. Zaffino, N. L. Gullo, and F. Plastina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 090503 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.090503Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[47] P. W. Shor, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] X. Xiao, Y. Yao, W.-J. Zhong, Y.-L. Li, and Y.-M. Xie, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012307 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012307Suche in Google Scholar
[49] A. N. Korotkov and K. Keane, Phys. Rev. A 81, 040103 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevA.81.040103Suche in Google Scholar
[50] X. Xiao and Y.-L. Li, Eur. Phys. J. D 67, 204 (2013).10.1140/epjd/e2013-40036-3Suche in Google Scholar
[51] Y. W. Cheong and S.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150402 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.150402Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[52] Q. Sun, M. Al-Amri, and M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 80, 033838 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevA.80.033838Suche in Google Scholar
[53] G. S. Paraoanu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 180406 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.180406Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[54] R. L. Franco, B. Bellomo, E. Andersson, and G. Compagno, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032318 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevA.85.032318Suche in Google Scholar
[55] N. Katz, M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200401 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.200401Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[56] Q. Sun, M. Al-Amri, L. Davidovich, and M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 82, 052323 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevA.82.052323Suche in Google Scholar
[57] G. S. Paraoanu, Phys. Rev. A 83, 044101 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevA.83.044101Suche in Google Scholar
[58] J.-C. Lee, Y.-C. Jeong, Y.-S. Kim, and Y.-H. Kim, Opt. Express 19, 16309 (2011).10.1364/OE.19.016309Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[59] Y.-S. Kim, J.-C. Lee, O. Kwon, and Y.-H. Kim, Nat. Phys. 8, 117 (2012).10.1038/nphys2178Suche in Google Scholar
[60] A. N. Korotkov and A. N. Jordan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 166805 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.166805Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[61] Y.-S. Kim, Y.-W. Cho, Y.-S. Ra, and Y.-H. Kim, Opt. Express 17, 11978 (2009).10.1364/OE.17.011978Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[62] X.-Y. Xu, Y. Kedem, K. Sun, L. Vaidman, C.-F. Li, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 033604 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.033604Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[63] N. Katz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, R. McDermott, et al., Science 312, 1498 (2006).10.1126/science.1126475Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[64] J. P. Groen, D. Ristè, L. Tornberg, J. Cramer, P. C. De Groot, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090506 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.090506Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[65] S.-Y. Guan, Z. Jin, H.-J. Wu, A.-D. Zhu, H.-F. Wang, et al., Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 137 (2017).10.1007/s11128-017-1584-0Suche in Google Scholar
[66] T. Pramanik and A. S. Majumdar, Phys. Lett. A 377, 3209 (2013).10.1016/j.physleta.2013.10.012Suche in Google Scholar
[67] W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314Suche in Google Scholar
[68] G. Svetlichny, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3066 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3066Suche in Google Scholar
[69] C. C. Rulli and M. S. Sarandy, Phys. Rev. A 84, 042109 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042109Suche in Google Scholar
[70] S. Oh, S. Lee, and H.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 66, 022316 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevA.66.022316Suche in Google Scholar
[71] L. T. Knoll, C. T. Schmiegelow, and M. A. Larotonda, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042332 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042332Suche in Google Scholar
[72] S. Massar and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1259Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[73] G. Bowen, Phys. Rev. A 63, 022302 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevA.63.022302Suche in Google Scholar
[74] C. Sabn and G. Alcaine, Eur. Phys. J. D 48, 435 (2008).10.1140/epjd/e2008-00112-5Suche in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- General
- Approximate Solution of Coupled Schrödinger and Poisson Equation in Inversion Layer Problem: An Approach Based on Homotopy Perturbations
- Atomic, Molecular & Chemical Physics
- Hückel Molecular Orbital Quantities of {X,Y}-Cyclacene Graphs Under Next-Nearest-Neighbour Approximations in Analytical Forms
- Dynamical Systems & Nonlinear Phenomena
- On the Higher-Order Phase Shift Contributions in Opposite Polarities Dust Plasmas
- Dynamical Behavior of Supernonlinear Positron-Acoustic Periodic Waves and Chaos in Nonextensive Electron-Positron-Ion Plasmas
- Hydrodynamics
- Electro-osmotic and Pressure-Driven Flow in an Eccentric Microannulus
- Quantum Theory
- Analysing the Efficiencies of Partially Entangled Three-Qubit States for Quantum Information Processing Under Real Conditions
- Solid State Physics & Materials Science
- Non-reciprocal Transmission of Electromagnetic Waves in Asymmetric Photonic Crystals
- Computational Study of Ru2TiZ (Z = Si, Ge, Sn) for Structural, Mechanical and Vibrational Properties
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- General
- Approximate Solution of Coupled Schrödinger and Poisson Equation in Inversion Layer Problem: An Approach Based on Homotopy Perturbations
- Atomic, Molecular & Chemical Physics
- Hückel Molecular Orbital Quantities of {X,Y}-Cyclacene Graphs Under Next-Nearest-Neighbour Approximations in Analytical Forms
- Dynamical Systems & Nonlinear Phenomena
- On the Higher-Order Phase Shift Contributions in Opposite Polarities Dust Plasmas
- Dynamical Behavior of Supernonlinear Positron-Acoustic Periodic Waves and Chaos in Nonextensive Electron-Positron-Ion Plasmas
- Hydrodynamics
- Electro-osmotic and Pressure-Driven Flow in an Eccentric Microannulus
- Quantum Theory
- Analysing the Efficiencies of Partially Entangled Three-Qubit States for Quantum Information Processing Under Real Conditions
- Solid State Physics & Materials Science
- Non-reciprocal Transmission of Electromagnetic Waves in Asymmetric Photonic Crystals
- Computational Study of Ru2TiZ (Z = Si, Ge, Sn) for Structural, Mechanical and Vibrational Properties